Marvel Movies Are Huge, So Why Won't a Deadpool Movie Get Made?

When it comes to the X-Men films, the “merc with a mouth” isn’t fit for the franchise.

Aug 31, 2014 at 10:37AM

Marvel Movies Deadpool Movie Sdcc Test Footage

Ryan Reynolds in a test reel for a Deadpool movie. Sources: Google+ via Craig Kandiko. Twenty-First Century Fox owns the movie rights to Deadpool.

Forget about how big Marvel movies are right now. The X-Men may keep Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (NASDAQ:FOXA) from making a Deadpool movie. Call it the downside of Hollywood's franchise era.

Unmuzzling the "merc with a mouth"

Ever since Ryan Reynolds played the pre-scarred Wade Wilson -- later to be known as "Deadpool" -- in 2009's X-Men Origins: Wolverine, there's been talk of a Deadpool movie. The buzz turned into a roar during last month's San Diego Comic-Con, when Blur Studio released one minute and 48 seconds of a long-discussed, eight-minute test reel. 

There's no way to know if more than 50,000 fans would actually buy a ticket to see a Deadpool movie in the theater. But what if they did? And what if they told their friends to see the movie? Again, we can't know for sure if that would happen, but we have seen a surge in search interest for the term "deadpool movie," which no doubt speaks to the buzz the test footage has generated.

A franchise unto himself

Yet, Reynolds' on-screen antics aren't the only reason there's demand for a Deadpool movie. Fans genuinely love the character, as the July comics sales charts show. All eight of his issues made the top 100 -- no easy feat:



Est. Copies Sold to Retailers
Est. Gross Sales

Deadpool vs. X-Force #1




Deadpool #31




Deadpool #32




Deadpool vs. X-Force #2




Deadpool: Dracula's Gauntlet #1




Deadpool: Dracula's Gauntlet #2




Deadpool: Dracula's Gauntlet #3




Deadpool: Dracula's Gauntlet #4




Source: Diamond Comics Distributors via The Comics Chronicles.

In Deadpool vs. the X-Men, the X-Men win

No matter how good these numbers might look, they pale compared to the franchise potential of X-Men, which has spawned seven movies over 14 years, resulting in $3.05 billion in grosses as of this writing, Box Office Mojo reports. The latest in the series -- X-Men: Days of Future Past -- is currently the summer's top comic book adaptation, at $744 million worldwide. Fox has a huge financial incentive to expand this universe.

Deadpool wouldn't get the job done. Why? Deadpool isn't for children. He's a foul-mouthed, ultra-violent psychopath who wouldn't work well in a mainstream X-film. Smoothing the edges just to include him in the franchise could make for an awful movie, and terrible box office losses.

Then again, staying true to a violent character is no guarantee of success either. Lions Gate Entertainment's (NYSE:LGF) R-rated take on the vigilante known as The Punisher did poorly enough that the studio returned the film rights to Marvel. How the studio plans to handle him in future films is unknown at this point.

The illusion of independence

In comics, the major publishers have distinct imprints for its more adult-oriented properties. Marvel's Icon imprint published the Kick-Ass comics that subsequently became movies. DC's Vertigo line may be best known for Sandman, Neil Gaiman's award-winning series.

Most movie studios have similar imprints. At Fox, independent and horror films are released under the Fox Searchlight banner. Oscar winner 12 Years a Slave may be the most famous film to be distributed by the mini-studio.

Adding a Deadpool movie to the Fox Searchlight lineup wouldn't be too difficult, but it would also be as materially distinct from the remaining X-franchise as TheCW's Arrow is from Man of Steel, even though both are based on DC Comics properties. Franchising requires the cross-promotion that leads to lucrative licensing and merchandising deals.

Foolish takeaway

Personally, I'm holding out hope for a Deadpool movie. But the economic power of franchising is such that I expect Fox to keep this property as far away from the X-Men based films as it can.

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple.

Tim Beyers is a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team and the Motley Fool Supernova Odyssey I mission. He owned shares of Apple, Google (A and C class), and Netflix at the time of publication. Check out Tim's web home and portfolio holdings or connect with him on Google+Tumblr, or Twitter, where he goes by @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader.

The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Google (A and C shares), Lions Gate Entertainment, and Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A and C class), and Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information