Will Renewable Energy Be the Equivalent of Tech in the Go-Go '90s?

Investors are constantly searching for the next "it" space. Could renewable energy be the one?

Brad Nordholm, CEO of Starwood Energy, the energy investment affiliate of private equity firm Starwood Capital, said in a recent interview that renewable energy has "huge" growth prospects.

"The next couple of years I think we're going to go through a process that you see with any rapidly growing area -- Internet in the late 90s, for example," Nordholm said. "Like any process, there are going to be winners and losers, but for the well-capitalized companies that have experience in this space, we think the opportunities are great."

A "sunny" spot
The economics of solar power are becoming very attractive in the United States, according to Nordholm. "The technology is improving and the pricing for solar power is decreasing," he said.

"We see solar power as becoming increasingly competitive with other sources of renewable power generation as well as conventional power generation." Nordholm says he expects solar power to reach "grid parity" -- when solar power is on par with conventional forms of generation -- in three to five years.

Specifically, he points to a combination of (1) improved competitiveness in pricing of wholesale energy and (2) the mandate for renewable energy that comes from state and federal renewable portfolio standards (RPSs) as the driving force behind utilities that seek renewable energy.

In the first five months of this year alone, U.S. utilities issued requests for proposals for over five gigawatts (GW) of renewable wholesale energy, according to Nordholm. About half the states have RPSs, which set goals for the percentage of electricity that must come from renewable sources by a future date. Nordholm also said that for these RPSs to be met, new renewable energy will need to be developed in the next 10 years to satisfy the existing renewable portfolio standards.

The federal climate energy bill that sets the federal RPS has currently passed the House, but remains in the Senate. Nordholm says the pace for adoption of renewable energy may accelerate (the federal RPS standard is being proposed at lower levels).

Nordholm's private equity firm has teamed up with Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT  ) to pursue solar generation projects in North America. The two companies signed a deal in May with Arizona Public Service to build the world's largest dispatchable solar energy plant. Nordholm says Starwood Energy is currently working on solar plant configurations that range from 75 MW to 290 MW and expects more deals to materialize in the second half of 2009 and into 2010.

Takeaways
I spoke with Nordholm about areas other than solar. Though he runs a private equity outfit, his thoughts can apply to retail investors. I've tried to distill some of his key takeaways:

Traditional forms of energy aren't passe investments.
Nordholm says significant firms are making investments in oil and gas exploration and production and other areas right now. As oil prices have recovered, Nordholm says smart people are reemerging to invest in that space.

"Oil prices have rallied substantially, while natural gas in contrast has remained rather flat," he said. "As the economy improves, the demand for these commodities will also increase, and I would expect to see some further recovery of those prices." Well-positioned traditional energy concerns could still make for good investments.

Europe isn't as attractive as it used to be.
Europe has been significantly ahead of the U.S. in terms of investing in renewable energy, including solar. According to Nordholm, Europe obtains more than 25% of its energy from renewable sources.

As a result, now that Europe has reached some of its goals, he says the market is slowing down a little but generally remains very favorable. For prospective solar investors, take note that the upside in profitability for European solar is good, but it may not be as good as before.

China is poised to post explosive growth in the renewables area.
China has just announced huge policies to promote the utilization of photovoltaic solar in communities across China. "It's very quickly going to become the largest photovoltaic solar market in the world," Nordholm told me.

Nuclear energy will experience a renaissance.
Nuclear will enjoy somewhat of a renaissance, Nordholm says, but it will be done by very large firms that have the operating history and expertise necessary to operate nuclear power plants.

What to do with this info
While you and I probably don't have our own private investment pool of dollars, it's definitely worth paying attention to the renewable energy "megatrend."

Investors seeking exposure to the solar space broadly should consider Claymore/MAC Global Solar Energy (NYSE: TAN  ) or Market Vectors Solar Energy ETF (NYSE: KWT  ) .

Major holdings of these ETFs, including SunPower (Nasdaq: SPWRA  ) , First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR  ) , Suntech Power (NYSE: STP  ) , and Yingli Green Energy (NYSE: YGE  ) , are expected to gobble up a piece of the utility-scale solar market.

But beware if you're looking at individual companies: If you invest in them for the solar projects they're currently taking on, be careful that those companies have their financing secured. Nordholm says that some of the new renewable technologies are not yet financeable by banks.

For Related Foolishness:

Fool contributor Jennifer Schonberger does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. Suntech Power Holdings is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (12)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2009, at 5:47 PM, nin4086 wrote:

    "Will Renewable Energy Be the Equivalent of Tech in the Go-Go '90s?"

    No. There are fundamental differences between the two. In the 90s, IT was a technology which was believed to have more applications and more value than it really had. It was a "solution looking for problems".

    In contrast, the renewable energy market is a well known and real problem (albeit a little exaggerated by the environmental aspects...I am not implying that global warming is not bad; I am saying no one will pay for solving that part). However, the current solution is too expensive and this is well known. That is why, unlike the IT sector that grew rapidly to a bubble and exploded, I expect the renewal energy sector to evolve gradually as the science progresses and proves itself.

    [It is easy to test if a solution solves a given problem. It is not that easy to find real problems that a given solution solves.]

    Another difference is that there was abundance of capital during the tech boom whereas capital is scarce today.

    Just my 2 cents!

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2009, at 10:33 PM, xetn wrote:

    The best solution for clean, sustainable power generation is nuclear, but everyone thinks it is too dangerous and nobody wants one in their back yard. It takes around 12 years just to get approval, and up to 20 years to get one built. Once in operation though, it is quite, clean, and efficient. The safety record of nuclear is very good and except for the Russian experience, has been exceptional. The French experience has been great and they currently generate over 40% of their needs from nuclear.

    The problems with other alternatives are storage for solar when the sun does not shine, and what about wind when there is no or insufficient wind? Would you want surgery in a hospital that relied on one of these methods? At best, they are only useful for adjunct sources of energy and only "cost effective if subsidized by governnment.

  • Report this Comment On July 04, 2009, at 11:06 AM, WishToRetire2 wrote:

    Nuclear is not sustainable. there's a finite amount of it and when it runs out that's it.

  • Report this Comment On July 05, 2009, at 6:02 PM, DDHv wrote:

    There are a few forms of AE that pay off now. Solar heating and DHW, for example. In many climates, the best investment is an installation. Finding a good stock - now that is hard!

  • Report this Comment On August 08, 2009, at 8:53 PM, Gardnermiles wrote:

    THERE IS ENOUGH NUCLEAR RESOURCES TO POWER THE U.S. FOR MANY DECADES. WISH TO RETIRE 2 JUST HOW MUCH ARE YOU LOOKING FOR?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 933820, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/17/2014 7:14:04 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement