You're Missing the Point on GooHoo

Recs

2

Will you look at that? Another group is speaking out against Yahoo!'s (Nasdaq: YHOO) deal to outsource some of its paid search space to Google (Nasdaq: GOOG).

It's the World Federation of Advertisers this time, sending a letter to the European Commission with concerns over the deal. The network of advertisers feels that an increase in Google's already dominant market share position will lead to higher marketing costs for potential sponsors.

This is getting ridiculous. It's not just that every day brings a new collective that sounds like some nascent wrestling league into the fray. The rub is that GooHoo is inexplicably getting hit from all sides. Advertisers feel that they will spend more. Publishers feel that they will make less. Unless Google plans on pocketing a bigger piece of the revenue-sharing -- something that is unlikely if it awakens Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) into making a serious splash into this lucrative niche -- both sides can't be right.

In fact, both sides are wrong.

Let's think this through. When Yahoo! suggests that the deal can add as much as $800 million a year in incremental revenue to its income statement, it should be enough to silence the publishers. It is Yahoo! conceding that Google is a better platform for monetization.

As for advertisers, the implication is that they will pay more, but hold up on those cow catapults. It's a very incomplete equation. The reason why Google is so much better than Yahoo! at paid search is because it has a deep bench of inventory. Couple that with Google's targeting technology, making sure that the most effective -- and relevant -- ads are served, and you have a system that is built to deliver more leads per page view than Yahoo!.

Are individual Google ad clicks costing advertisers more than Yahoo! ad clicks? Perhaps, but Google's platform is clearly superior. In short, this deal will create more leads for advertisers. How can they not realize this? I don't expect advertisers to send Google candy hearts, but they should be grateful that Yahoo! is taking the initiative to milk more lead-generating power out of its massive page views.

Yahoo! won't be the first heavy to turn to Google for a hand in monetization. Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX) AOL and News Corp.'s (NYSE: NWS) MySpace also tap Google's ad inventory. The publisher and sponsor outcry is not only misplaced; it is unfair to Yahoo!. Denying Yahoo! -- and it's pummeled shareholders -- the same right to better monetization as other Google-turning media giants is insane. Unless the Fed wants to kick in with that $800 million in annual top-line production that Yahoo! is leaving on the table by going it alone, everyone is losing.

Yahoo! makes less money. Advertisers generate fewer leads. Publishers suffer as Yahoo! bleeds to death slowly.

Is this what the market wants? An emaciated Yahoo! on a hunger strike? One way or another, Google is going to own this market as long as Microsoft keeps tapping the snooze bar.

Other ways to spin the content bottle:

 

Follow along with the Global Gains team as they travel to key business centers in China to uncover the very best investing opportunities! Sign up here to receive their FREE dispatches from the road.

Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no problem with objectors. Yes, he doesn't object to objections. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. He is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 23, 2008, at 1:24 PM, dangerdanger wrote:

    Rick, you nailed it buddy! Finally, a person who undertands the value of this deal! Google is already running away with the search share. If Yahoo doesn't do this partnership, Google truly will have 90% market share on its own soon! This partnership makes Yahoo search ads more relevant. Better relevance makes Yahoo a stronger competitor and it also leads to more conversions for the advertiser. Every advertiser should be for this deal!! Who cares if you end up having to bid more for a keyword as as your visitors are converting more and you're getting a better ROI because of better relevance.

    If Microsoft were smart, they'd get in on a deal with Google also. Microsoft has an even smaller inventory than Google and Yahoo which is why they are a distant 3rd place.

    Many times, search visitors aren't finding relevant information on Yahoo and MSN. This is why they go over to Google (relevance, relevance, relevance). So if Yahoo can improve it's relevance over time by using Google ads sometimes, then that will make Yahoo a more competitive engine to Google.

    Google doesn't mind, because they've got such a large search lead and they'll be taking a cut of the revenue generated from visitors who click on the Google ads in Yahoo.

    Now you'll have two large relevant engines battling it out for their advertisers. It's a win/win situation for everybody.

  • Report this Comment On September 24, 2008, at 1:27 PM, oddvan wrote:

    Sorry I think you missed the real point.

    No one is talking about who has the highest price today.

    Who cares who provides value right now.

    It does not matter who has the depth of stock

    What matters in one thing .

    What will happen if GOOG has no competitors capable of taking market share.

    If Yhoo and MSFT where to give up it would leave GOOG so powerful that within a few short years it could become the most profitable company in the history of the planet.

    Controlling almost all search and almost all online ads spots. One could not expect to do well online unless they paid the GOOG TOLL. And the more people who wanted to win the more they would bid up the cost of each and every single clickable dot on the screen.

    Giving google complete ownership of adverts and search is a very poor idea .

    Suggesting Yahoo is better served by becoming a portal for google is a very poor idea. the short term gain would be great but the long term shareholder value would be gone.

    This is just how MSFT killed off companies years ago. Embrace them , work with them then when they are depending on you for most of their customers , cut them off and compete with them .

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 734493, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/6/2009 4:28:17 AM

Keep Reading:

“You're Missing the Point on GooHoo”

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Jul 2 at 4:22 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,280.74 -223.32 -2.63%
S&P 500 896.42 -26.91 -2.91%
NASD 1,796.52 +0.00 +0.00%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Yahoo!, Inc.

CAPS Rating 2/5 Stars

$14.99

-0.42 (-2.73%)

Outperform3773

Underperform960

Rate This Stock