Recs

2

WuXi and Covance Call It Quits

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

That was one very short partnership.

China-based WuXi PharmaTech (NYSE: WX  ) and U.S.-based Covance (NYSE: CVD  ) broke up yesterday -- just three months after announcing they'd form an alliance to perform pre-clinical research for drug developers looking for research and development on the cheap. Instead the companies will proceed with their plans to set up in China on their own.

When the deal was announced last June, I really didn't think it made much sense for WuXi. Sure, Covance is considerably larger, and gaining access to its clients and expertise might have helped WuXi in the short term. But WuXi seems to be attracting more and more clients on its own, so I wasn't sure how giving up 50% of the profits would have helped the Chinese company in the long run.

The companies didn't give a reason for their split. There must not be too many hard feelings from the divorce, though, because in their separate press releases, the companies didn't have anything bad to say about each other (or the deal). It's possible they had different plans for how quickly they'd roll out the services. Perhaps Covance was a little preoccupied with its deal with Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY  ) .

Whatever the reason, it doesn't mean I like them any less. In fact, I'm really bullish on pharma outsourcing companies in general. From ICON (Nasdaq: ICLR  ) to Charles River Laboratories International (NYSE: CRL  ) and even product-promotion outsourcer inVentiv Health (Nasdaq: VTIV  ) , companies in this industry should be able to increase revenue as drug developers continue to reduce costs.

As long as outsourcing companies can do the work for less, such companies should be able to prosper even in times of fear. And I'm just fine with that.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Let us know what you think in Motley Fool CAPS. Make an out- or underperform call on these companies; post a pitch about how you think the breakup will affect WuXi and Covance. It's free. It's fun. And it's Foolish!

Fool contributor Brian Orelli, Ph.D., doesn't own shares of any company mentioned in this article. inVentiv Health is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems pick. Eli Lilly is an Income Investor recommendation. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2008, at 4:41 PM, michaellee1818 wrote:

    Many reasons indicate bullish on the pharma research and development outsourcing companies are foolish:

    1. We saw the boom and failure of electronic outsources companies, like JBL, CLS, etc, in the late 1999 and earlier 2000.

    2. The management of big pharmas and small biotechs are not sure how these waves of outsources are going to benefit their drug discoveries efforts. So far every company seems just following the trend and rushes to find partners in India and China. But the results are not that good. I didn't hear anyone find a super chemical from their outsourse efforts. And the cost of outsources are going higher and higher and eventually going to level out with their internal research and development cost.

    3. The biggest problems with outsources are the intellectual protection. How can you trust your partners with countries like China and India even the baby food produced in those countries are not safe.

    4. Current big pharma and small biotech executives are mostly pursuing on cheat and quick results and forgot drug discovery needs serious,diligent scientific researches. Good drugs come with patient and detailed scientific studies. Relying on outside partners and solely focusing on commercial purpose won't be fruitful. This is why although the breakthrough of humangenone in the 1990's and big dollars spent following this by pharmas and biotechs were not fruitful. In fact the new drugs FDA approved in 2008 are less than the new drugs approved in FDA in 1982 when much less money was spent on drug R&D.

    5. Pharma executives and biotech alike will soon realized the efforts spent on outsource researches are really waste time and money. They will suddenly reduce the capacities of outsources. Just like in the 1990's, those executives believed in computer modelling can figure out a wonder molecule that ultimately didn't churn out anything. Most the computer modellers lost jobs later on. In later 1990's combinatorial technologies such as combinatorial chemistry seems solved the bottleneck of drug discovery. That didn't work out either. Most of the combinatorial departments in big pharmas were ultimately dissolved.

    6. Like the electronic outsourcing conpanies, pharma outsourcing companies need huge investment and fast expansion in their research facilities and headcount expansions when contracts are signed. When pharmas and biotechs start to reduce or even stabilize their amount of outsorucing, the fix cost for those outsouring companies are going to huge. The already low margins are going to be even lower.

    In all, the evetual fate for these pharma and biotech drug research and development outsourcing companies are going to the same as electronic outsourcing companies in the 1990's. I think if Obama become the next president, the political hurdel of outsourcing researches to other countries are going to much higher. The stock price for those companies outside US, like WX, is going to trend lower.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 742239, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 8:32:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
WX $14.59 Down -0.04 -0.27%
WuXi PharmaTech (C… CAPS Rating: ****
CVD $46.55 Up +0.45 +0.98%
Covance, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
LLY $41.11 Down -0.05 -0.12%
Eli Lilly & Co. CAPS Rating: ****
VTIV.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
inVentiv Health CAPS Rating: *****
CRL $33.56 Up +0.21 +0.63%
Charles River Labo… CAPS Rating: ****
ICLR $21.93 Up +0.48 +2.24%
ICON plc (ADR) CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement