Make Millions From Thousands

Recs

3

could write this article the usual way -- by showing you how to turn your thousands into millions through investments in solid, well-known companies. Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), for example, has returned an average of 24% annually over the past 20 years, while Walgreen (NYSE: WAG) has averaged 14%. Not too shabby.

But can such returns turn your thousands into millions? Yes, eventually. An investment of merely $10,000 would turn into $1 million in 30 years if it grew at an annual average of 17%. But that's a fairly steep rate to count on for your stock investments -- a number to which only a select few master investors can aspire. It's safer to have more conservative expectations -- perhaps closer to 10%, the stock market's historical average annual return over most of the past century.

A fine balance
So, what should you do if you don't want to wait 50 or more years to make millions? Here's one option: Take a few chances.

With most of your money, you shouldn't take crazy risks. Consider socking much of it away in a broad-market index fund, such as the Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX). That low-cost fund should earn you close to the market's historical return over long periods of time. You might also try S&P 500 Depositary Receipts, an exchange-traded fund also known as SPDRs. Either of these options will instantly invest your money in 500 major American companies, such as Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) and Merck (NYSE: MRK).

But once you've done that, take a few chances, and supplement your index with growth-stock picks. That's what I'm doing in my own investment account. I don't want all of my money in an index fund because I'd like my portfolio to grow faster than average. Instead, a chunk of my nest egg sits in a variety of individual stocks.

This strategy should help moderate volatility, and it can also allow you to do well with carefully chosen stocks. It definitely aided me in turning $3,000 into $210,000. (It can also help you zero in on great stocks the Street misses.) If you don't believe me, read Fool Paul Elliott's account of how one stock can change everything. He describes how $1,800, the cost of a fancy TV, can turn into $190,000, the value of an entire home -- provided you break some rules.

Aiming for the stars
Such returns, which come from classic Rule Breaking companies, are too tempting for me to ignore. That's why I'm still on the lookout for young, dynamic companies that are breaking the rules as they grow and prosper.

The kinds of companies I'm talking about are tomorrow's MasterCard (NYSE: MA), Automatic Data Processing (NYSE: ADP), and Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA). Think about how different the world was before them. We had to carry enough cash or checks to pay for whatever we wanted to buy, and we had to have the funds available. Companies had to prepare their own payroll and manage their own employee benefits, no matter the cost. Television was limited to just a few stations you could pick up with your antenna.

Even Ford was a Rule Breaking company once, daring to make a luxury item available to the masses at an affordable price. Just try to imagine a world without cars.

Find a few rockets
Seeking out and investing in Rule Breakers requires patience and entails risk. However, just one growth rocket has the potential to supercharge an otherwise stodgy index strategy.

If you're interested in adding some turbo-boosters to your own portfolio, consider our Motley Fool Rule Breakers service. You can try it free for 30 days, including full access to all past issues and every previous recommendation. Headed by Fool co-founder David Gardner, Rule Breakers pays special attention to cutting-edge fields such as biotech, alternative energy, and nanotechnology. Check it out to learn more.

This article was originally published on July 7, 2006. It has been updated.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Microsoft and an S&P 500 index fund. Intel and Microsoft are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Automatic Data Processing is a Motley Fool Income Investor selection. The Fool owns covered calls of Intel. The Fool is investors writing for investors.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 10:50 AM, kirkhilles wrote:

    I normally don't comment on stuff like this, but when I see "Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), for example, has returned an average of 24% annually over the past 20 years" I have to say something.

    That's extremely deceiving. The impression they are trying to give is that Microsoft day-in and day-out gives you a 25% return. Do me a favor. Look at their chart. Adjusted for today's price (22.51), the price back in January 1990 was around 0.65. That would've given you a 34,000%+ return in less than 20 years.

    But what if you had bought it a decade later, January 2000? The price then was nearly 49.00. That'd give you a nice 55% LOSS over almost a decade.

    Sure, they'd like to give you the impression that companies like Microsoft would again post those type of gains again, but everybody knows that they won't. Its SO easy to pick winners AFTER the fact, but very very few people can do it successfully and reliably.

    Do yourself a favor: buy lots of indexes, pay off debt and play it safe or do your research and prepare for the possibility of major losses. There's no such thing as a "24% annual return" stock.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Stephanie2045 wrote:

    Stop recommending Merck. They are poisoning our children with their aluminum adjuvant that is a known neuro toxin, causes motor neuron death in animal studies.

    Stop promoting these corporate criminals. Most people

    do not want their product.Look at the VAERS database,

    think about the thousands of victims, they had produced.

    The long term effect is going to be as bad bad as Vioxx

    was. All their books,flyers, journals should be burned.

    Recommend stocks and companies who truly DESERVE to be supported and clean operators.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Bamafan68 wrote:

    Again, I will take issue with blanket statements that have an agenda. As a counterpoint: think about the thousands of victims of cervical cancer annually. Think about the adverse effects of radical hysterectomies and pelvic radiation. Compare the numbers of cervical cancer deaths in the US annually vs the incidence of serious adverse vaccine related events.

    Full disclosure: I am an ob/gyn. I have operated on women for cervical cancer, treated them with radiation, treated the complications, and watched them die. I am biased.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 11:49 AM, portefeuille wrote:

    Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), for example, has returned an average of 24% annually over the past 20 years, while Walgreen (NYSE: WAG) has averaged 14%. Not too shabby.

    --------------------

    same story since 1997 i guess ...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COxfPDjl1dc

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 11:57 AM, portefeuille wrote:

    I feel somewhat sorry for you selena. I guess they just don't let you write the interesting stuff. You should really talk to your boss ...

    --------------------

    She sports a B.A. in anthropology from Brown University, a master's in teaching from Brown, and an M.B.A. from Wharton.

    --------------------

    (from here http://www.fool.com/about/staff/SelenaMaranjian/author.htm)

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 11:58 AM, portefeuille wrote:
  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 12:05 PM, portefeuille wrote:

    Before arriving at Fool Intergalactic HQ way back in 1996, she taught high school history in Maine, amused herself at an administrative post at Harvard, and worked briefly in the "real world" in Manhattan.

    --------------------

    Now I really feel sorry for you. 1996, and the video was from 1997!

    Harvard and Manhattan sounds good. It is never too late!

    Or, as I said, you should just have a long talk with your boss!

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2009, at 12:19 PM, portefeuille wrote:

    ..., and has written a number of Fool books, among other things.

    --------------------

    Maybe I should have a look at those. Do you have a list?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 936818, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 4:03:51 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 3:47 PM
INTC $19.67 Up +0.01 +0.05%
Intel Corp CAPS Rating: ****
MSFT $29.75 Down -0.26 -0.87%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
MA $242.53 Down -0.46 -0.19%
MasterCard, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
MRK $36.78 Down -0.10 -0.27%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
WAG $38.02 Down -1.35 -3.43%
Walgreen Company CAPS Rating: ****
CMCSA $14.94 Down -0.02 -0.13%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Pro forma: Pro forma means "for form" or "for form's sake" and is from the Latin. For financial statements, it is an "as-if" situation.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!