An Early Gift to Drugmakers

Recs

1

The FDA typically approves drugs for use in fighting particular diseases. In addition, doctors are generally allowed to prescribe those drugs to treat diseases other than those specified by the FDA, but drug companies aren't allowed to market their drugs to doctors for these so-called off-label indications. That could all change, however, if the FDA's newly proposed rules go into effect.

The new rules would allow drug companies to distribute copies of peer-reviewed journal articles about clinical trials. The drugs would still have to be FDA-approved, but the trials could be about patient populations other than what the drug is approved for.

The new rules could help drugmakers such as Onyx Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ONXX) or ImClone Systems (Nasdaq: IMCL), companies that get good clinical trial data but have to wait six months to a year (or more) for an FDA approval to market their drugs to doctors. Currently, their only choice is to present the data at scientific meetings or in peer-reviewed journals and hope that doctors are paying attention. Sometimes that works, but drugmakers would certainly love to be able to hand the doctor a copy of the article, rather than hope the doctor opens up a journal.

The draft regulations are far from a sure thing. Congressman Henry Waxman, a frequent critic of the drug industry, appears staunchly opposed to the changes. In a letter to the FDA commissioner, he cites numerous examples of drugs, including Merck's (NYSE: MRK) Vioxx and Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE) CELEBREX, that had data published in peer-reviewed journals that was later proven inaccurate.

While I agree that the peer-reviewed system isn't perfect, I'm not sure that doctors are going to put more faith in the journal article if it's handed to them from a sales rep than if they read it in the journal itself. Sure, more doctors will see the articles that are wrong if the rules go into effect, but a lot more will also see articles that are right. The latter could save lives -- and make drugmakers some extra cash as well.

More Foolish ramblings about the FDA:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 545840, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 5:20:26 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
MRK $36.46 Up +1.13 +3.20%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
PFE $18.36 Up +0.25 +1.38%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
IMCL $69.99 Down +0.00 +0.00%
ImClone Systems, I… CAPS Rating: **
ONXX $27.99 Up +0.10 +0.36%
Onyx Pharmaceutica… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Put: A put is an options contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to sell the underlying asset at a specified price on or before a specified date.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!