Some Scary Solar Numbers

Recs

8

My article on solar's inconvenient truth seems to have left readers angry, confused, or just hungry for more details. For the benefit of all camps, I'd like to follow up on a few of the ideas introduced yesterday. I promise to include more numbers this time.

Solar, by the numbers
Many of you want to see the numbers behind my cash flow concerns. There are a lot of ways to slice and dice the data, but let's try the following as a conversation-starter.

Below are the companies with the largest gaps between reported profits and cash flows in 2007, relative to sales. I would use trailing numbers that include the first quarter of 2008, but audited numbers from the Chinese solar players are slow to arrive. If you don't care about audited numbers, well, someday you will.

Company

Net Income ($millions)

Operating Cash Flow ($millions)

Gap as a % of Sales

Yingli Green Energy

56.7

(353.5)

69%

JA Solar (Nasdaq: JASO)

58.4

(167.2)

57%

Solarfun Power (Nasdaq: SOLF)

21.6

(146.6)

48%

LDK Solar (NYSE: LDK)

144.1

(80.7)

43%

Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL)

35.7

(59.5)

32%

Data provided by CapitalIQ.

The geographic concentration of this cash/profit chasm is notable, but China doesn't have an exclusive claim to the phenomenon. Plenty of other solar companies appear to have an earnings quality problem.

To be clear, this earnings/cash flow gap is a much bigger red flag for companies reporting profits rather than losses. I'd be more forgiving with Evergreen Solar (Nasdaq: ESLR), which reported a loss last year, because that company's just transitioning out of R&D mode. Ironically, Evergreen's GAAP net loss actually exceeded cash consumption last year.

Before we get to what this cash flow gap says about current and potential future financial stress, I want to reject the argument that it's normal or acceptable for firms to report profits while burning cash, so long as they're rapidly ramping up sales.

In a screen for additional companies reporting more than $20 million in earnings, a greater-than-$50 million cash burn, and more than 50% top-line growth in 2007, I can count the other non-financial/real estate firms on one hand. Furthermore, even within the solar space, First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR) has shown that rapid sales, earnings, and cash flow growth can coexist harmoniously.

Where the rubber doesn't meet the road
Recall that operating cash flow does not include the massive capital expenditures that these fast-growing companies are incurring. So what are some reasons for the disparity between "profits" and actual cash hitting the corporate coffers?

One fairly straightforward issue is inventories. As the companies build capacity and race to supply a ravenous market, unsold raw materials and finished goods will naturally rise. Yingli, for example, hiked inventories about 55% as sales screamed upward by 148% last year. I'm not really concerned about shenanigans here, particularly since the LDK inventory flap turned out to be fluff.

Accounts receivable is a stickier matter. For Yingli, a company whose accounts receivable grew faster than revenue in 2007, turnover has slowed quite a bit -- from around 15 times in 2005 to around 10 times in 2006 and five times in 2007. ReneSola (NYSE: SOL) is another company that saw receivable growth outrun sales last year.

There's a real squeeze occurring here, and it's quite distinct from the industry's paucity of polysilicon. On the supplier end, Yingli notes that it's common industry practice to make advance payments to both polysilicon and equipment providers. Meanwhile, advance payment requirements imposed on Yingli's own customers have decreased. The combination puts this and other solar middlemen in a tight position before any goods change hands.

Slow cash collection is bad enough, but no collection would be a disaster. I've run out of time today, but in my next installment we'll look at the risks of anticipated cash flows failing to materialize.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Fool contributor Toby Shute thinks solar is super, but doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. The Motley Fool has a bright, shiny disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2008, at 4:23 PM, Alaskatrader42 wrote:

    so do these numbers include

    cap ex into the cash flow.

    It would seem that investing into

    increased capacity would be a plus

    but here you make it seem all gloom and doom. these solar companies that you have pointed to all have large cap ex figures.

    If these companies can sell

    their product in the future , they will

    have huge gains in stock price.

    I'm not sure on the numbers but doesn't

    several of these companies already have

    large backlogs for their products.

    Isn't demand greater then supply?

    stop trying to trash solar just because

    the big money hasn't finished covering

    their short positions and backing up the truck to go long. In a couple weeks you fools will be pumping solar

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2008, at 4:28 PM, scooperone wrote:

    Thanks for the follow up article. I think it's worth considering that demand isn't likely to dry up and is more likely to increase worldwide as well as domestically under the next administration...that optimism along with industry consolidation should take away a good deal of the scary factor. To be fair, please also publish the graph again using 2008 Q1 (and Q2 numbers when available), even though it requires an apparent leap of faith that Chinese companies will report earnings correctly.

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2008, at 5:57 PM, TMFSmashy wrote:

    Alaskatrader,

    As mentioned, operating cash flow does not include capital expenditures.

    scooperone,

    You're welcome. I'll definitely watch how these figures develop as the 2008 data comes in.

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2008, at 6:27 PM, lbentiger wrote:

    Much appreciate this follow up on the earlier article. I think for similar reasons, Goldman Sacks put TSL on the conviction sell list while having others neutral and STP a conviction buy. But your numbers disagree with that judgement. You would probably put YGE on the sell list instead of TSL. Any insight about the divergence?

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2008, at 7:15 PM, TMFSmashy wrote:

    lbentiger,

    Remember that this is only one data point, and no figure in isolation should dictate a buy/sell decision. Yingli may be more attractive than Trina according to different criteria.

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2008, at 11:49 PM, seariver wrote:

    1.these Operating Cash Flow numbers are not accurate in itself (they seems derived from google, rather than from SEC filings).

    2. the gap % is not "relative to sales" as the author claimed. e.g LDK 2007 total sale rev $524m, the gap should be around 15% (if relative to sale), and TSL is around 13%. By the way, OCF is not a problem for LDK since it has $1 billion pre-payment cash from buyers.

    3. some of these # include cap-ex, especially in the case of YGE, JASO, SOLF, because some of the cap-ex are wrongly put into catagory of "working capital"... that is why it causes a huge negative OCF.

    4. These companies do have OCF problems now to 2 major factors: First, due to tight polysilicon situation, they have to pre-pay their supplies and increased inventory level. Secondly, to win more new customers, they usually extend credit to their new customers, which cause increased accounts reveivables (receive payment 2 to 3 months after sales completed). This situation will improve as polysilicon supplies increased and reduce the amount/time of credit given to customers.

    Unlike this author, I believe that all the above-mentioned companies are very profitable now and fast-growing in a high-growth industry and their OCF will be improved to positive by next year...

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2008, at 12:47 AM, NoobOh wrote:

    Only problem is that anyone who have listen to Toby's mumbo jumbo's financial joke would've either been sitting on the sidelines kicking themselves or those who shorted would've jumped off a bridge. His intelligent analysis of First Solar in July 11, 2007 was so far fetched, we might as well name him the "Pokemon Far Fetched". The stock closed at $110.54 on July 11, 2007 and today the stock is at $262. Great returns Toby! Great analysis, unfortunately it's only great if you really are a FOOL!

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2008, at 12:49 AM, NoobOh wrote:

    In case someone wants to read up on Toby's analysis of First Solar last year...

    http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2008/07/08/some-sc...

    Enjoy his analysis and let's see him continue to fool people...

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Foolingp wrote:

    I have not seen Fools printed a consistent opinion. Their opinions change in hours.

    It is not a wild guess that certain people try trashing Solar companies, especially Chinese solar companies are shorts, associate with shorts or hired by shorts.

    The name tells the truth, aren't they trying to fool the investors?

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2008, at 10:18 AM, donzink wrote:

    as a new investor just lucky i did not subscribe to your fact sheet. i notice your articles change from negative to positive as it appears to be convenient. my late husband followed your recommendation (luckily small small position) AND THEY DID TERRIBLE.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2008, at 11:45 AM, TMFSmashy wrote:

    seariver,

    My numbers, as stated, are from CapitalIQ, an institutional data provider.

    I calculate the gap as a % of sales as the difference between reported profit and OCF (for LDK, that's $224.8m), divided by sales. Not cash flow divided by sales.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2008, at 1:09 PM, jjp0124 wrote:

    There is only one word to describe the things going on in the world today and that is "greed". The entire economy and housing is now a victim of it. It use to be enough to invest Long in good companies, but not anymore. Now people actually Short some of the fastest growing companies in the world. Why? Greed! Lets make money on both sides of the fence. I own JASO and CSIQ (LONG!!) and you cannot pay me to sell these stocks. State all the numbers you like, but I am willing to bet a year from now these stock prices will be much much higher than they are now. My reward may only be the 17% Capital gains tax I'll save by being LT, but I will not submit to the propaganda. It's something different every week and it will never stop. Long term you cannot hold fast growing companies down. You keep Shorting these stocks and make the world seem like its going to end, and we'll see what you are doing in August when the next reports come out. My guess is you'll be buying regardless of your posted numbers above. PS...Please provide a list of companies which are out of business while growing 1,000%.

  • Report this Comment On July 11, 2008, at 5:24 AM, 10qdetective wrote:

    Toby, there is another squeeze going on here, an alleged scam i see developing between SolarFun founder Lu and GCL

    To witt:

    1. Contrary to statements made by news hounds and industry watchers, the GCL contract will not help will help Solarfun meet expected shipments in the range of 160-180 megawatts for 2008. Look closely, for the contract is just a restatement of an existing — and unfulfilled — contract!

    http://industry.bnet.com/energy/2008/07/09/newswires-mislead...

    2. Founder Yonghua Lu is powering up only his own bank accounts--will all collective monies common from naive ADS shareholders.

    http://industry.bnet.com/energy/2008/07/10/solarfun-ceo-powe...

    My Best & Stay in touch!

    David J Phillips - Editor, www.10qdetective.blogspot.com

    Contributing Energy Analyst

    CNET/BNET

  • Report this Comment On July 11, 2008, at 4:45 PM, iona794 wrote:

    Having read and strongly dissagreed with the author's previous article I said nothing. This time I find it impossible to ignore as the conclusion and assessment is simply wrong (I also find it difficult to believe he is not covering a short(s)). The figures albeit maybe correct they are meaningless in terms of supporting the author's conviction that these companies could run out of cash. This will not happen in this sector and especially not with well managed companies on a steep growth trajectory. The negative cash carry cited is very typical in high growth scenarios. As regards funding the 'carry' I would point out that despite the tightening availability of credit - namely the capital markets - banks are still eagerly lending to the renewable sector - in fact more than ever now e.g. from straightforward secured corporate to factoring, export trade and project finance. Disclosure: I work in a specialist lender which finances European renewable projects, however not yet to any names mentioned in the article.

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2008, at 12:36 AM, 88778877 wrote:

    To help insure integrity in articles, I am forwarding copies to the companies mentioned. If there are comments made that may negatively influence their stock prices and capitalization, they have a right to know who is saying it.

  • Report this Comment On July 13, 2008, at 6:15 AM, thbronze wrote:

    Can anybody explain what Collusion

    means ?

    And how that may apply here.

    thanks

    lol

  • Report this Comment On July 17, 2008, at 5:05 PM, RGAnstey wrote:

    Just to let you know LDK is cash flow positive now, from customer deposits, and increasing profits. Also it has a 700 million line of credit in case of any issues... Also it has already sold 1.2GWs for next year, meaning it already has revenue of over 2.5 billion for next year and if the poly plants are on time they will have a gross revenue between 40-50% of that rev. Assuming a net of 20%(a bit low, more likely 30%) you get 500 million in profit next year with a current cash flow gap of -80 million for 2007. So do you still think it will have negative cash flow next year, or for the next decade? I didn't think so either.

    There is a reason everyone is issuing convertible debt and not everyone is issuing shares straight up, this is a temporary cash flow problem. Debt holders are most concerned with cash flow, so what are each companies average interest rates on debt, that would tell us if there is actually a risk here???

    I would agree with you by this time next year if these gaps still exist you should beware of those companies, however as profits double from 2007 to 2008 and then double again in 2009 this changes the whole equation... unless you are trying to tell me that the cash flow will still be negative after revenues have more than quadrupled? with margins stabilizing from the high price of poly?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 680414, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 4:03:06 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
LDK $5.74 Down -0.06 -1.03%
LDK Solar Co., Ltd… CAPS Rating: ***
TSL $38.15 Down -0.60 -1.55%
Trina Solar Limite… CAPS Rating: **
JASO $3.71 Down -0.07 -1.85%
JA Solar Holdings… CAPS Rating: ****
FSLR $117.93 Down -2.83 -2.34%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
SOLF $5.12 Up +0.05 +0.99%
Solarfun Power Hol… CAPS Rating: ***
ESLR $1.42 Down -0.13 -8.39%
Evergreen Solar, I… CAPS Rating: ***
SOL $3.95 Down -0.03 -0.75%
RENESOLA LTD CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Amortization: Amortization refers either to paying debt in regular installments over time or deducting intangible capital expenses over time.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!