Why You Shouldn't Jump off the First Solar Wagon

Recs

35

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

When I visit my hometown of Philadelphia, I go straight to Pat's Cheesesteaks on 9th and Passyunk Avenue and order one up with whiz. I'll admit it: There are awfully long lines, the steaks are sloppy, and oftentimes the quality is unpredictable. But when they're good, they're really good. It's high-risk, high-reward.

The same can be said for leading solar energy company First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR). Despite a 6% price drop from last week's high due to a continued decline in polysilicon prices and fear about First Solar's growth sustainability, it's still a risk worth taking.

Why it's the market leader
There's good reason First Solar is the darling of Wall Street (or at least it used to be).

  • It closed yesterday near $162, off its 52-week high of $301. The company boasts a PEG ratio of 0.56, well below the industry average and those of two of its strongest competitors, SunPower (Nasdaq: SPWRA) (Nasdaq: SPWRB) and Suntech (NYSE: STP).
  • With first-quarter earnings jumping 24% from last quarter and 253% year over year, it's easy to see why analysts are expecting a five-year growth rate of 39%.
  • Not to mention the fact that the Obama administration plans on spending $150 billion on renewable energy in the next 10 years. Couple that with solar growth in Germany and you have a global agenda that has helped the company secure about $6 billion in future commitments.
  • Furthermore, in a renewable world where cost competitiveness is the name of the game, First Solar is the global market leader, with the lowest solar manufacturing costs in the industry ($0.92/watt).

Why everyone is down on it now
I know, I know. Phoenix Solar, arguably First Solar's largest customer, recently adjusted its earnings downward and warned of pressure on margins, not to mention the decline in prices for solar modules.

And, oh yes, there's also the rapidly falling price of silicon helping to remove First Solar's cost competitiveness and providing companies that utilize polysilicon wafers, like Yingli Green Energy (NYSE: YGE) and Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL), a substantial advantage over First Solar. There seems to be a question about how long prices will remain depressed -- which is one of the main reasons everyone seems so down on First Solar -- so let's just take a moment to evaluate.

Supply
Polysilicon, like every other commodity, abides by the laws of supply and demand. Although silicon is the world's second-most-abundant resource, it has to be refined to a purity of 99.99% in order to be useful in solar and electronics applications, and therefore it becomes an extremely capital-intensive process. This puts polysilicon in somewhat limited supply.

Demand
On the demand side, poly remains a required material for the semiconductor industry. With the continual extension of globalization and PC distribution and the bursting evolution of PDAs and smartphones (and thus computer chips), semiconductors are constantly in demand. Just take a quick glance at recent cell-phone usage numbers in the most rapidly developing markets:

  • China: Population: 1.34 billion; 547 million cell-phone users.
  • India: Population: 1.17 billion; 362 million cell-phone users.

Furthermore, information provided by research firm Gartner Inc. says that worldwide PC replacements will rebound strongly in 2010-2011. This, coupled with its prediction that PC sales will grow by more than 10% in 2010, sets the stage for a strong PC recovery.

If you ask me -- looking at supply and demand -- I don't see the current low poly prices as sustainable if producers get hit with increasing demand on both the electronics and solar fronts.

Where does that leave us?
I'm not going to lie: As with those delicious cheesesteaks, First Solar comes with many risks. Technology is rapidly changing. R&D costs are abundant. Competition is fierce. And with 95% of First Solar's revenue coming from abroad, a sudden change in foreign demand could dry up a once-juicy appetite.

Should you buy First Solar with money you may need in the next few years? Absolutely not. But if you have time to buy and hold, and won't get finicky about commodity prices or the next market bottom, in my opinion First Solar is still the best and brightest of the solar bunch.

Related Foolishness:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Jordan DiPietro doesn't have a position in any of the companies mentioned above; you can check out his CAPS profile. Suntech Power Holdings is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 01, 2009, at 5:16 PM, PVSOLAR wrote:

    What is this "substantial advantage" that Trina and Yingli supposedly have over First Solar? I wonder if anyone ever does any research before posting this stuff? Here is a hint: even if polysilicon was free, the overhead cost of manufacturing crystalline solar modules is around $.80/Watt and poly is currently somewhere around $70/Kg on the spot market. This means that Trina, Yingli, etal can (at best) produce crystalline Si modules for around $1.40/Watt. Today, First Solar's production cost is around $.92/Watt. So, where is this "advantage" to the crystalline guys, of which you speak?

  • Report this Comment On July 04, 2009, at 4:15 PM, piseke wrote:

    Do you think Obama's direction for green energy will take us to the larger scale solar projects or will there be a variety of the smaller, mid, and larger scale projects subsidized by the gov. thanks for your comments

  • Report this Comment On July 15, 2009, at 2:49 PM, TMFPhillyDot wrote:

    I don't think it will necessarily be the administration's direction that will dictate the scope of projects; rather, the amount of competition in the private sector and the ability for large scale M&A.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 932983, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 8:21:00 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
STP $15.18 Down -0.81 -5.07%
Suntech Power Hold… CAPS Rating: ****
TSL $44.46 Down -1.11 -2.44%
Trina Solar Limite… CAPS Rating: **
YGE $13.75 Up +0.01 +0.07%
Yingli Green Energ… CAPS Rating: ****
FSLR $121.18 Up +0.05 +0.04%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Uncertainty: Uncertainty is an inability to ascertain the true current state or to determine or predict future outcomes.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!