Drop-Dead Gorgeous Stocks

Recs

4

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

"The idea of buying a former superstar stock at a discount price certainly has its attractions, but you've got to make sure you catch the haft -- not the blade."

So goes the thesis of my weekly Fool.com column "Get Ready for the Bounce." Therein, I run the 52-week-lows list compiled by Nasdaq.com through the "wisdom of crowds" meter that we call Motley Fool CAPS. And out the other end comes a list of stocks that have fallen so far, Foolish investors figure they're just bound to bounce back soon.

But is there a way to cash in on fallen angels who've plummeted even further? Perhaps. If a stock that's fallen for one year straight has headroom, then maybe a stock that's fallen even farther, and longer, has room to soar back even higher -- in which case, an apparently left-for-dead stock could offer us a drop-dead gorgeous entry price. We're going to test that thesis today, starting with five stocks that just hit their five-year lows:

 

Recent Price

CAPS Rating

(5 max):

WuXi PharmaTech  (NYSE: WX)

$5.98

***

PHI Inc

$15.00

***

Arbitron (NYSE: ARB)

$14.03

**

Companies are selected from the "New 5-Year Lows" list published on MSN Money on Thursday. CAPS ratings from Motley Fool CAPS.

Left for dead? Or drop-dead gorgeous?
Each of the stocks listed above has shed between 50% and 80% of its value over the past year alone and currently sits at or near its five-year low. Wall Street has left 'em for dead, and Main Street isn't much more optimistic -- the best stocks on the list get only a half-hearted three-star rating.

Yet, today we see the softer side of the Crash. So many stocks have fallen so far already this year, that finally, at long last, fewer and fewer of them are hitting five-year lows. Why, we didn't even have enough five-year bottom-plumbers this week to fill out our full five-stock table! Begging the question: Could this be the bottom? And if so, is it time to go fishing?

If it is indeed time, then I must say that WuXi PharmaTech looks like the best bet of this last bunch of five-year-low stragglers. For those not familiar with the company, WuXi performs outsourced pharmaceutical research for such giants as Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY), Merck (NYSE: MRK), and Pfizer (NYSE: PFE). Why is that a good business to be in? I'll let our CAPS pitchers fill you in:

The bull case for WuXi PharmaTech

  • acbinvestor introduced us to WuXi earlier this year: "[WuXi PharmaTech] is the best drug research companies in China. With its huge talent pool and the enormous market potential in China, sky is the limit. By setting up the first life science award in China, [WuXi] solidified its leadership status in China. The move enables [WuXi] to establish close ties to Chinese officials, academic researchers, potential talent pool and other industry insiders."
  • According to CAPS All-Star tskephart: "Pharmaceutical R&D is a very expensive part of the pharmaceutical market. I feel their will be a paradigm shift on how global pharmaceutical companies approach research, one of the results will be more outsourcing and collaborations. WuXi is positioned well to take advantage of this shift."
  • The Fool's own TMFBiologyFool agreed back in May: "Pharma is trying to cut costs and there's no better place to get high quality scientists on the cheap than China."

And speaking of cheap ... WuXi sure looks the part. The company sells for a mere 11 P/E despite analysts agreeing that it will increase those earnings by about 25% per year over the next five years.

Because the company only reports its free cash flow at year-end, we don't know how much of those earnings are "real" right now. But last year, the company generated $25 million in free cash flow, and if WuXi is still growing as fast as the analysts think, this year should be even better. Meanwhile, WuXi has plenty of cash on the balance sheet and trades for only 1.2 times book value.

Now mind you, WuXi's not my favorite play on Chinese medicine. If push came to shove, I'd probably prefer China Medical Technologies (Nasdaq: CMED) over WuXi, and I like Mindray Medical (NYSE: MR) best of all. But that doesn't change the fact that any way you look at it, WuXi qua WuXi looks like a bargain.

Time to chime in
Of course, that's just my opinion. Click on over to Motley Fool CAPS and tell us yours.

Motley Fool CAPS : It's fun, it's free, and it just might make you famous.

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 1935 out of more than 120,000 members. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Pfizer and Eli Lilly are Motley Fool Income Investor picks. Pfizer is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Mindray Medical is a Rule Breakers selection. The Fool owns shares of Pfizer and Mindray Medical International. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2008, at 9:56 AM, michaellee1818 wrote:

    Back to Oct. 1, 2008. I posted the following comments. It is still true. The stock will drop further. I don't believe a drug research and develop company without its own intelectual properties will survive in the long.

    "Many reasons indicate bullish on the pharma research and development outsourcing companies are foolish:

    1. We saw the boom and failure of electronic outsources companies, like JBL, CLS, etc, in the late 1999 and earlier 2000.

    2. The management of big pharmas and small biotechs are not sure how these waves of outsources are going to benefit their drug discoveries efforts. So far every company seems just following the trend and rushes to find partners in India and China. But the results are not that good. I didn't hear anyone find a super chemical from their outsourse efforts. And the cost of outsources are going higher and higher and eventually going to level out with their internal research and development cost.

    3. The biggest problems with outsources are the intellectual protection. How can you trust your partners with countries like China and India even the baby food produced in those countries are not safe.

    4. Current big pharma and small biotech executives are mostly pursuing on cheat and quick results and forgot drug discovery needs serious,diligent scientific researches. Good drugs come with patient and detailed scientific studies. Relying on outside partners and solely focusing on commercial purpose won't be fruitful. This is why although the breakthrough of humangenone in the 1990's and big dollars spent following this by pharmas and biotechs were not fruitful. In fact the new drugs FDA approved in 2008 are less than the new drugs approved in FDA in 1982 when much less money was spent on drug R&D.

    5. Pharma executives and biotech alike will soon realized the efforts spent on outsource researches are really waste time and money. They will suddenly reduce the capacities of outsources. Just like in the 1990's, those executives believed in computer modelling can figure out a wonder molecule that ultimately didn't churn out anything. Most the computer modellers lost jobs later on. In later 1990's combinatorial technologies such as combinatorial chemistry seems solved the bottleneck of drug discovery. That didn't work out either. Most of the combinatorial departments in big pharmas were ultimately dissolved.

    6. Like the electronic outsourcing conpanies, pharma outsourcing companies need huge investment and fast expansion in their research facilities and headcount expansions when contracts are signed. When pharmas and biotechs start to reduce or even stabilize their amount of outsorucing, the fix cost for those outsouring companies are going to huge. The already low margins are going to be even lower.

    In all, the evetual fate for these pharma and biotech drug research and development outsourcing companies are going to the same as electronic outsourcing companies in the 1990's. I think if Obama become the next president, the political hurdel of outsourcing researches to other countries are going to much higher. The stock price for those companies outside US, like WX, is going to trend lower."

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 785244, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 4:08:59 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Live Chat on India, China, and the Demise of the Dollar

Related Tickers

11/24/2009 3:52 PM
PFE $18.31 Down -0.22 -1.19%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
ARB $22.42 Down -0.28 -1.23%
Arbitron, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
MR $29.22 Up +0.08 +0.27%
Mindray Medical In… CAPS Rating: *****
MRK $36.22 Down -0.20 -0.55%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
WX $15.40 Up +0.10 +0.65%
WuXi PharmaTech (C… CAPS Rating: ****
CMED $12.99 Up +0.32 +2.53%
China Medical Tech… CAPS Rating: *****
LLY $37.25 Up +0.45 +1.22%
Eli Lilly & Co. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Two and twenty: Two and twenty or 2 and 20 (or other such variants) refers to a common hedge fund compensation structure.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!