3 Losers in the Big Bank of America Corp. Settlement

These groups won’t see much relief from B of A’s latest and greatest mortgage settlement

Sep 1, 2014 at 12:25PM

Although the recent settlement between Bank of America Corp. (NYSE:BAC) and the U.S. Department of Justice has been hailed as a step forward for the bank and its shareholders, not all parties involved in B of A's mortgage morass emerged victorious. Each of the following groups were given significantly less consideration than you would think, especially given their unintended involvement in the mortgage crisis.

MBS Investors
Though the settlement acknowledged that Bank of America and its subsidiaries knowingly sold faulty mortgage-backed securities to investors, bond investors were given short shrift. They will receive no compensation for their losses – and, to add insult to injury, may actually incur additional harm if the underlying loans in the MBSes are modified.

Additionally, Bank of America gets credit for any modifications made to loans, whether or not they are involved. It appears that, even as bond investors take additional lumps for their unintentionally lousy investments, B of A will be able to take the credit – literally and figuratively – for getting the consumer aid aspect of the accord taken care of.

Homeowners with problem mortgages
The settlement carved out $7 billion for consumer relief, which the bank can use to help those consumers hardest hit by the mortgage meltdown. Included in the list of acceptable assistance are:

  • loan modifications and principal forgiveness
  • lending to low-to-moderate income persons; affordable rental housing
  • investments in affordable rental housing
  • neighborhood stabilization and community reinvestment

The most immediate help would be to modify the loans of consumers already having problems, but some question whether this type of aid will ever arrive.

Other mortgage-related settlements, such as last November's $13 billion pact between the government and JPMorgan Chase & Co., had similar language. So far, JPMorgan has modified very few loans, worth a little more than $6 million – a literal drop from a $4 billion bucket of money meant for consumer relief. With a smidge over three years left to provide aid to troubled borrowers, it looks unlikely that the bank will get the job done timely.

Other settlements have performed poorly, as well. In the case of the 2012 National Mortgage Settlement, complicated rules and confusion regarding eligibility meant that fewer poor consumers were helped than was originally envisioned. All this doesn't mean that Bank of America's aid won't reach its intended recipients, but the odds seem to be against such an occurrence.

With the record-breaking sums coming from Bank of America's coffers for penalties and consumer relief, it's hard to imagine that the taxpayer would be called upon to pitch in, particularly since B of A is supposedly being punished for past sins. Alas, it is true.

This is due to the fact that banks are allowed to deduct portions of these settlements from their taxes, presumably as a cost of doing business. In JPMorgan's case, approximately $7 billion of its $13 billion agreement was assumed to be tax-deductible.

Of its own settlement amount, B of A is expected to deduct nearly $12 billion, which means it will save about $4 billion off of its total bill, courtesy of the American taxpayer.

Will these gigantic settlements deter financial institutions from repeating the types of behavior that led to the mortgage crisis? Time will tell, but at least one organization, Transparency International, doesn't seem to think so. The anti-corruption coalition recently weighed in on the subject, noting that a change in banking culture and behavior is unlikely as long as corporations and individuals responsible for such fraudulent behavior go unpunished. Since holding senior bankers accountable has largely gone unexplored by U.S. government regulators, hitting banks in the balance sheet seems to be our best – and only – deterrent option.

Take advantage of this little-known tax "loophole"
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Amanda Alix has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Bank of America. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information