Microsoft Blowing Its Bling on Bing

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) has always done a whiz-bang job of confusing its online search users. And it's about to get even worse.

Think I'm being unfair to the king of all software? Consider this litany of names for Microsoft's search service of the past, present, and future:

Brand

Verdict

MSN Search

Easy enough. This one's still around, too.

Live Search

Sinking in a sea of other Live brands, from rock bands to Regis to Canadian radio stations.

Windows Live Search

Think that's the same thing as Live Search? Think again. You get slightly different search results under the Windows Live moniker.

Kumo

Code name for the upcoming search interface overhaul. Okay, Kumosabe.

Bing

Rumored final name for the Kumo refresh.

Looking at that timeline, stretching back to 1998 or so, you can see the association with the mighty Microsoft brand itself diluting away to nearly nothing. MSN means MicroSoft Network after all, and Windows is one of its key products. Live at least means something to English speakers, while Kumo and Bing sound like random Scrabble letters picked out of a hat.

Compare this to Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) , which has stayed with one brand since birth a decade ago. Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO  ) may have switched search engine providers from Inktomi to Google to its own internal efforts, but the Yahoo Search name stayed the same. And Ask Jeeves simplified to Ask.com when IAC/InterActive (Nasdaq: IACI  ) took over operations -- but the Ask moniker stayed identifiable throughout its history.

Early reports say that Kumo/Bing is simply a new interface to the same back-end data you get from Live or MSN today. The new presentation of categorized links with snazzy Web 2.0-type mouse-over information looks great, but it's hardly groundbreaking stuff in the age of Wolfram|Alpha and the constant flood of graduating Google Labs features.

And Microsoft's problem in the search market isn't technical anyways -- it's a jumbled branding message. The $80 million to $100 million of bling that AdAge says Microsoft will spend on marketing Bing would have been way better spent on a name that reminds you of what you're using.

MSN Search too vanilla? Try Microsoft Search to keep the service in the family. Or how about Windows Search, sans Live? But no, Redmond had to go ahead and confuse us twice over with a foreign-sounding code name and a different but equally obtuse launch brand. This dithering explains why Microsoft isn't the king of the Internet, too.

Further Foolishness:

Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Anders Bylund owns shares in Google, but he holds no other position in any of the companies discussed here. You can check out Anders' holdings or a concise bio if you like. The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 28, 2009, at 7:39 PM, TMFBent wrote:

    Anders, I think you're way off on this one. Bing is organizing information in a much more useful way than Google or anyone else has ever tried.

    All Google really has is a brand. The results are no better than Live, and Yahoo's search is the worst, yet is number two in the space.

    This is a major step forward if it runs anything like it looks to run.

    Odd that the first real innovation in search in the past few years gets criticized by Google apologists as nothing new. Meanwhile Google, which hasn't invented anything for years, and just keeps buying stuff, is still hailed as an innovator, when it's basically just producing a jumble of ranked results and selling ads based on the popularity of those soso results.

    Sj

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 907610, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/29/2014 7:44:15 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement