Recs

1

The Wrap on Solar Earnings

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Well, Fools, it has been a riveting earnings season in the solar sector. I plan on sharing some broader conclusions later, but first, let's quickly glance at the final pair of results.

China Sunergy (Nasdaq: CSUN  ) reported negative gross margins for the first quarter, resulting in an operating loss. Like many others in the space, the cell maker is working off high-cost wafer inventories purchased last year. Prices have since plunged, requiring writedowns along the way.

On the brighter side, those lower input costs will soon restore margins to positive territory, even as soon as the second quarter. China Sunergy also pointed to positive operating cash flow during the first quarter, continuing a streak going back a year now.

Whereas investors were willing to look past current weak results in the case of Chinese compatriots like Solarfun Power (Nasdaq: SOLF  ) and Canadian Solar (Nasdaq: CSIQ  ) , China Sunergy isn't getting much love. One analyst pointed to the company's lack of vertical integration as a source of difficulty, and that's an idea I'll definitely return to in my broader story.

Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL  ) , meanwhile, today reported some of the highest margins of any solar module player. Gross margins came in a touch above the 15% to 17% range the company gave in its guidance, putting Trina Solar in Suntech Power (NYSE: STP  ) territory. Operating income improved roughly 74% from the previous quarter, to $6.8 million, while some one-time charges took net income into the red.

Trina Solar highlighted its $0.79-per-watt non-silicon manufacturing cost for multicrystalline products (higher-efficiency mono runs about $0.10/watt higher), which initially left me unimpressed. We'd recently seen Suntech Power hit $0.66 per watt, even with the drag from underutilized production lines, and that company is targeting $0.50 to $0.55 within a year or two. 

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Suntech Power is a Rule Breakers recommendation. Check out the high-powered subscriber service free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Toby Shute doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. Check out his Motley Fool CAPS profile or follow his articles using Twitter or RSS. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 28, 2009, at 4:45 PM, investinghobo wrote:

    Toby, tsl's .79/watt multicrystalline processing cost is from silicon to module, while stp's .66/watt processing costs is from wafers to module. Thus, you have to add ingot/wafer processing costs on top of stp's processing costs as a true comparison to tsl's numbers. Since stp is not as vertically integrated as tsl and doesn't produce wafers, you have to use two other listed wafer producer's processing costs - sol or ldk. ldk does not reveal their processing costs, but analysts estimate it's around .30/watt, or industry leading, while sol is around .36/watt processing cost from silicon to wafers. However you also have to keep in mind the blend between monocrystalline and multicrystalline numbers, since monocrystalline is more costly to process on the ingot side. As a last note, tsl's number does not include depreciation, while stp's does, so you have to add .05-.10/watt to tsl's numbers for fully loaded processing costs.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 908773, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 10:23:58 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:02 PM
TSL $5.90 Up +0.03 +0.51%
Trina Solar Limite… CAPS Rating: **
CSUN $1.20 Up +0.03 +2.56%
China Sunergy Co.,… CAPS Rating: **
STP $1.78 Down -0.15 -7.77%
Suntech Power Hold… CAPS Rating: ***
HSOL $0.95 Up +0.01 +1.06%
Hanwha SolarOne Co… CAPS Rating: *
CSIQ $3.14 Up +0.41 +15.02%
Canadian Solar, In… CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement