Why Isn't Google Making a Netbook?

I've neglected something huge in my recent coverage of netbooks, those minimalist laptop PCs that generally cost less than $500.

Amid all of the hubbub over whether Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) should or shouldn't build a netbook, or reinvent the category altogether, I've failed to ask a critical question that should matter to us as investors: Why hasn't Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) built a netbook?

No single company has more to gain. Not Dell (Nasdaq: DELL  ) , not Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) , not Red Hat (NYSE: RHT  ) , and certainly not Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) . Only Intel (Nasdaq: INTC  ) gets close.

An atomic market, in every sense of the word
You might even argue that Intel has more to gain than Google does. After all, its relatively new Atom processor acts as the brains of many of Dell's netbooks. HP's, too. Were Intel to earn a decent margin on heavy Atom sales, billions would flow into its already flush coffers.

Trouble is, healthy margins may be hard to come by. Taiwan's Asus is already talking as if a $200 netbook is inevitable and Ma Bell has floated the idea of subsidizing some netbooks the way it does phones. Neither plan would help Intel's margins.

The company is concerned enough that, in December, a spokesperson told BusinessWeek that, while there's no sign of netbooks hurting sales of higher-margin laptop chips, executives are "watching it closely." I would be, too. The market for netbooks is still too small to sustainably support razor-thin margins.

Fortunately, Atom is a broad platform. Intel expects to sell the processor to makers of netbooks and smartphones. That Google isn't working with Intel to develop an Atom-compatible netbook OS is ... mystifying.

How to break Windows
Or maybe it is working with Intel, we don't really know. But if it isn't, CEO Eric Schmidt needs to call Intel chief Paul Otellini and start talking. Today.

Why? The PC as we know it is in flux. So are the platforms that run them. Consider Windows. Microsoft is rapidly closing in on the day when it can retire Vista in favor of Windows 7. XP, meanwhile, lives on for enterprise users who refuse to let go of a successful platform. (Can you blame them?)

And yet, even as these operating systems evolve, Microsoft is pouring billions into creating on-demand services via Windows Live and a cloud-computing platform that it calls Windows Azure. Call it the 2009 edition of the embrace-and-extend strategy that helped kill Netscape during the first browser wars.

Microsoft is vulnerable. Netbooks make it even more vulnerable. Dell says that one of every three Mini 9 netbooks it sells runs a flavor of the Linux OS -- Ubuntu, notably. And it's selling plenty: PC makers shipped nearly 15 million netbooks during 2008, reports ABI Research. Sales could double this year.

Let's go, Google!
Therein lies the opportunity. Buyers are getting increasingly comfortable owning something other than a Windows PC and, with netbooks, they're turning to the Web, rather than a fat hard drive, to get more of the software they use.

Good OS's Cloud is a good example. A very lightweight OS that's designed specifically for netbooks, Cloud boots directly into a browser and connects users with popular Web applications, including YouTube, Skype for phone calls, and Meebo for instant messaging. It's the OS that Google should have built, but didn't.

It's not too late. Two VentureBeat writers have already proven that Android can be a netbook OS, and Asus said in February that it would work with Freescale Semiconductor to create an Android-based netbook.

Google needn't limit itself to Android, but it needs to act. Set the netbook agenda, Eric Schmidt. Otherwise, the industry will set it for you. The netbook market is an unspoiled opportunity, free of Windows dominance. And it is the first computing platform that takes to cloud computing in a way that business users accept.

You want to break Windows? Break out a netbook OS.

Dell, Intel, and Microsoft are Inside Value picks. Apple is a Stock Advisor selection. Google is a Rule Breakers recommendation. Try any of these Foolish services free for 30 days. The Fool owns shares and covered calls of Intel.

Tim had stock and options position in Apple and Google at the time of publication. Check out Tim's portfolio holdings and Foolish writings, or connect with him on Twitter as @milehighfool. The Motley Fool is also on Twitter as @TheMotleyFool. The Fool's disclosure policy floats like a butterfly and stings like a bee.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2009, at 9:24 PM, cbhcbh wrote:

    The question, I thought, must not be serious. Google is not in the end-user hardware gadget business and I thought they had made it clear with Android that they did not intend to be.

    Your attitude about what Google should do ("set the netbook agenda") misses the current thinking that's proving successful. That is, assume a self-organizing system will emerge. Provide many doors for entering your domain of interest. Provide a layer of software that's platform-independent at the application level but can be implemented on any OS.

    Quit trying to tell Google what to do, that's just embarrassing!

  • Report this Comment On May 14, 2009, at 3:06 PM, agreatamphibian wrote:

    For Google to make a Netbook would be the height of foolishness - and not in a good way. The legal postion of any company owning the hardware platform, OS, and web services would be ***terrible***. Plus it would create conflict with and spook Netbook makers interested in putting Google's Android OS on Netbooks, which is where their real interest should be.

  • Report this Comment On May 14, 2009, at 3:17 PM, agreatamphibian wrote:

    Oh - and the Atom is unlikely to say the main Netbook CPU. That's likely to be the ARM, with its greater energy efficiency. Google Android alway runs on the ARM, btw.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 853557, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/16/2014 3:04:23 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement