Dendreon Is No Dot-Com Story ... Yet

Recs

17

Disney Buys Marvel!

...And David Gardner called it. He's up 1,334%! See what David's recommending that you buy NEXT!

Click here now to find out!

We're a motley group here at The Motley Fool. There's no party line, and analysts often have widely different views on the same company. Heck, we even duel sometimes.

In an article yesterday, fellow Fool Daniel Harrison concluded that investors should stay away from Dendreon (Nasdaq: DNDN). For those who disagree -- and, from the comments, it seems there are a few of you -- I'm here to ride to the rescue. But only a little.

Daniel is right. (Hold your fire and let me finish.) Investors looking for more of the quick, triple-digit returns that Dendreon has given investors over the last few months should look elsewhere.

The question then becomes: Is Dendreon a bad buy at today's prices? And my conclusion is: Not if it gets cancer treatment Provenge approved. And there's the risk. More on this in a bit.

The easiest way to figure out if a development-stage drugmaker is a good investment is to figure out how much you think the company will be worth in a few years and then decide if the risk is worth the potential return. To ballpark it, here are a few companies that already have drugs on the market:

Company

Market Cap (in millions)

Revenue, TTM (in millions)

Price/Sales

Onyx Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ONXX)

$1,450

$704*

2.1

Amylin Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: AMLN)

$1,730

$837

2.1

Elan (NYSE: ELN)

$3,530

$1,030

3.4

Abraxis BioScience

$1,560

$336

4.6

Source: Capital IQ.
*Sales of Nexavar as reported by partner Bayer. TTM = trailing 12 months.

The first three all have marketing partners for their major drugs, which cuts down on their value. Dendreon, without a partner, will likely command a price-to-sales ratio more like Abraxis', possibly 5 or more. That might even be conservative, considering that higher sales of Provenge, compared to Abraxis' Abraxane, will increase operating margins, thus resulting in higher earnings. Earnings and cash flow are ultimately what companies are valued on.

Figuring out potential sales for Provenge, however, is a little difficult, because we don't know how much Dendreon will charge for the treatment. But it's not difficult to imagine annual sales hitting $1 billion in a few years. At a price-to-sales ratio of five, the market cap would then be $5 billion, about double what it is today.

Assuming it takes five years to hit that goal, that translates to roughly a 15% compounded annual growth rate from here. With conservative valuation models, I'm not sure that investors in large companies like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), or even Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) could expect returns like that over the next five years.

Of course, Dendreon isn't without risk. Provenge is not approved yet. Let me repeat that. Provenge is not approved yet, and investors who remember the spring of 2007 should have that burned into their brain. Having said that, however, with safety and efficacy data looking good, and the Food and Drug Administration having signed off on the clinical trial design, the risk of not getting an approval is fairly slim at this point.

The bigger risk might be that the company burns cash as a slow FDA takes awhile to approve the drug, but Dendreon has a couple of things working in its favor. First, the FDA had already looked at most of the data when it decided that the company needed more data to get approval in 2007. Second, and more importantly, metastatic prostate cancer is a debilitating disease that has few treatment options. I'm no lover of the FDA, but the agency is generally pretty good about getting decisions out in a timely manner when the drug treats a disease with few options.

Daniel wrote, "Buyers today should be making a serious long-term commitment," and I think he's right. In the short term, the stock market is a popularity contest, remember. With any approval for Provenge still at least nine months away by my estimate, it wouldn't surprise me to see the stock trade sideways for quite a while.

Where I think we disagree is in the view that "the uncertainty is still too high." Some people, Buffett included, think biotechs are scary. While I can point out the monster returns as justification to take the risk, ultimately each investor needs to make his or her own decision about risk tolerance.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Elan is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Coca-Cola is an Inside Value selection. Johnson & Johnson, Coca-Cola, and Procter & Gamble are Income Investor picks. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Brian Orelli, Ph.D., doesn't own shares of any company mentioned in this article. The Fool owns shares of Procter & Gamble and has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Spietroski wrote:

    You are correct, it does all depend upon approval and ultimately sales. I think it will get approved at this point (having been invested since 2007'), and I think it will be a success. The numbers in this article are quite conservative, but heck, I am OK with that! Multiple analysts are thinking in the 2-3 billion range anual sales when global sales are calculated. If those numbers do come through (big IF), then $26 per share here will seem quite cheap indeed.

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 5:21 PM, goinglong1000 wrote:

    maybe motley fool should consider covering the naked shorted shares

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 5:40 PM, nqe6 wrote:

    Having been proven wrong, Harrison should write his own retractions.

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 6:04 PM, TMFGebinr wrote:

    I wouldn't say that Daniel was proven wrong. He was pointing out a couple of reasons why an investor might consider selling Dendreon shares at this point. Many disagreed with him.

    As Brian pointed out at the beginning of this article, we live up to our Motley moniker by allowing different viewpoints. Group think is a dangerous thing for any investor to fall prey to.

    Cheers,

    Jim

    Fool editor

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 6:09 PM, danielkennedy2 wrote:

    Nice job driving in reverse gents - Again. Thank God I only read your comments re: DNDN and do not take them to heart. If so, I would have sold Dendreon just before it climbed to this level. Unfortunately I feel a lot of people may have hurt themselves financially taking your advice then when they set up their DNDN stocks for a stop-loss just before the 3rd Trial Data was released. Oh well - no skin off your nose - you just write what you feel is Foolish. Right?

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 6:22 PM, HologramMan wrote:

    The problem I had with the article yesterday was mostly that the guy who wrote out had about 50% of his facts wrong, including writing that Dendreon had 90 MM in cash when it really has 300 MM.

    If anything, the Fool writers should at minimum have fact checkers...

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 6:58 PM, JeffryD wrote:

    The stop loss killed me, but I jumped back in, hopeful that this drup is approved. One of my best friends Doctor is ready to prescribe it for him immediately if it is. He doesn't care if it might cost $25k a shot.

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2009, at 8:33 PM, NostraDodger wrote:

    I also, didn't take your advice! I'm glad I didn't.

    I'll take my chances, and thank you Fools to leave Dendreon out of your meaningless articles. Just shut it up!

  • Report this Comment On June 20, 2009, at 10:22 AM, HITMAN711 wrote:

    I have been an investor in Dendreon for about 4 years buying at lows and selling at highs. As a recovering cancer patient and having been through chemotherapy just to know how this can increase our quality of life during this time is a no brainer that the stock should soar and add the fact they now have financing from Duetche Bank and the plan to start producing the Provenge and have made plans to open more facilities throughout the country it should be a monster. This is where the government should step in and stop the short sellers from releasing false propeganda. If you don't like a stock don't buy it, short sellers in cases like this can hurt this company's ability to raise money and help people. Someday these crooked brokers and viscious shorts will be in need of a drug like Provenge and they will have made their money but whe you don't have the meds to help you all the money in the world can't help you. Sorry for venting Dominic

  • Report this Comment On June 20, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Crosh wrote:

    Taking anyone's advice without doing your own personal research is irresponsible. "Fool pros" weren't the only stock pros that missed out on this one; the sudden and profound increase in stock price reflects the "surprise" felt by many when DNDN first published its good news.

    That said, it seems incredibly unlikely that the FDA reject Provenge at this point. Anyone who is still advising hesitation on this highly undervalued stock could be costing people a lot of money.

    The same could have been said, of course, for what happened last time DNDN was in a position to get Provenge approved. An FDA advisory panel unanimously agreed that Provenge is safe, and overwhelmingly agreed that it worked. At that point investors had reason to be very optimistic that the FDA would approve, but they got shot down. This history may be too heavily influencing some investors and analysts today, as they recall the last time DNDN was a "sure thing." There is no such thing as a "sure thing" in investing, all you can do is consistently play your odds and even when there are a few flukes you should end up in a favorable position.

    If there was a roulette table somewhere with 95% odds that you double your money, or even 90%, would you play?

  • Report this Comment On June 20, 2009, at 6:25 PM, getrickqk wrote:

    There's always risk. But this time, even at $26 Dendreon is worth the risk. But I guess someone has to write something about something, and again persistent doubts and arguments against the long term prospect for FDA approval and commercial success is being rehashed under the veil of "honest discourse". May I point out that several analyst, including Adam Feurstein have changed their opinion and now have a very high favorable view towards FDA approval after the results of the Phase III trials have been officially announced. If anyone have not made up their mind to sell, hold or keep on buying, then it could be a long miserable time to wait and see what happens next.

  • Report this Comment On June 20, 2009, at 6:36 PM, Scientist007 wrote:

    See my pitch that I submitted (along with the red thumb) on June 16th (early morning)...Thank you guys (TMF) for showing both sides of the coin here. Limited upside, and now with the news that broke this morning (Saturday June 20th), it's uh, oh time for DNDN longs, imho.

  • Report this Comment On June 22, 2009, at 7:27 AM, tigggerkat wrote:

    Motley fools should be an extension of an online THE ENQUIRER magazine (gossip) ... only meant for entertainment . What you read has some facts but it is like a "Where is WALDO?" puzzle ... "Where are the facts?". Freedom of speech should not be abused or it becomes "Cry Wolf" constantly looking for attention but carries no real message.

  • Report this Comment On June 22, 2009, at 7:27 AM, tigggerkat wrote:

    Motley fools should be an extension of an online THE ENQUIRER magazine (gossip) ... only meant for entertainment . What you read has some facts but it is like a "Where is WALDO?" puzzle ... "Where are the facts?". Freedom of speech should not be abused or it becomes "Cry Wolf" constantly looking for attention but carries no real message.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 925261, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 12:51:42 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $60.75 Up +0.45 +0.75%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
PG $61.85 Up +0.81 +1.33%
The Procter & Gamb… CAPS Rating: *****
AMLN $12.30 Up +0.23 +1.91%
Amylin Pharmaceuti… CAPS Rating: ****
KO $55.48 Up +0.99 +1.82%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
DNDN $29.31 Up +0.70 +2.45%
Dendreon Corp CAPS Rating: **
ELN $6.51 Down -0.07 -1.06%
Elan Corp, plc (AD… CAPS Rating: ****
ONXX $26.66 Up +0.06 +0.23%
Onyx Pharmaceutica… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Borrowing: Borrowing is the process of getting the loan of an asset from another entity usually in return for interest.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!