Dueling Fools: Akamai Bear

Calm down, Fool. I haven't pulled support for Akamai Technologies (Nasdaq: AKAM  ) , a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick I singled out more than a year and 155% ago.

Think of this instead as an exercise. Every now and then, I review the bear case for my holdings, to see whether the investing thesis has changed materially. When it does, I sell -- but that's rare. More often, I find that in honestly reviewing the risks, I'm emboldened by my choices. Let's review the potential pitfalls for Akamai with that in mind.

Risk No. 1: Valuation
Growth stocks are, by nature, expensive, and Akamai is no exception. Check out how the content-delivery king compares with peers in its sector:

Company Price-to-sales
Akamai 15.41

VitalStream (Nasdaq: VSTH  )

10.13

SAVVIS (Nasdaq: SVVS  )

2.06
Source: Yahoo! Finance

Akamai is easily the most expensive on a price-to-sales basis. That's the fairest comparison, because neither VitalStream nor SAVVIS is profitable at the moment. Still have doubts? Fine. Consider that Akamai's forward P/E of 32.3, as measured by Yahoo! Finance, exceeds that of mega-growerGoogle (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) , which trades for a little less than 31 times expected income.

Risk No. 2: Substitution
What's more, many alternatives exist to Akamai. For example, rumors persist that Google plans a massive network that will sit alongside the Web. That's unlikely to kill Akamai, given all the other services it offers besides bandwidth, but it won't help, either.

Moreover, the secret sauce of Akamai -- that it sees the whole Web, and is therefore able to navigate it better than a pure bandwidth-driven approach -- could be nearly duplicated by network-connected hardware that cooperatively observes traffic and automatically steers data along the fastest route. Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO  ) and Juniper (Nasdaq: JNPR  ) are both capable of pulling off such a feat.

Open-source alternatives such as BitTorrent are also gaining traction. While not generally considered as reliable or secure as a CDN, BitTorrent has earned fans, includingWarner Music Group. Continued commercial adoption of the technology could entice developers to dramatically enhance the technology, crimping Akamai's growth in the same way that the JBoss open-source application server hurt BEA's results.

Risk No. 3:Competition
If that seems unlikely, think again. Akamai's competitors are getting stronger by the day. VitalStream recently emerged from the Pink Sheets to earn status as a citizen of the Nasdaq. Meanwhile, privately held Limelight Networks shows all the signs of an emerging Baby Breaker.

Limelight is so threatening that Akamai and MIT, which holds the patents that drive Akamai's business, sued the upstart in June. What's more, a recent Forrester Research (Nasdaq: FORR  ) study concluded that Limelight was a low-cost leader and that "its financial health, client experience, and network capabilities make Limelight a worthy option" for those seeking a CDN. Many have taken Forrester's advice, including MySpace and the cultish YouTube video-sharing site. Ouch.

Not exactly a Breaker on the brink, but ...
Akamai remains a great company, a market leader, and an innovator. But when Rule Breakers face Baby Breakers, there's bound to be trouble for Papa. I wonder if that's what Akamai faces right now. At the very least, it has more competition and a higher valuation than it did a year ago, and neither bodes well for short-term shareholder returns. Invest accordingly.

High-tech. Biotech. Nanotech. Any tech. David Gardner and his Foolish band of analysts cover it all forMotley Fool Rule Breakers, and they've unearthed four multibagger picks as of this writing. Find out the names of these market-beaters by asking us for a30-day all-access passto Rule Breakers. It's free, which means all you have to lose is the prospect of richer returns.

Think you're done with the Duel? You're not! Go back and read the other three arguments, and thenvote for a winner.

Despite the bearish doldrums, Fool contributorTim Beyersremains a happy Akamai shareholder. You can find out what else is in his portfolio by checking Tim's Foolprofile. The Motley Fool has an ironcladdisclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 07, 2008, at 5:23 PM, crailey wrote:

    This article was dated July 2006. What are his current comments? Or have IO missed something?

    Clay Curious

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 506320, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2014 5:41:43 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement