Not What Trimeris Needs

Recs

3

Earlier in the week, small biopharma Trimeris (Nasdaq: TRMS) revealed that it and partner Roche were being sued for patent infringement by Novartis (NYSE: NVS) over Trimeris' only marketed compound, Fuzeon.

Fuzeon, an HIV therapy, is approved in the U.S. and the European Union, among other places. Trimeris' development partner, Roche, helps market the first-in-class fusion inhibitor; sales of the drug were $200 million worldwide in the first nine months of 2007.

The Novartis lawsuit claims that Trimeris and Roche are infringing on a patent that Novartis was recently granted, but which it applied for all the way back in 1995 -- before Fuzeon's 2003 FDA approval date. Trimeris was light on the details about the lawsuit in the regulatory filing (seen here), because it hasn't been formally served yet.

Regardless of whether the Novartis suit has merit, racking up millions of dollars in legal fees fighting a patent suit is the exact opposite of what Trimeris needs right now. If Roche doesn't cover most of the costs of the lawsuit, then Trimeris' slim $16.9 million operating margin (in the first nine months of this year) will vanish to the lawyers.

Recently, Trimeris has been suffering from competitive woes in the U.S., as Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE) recently approved HIV therapy Selzentry, and soon Merck's (NYSE: MRK) Isentress, will bite into sales of Fuzeon. Sales of Fuzeon were down 8.9% year over year in the U.S. and Canada this quarter, even with only a few months of Selzentry competition. Still, international sales growth of Fuzeon has remained strong.

It's a bit ironic to see Novartis essentially suing itself, considering that it owns 33.3% of the voting rights in Roche and 6.3% of all outstanding Roche equity. Even if Trimeris loses the suit, there is almost no chance that it will have to give up all Fuzeon revenue. But the possibility of having to turn a chunk of revenues over to Novartis as royalties, even a single-digit percentage, would meaningfully affect Trimeris' already slim profits.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 544101, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 5:11:04 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
MRK $36.46 Up +1.13 +3.20%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
NVS $53.13 Down -0.16 -0.30%
Novartis AG (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
PFE $18.36 Up +0.25 +1.38%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
TRMS $3.28 Up +0.11 +3.47%
TRIMERIS, INC. CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Put: A put is an options contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to sell the underlying asset at a specified price on or before a specified date.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!