How Google Stopped a Bidding War for YouTube

Recs

6

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

You think Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) paid too much for YouTube? Well, you're in good company: CEO Eric Schmidt knew all along that he was overpaying -- by a lot.

CNET News, a tech publication owned by CBS (NYSE: CBS), got hold of court documents from YouTube's long-running copyright battles with Viacom (NYSE: VIA). In these legal transcripts, where Schmidt spoke under oath, you see the magnitude of Google's willingness to pay way more for YouTube than the company was worth.

The video-sharing site was worth no more than $700 million when Google launched its $1.65 billion offer, by Schmidt's own estimate. But YouTube was -- and still is -- a fast-growing phenomenon that draws millions of eyeballs every day, and the unrealized potential to make money and control online traffic patterns was worth an extra $1 billion.

Schmidt explained that extraordinary circumstances demanded extraordinary measures. "In the deal dynamics, the price is not set by my judgment or by financial model or discounted cash flow," he said. "It's set by what people are willing to pay. And we ultimately concluded that $1.65 billion included a premium for moving quickly and making sure that we could participate in the user success in YouTube."

In other words, that extra billion kept YouTube out of the hands of Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), and possibly other companies with ambitions of online dominance. News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) had recently paid $580 million for social media site MySpace, and other media giants might have had their eyes on YouTube. If Google hadn't made this serious commitment right away, we might have seen a multiparty bidding war erupt -- and YouTube might have been a Disney (NYSE: DIS) property today, for all we know. Stranger things have happened.

Some might say that Google has yet to figure out how to make money from this expensive acquisition, but I respectfully disagree for a number of reasons. YouTube was a smart buy for Google -- if you take a suitably long view of the investment.

Which side do you take, dear Fool? Share your views in the comments below.

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Walt Disney is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. Walt Disney and Microsoft are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Anders Bylund owns shares in Google and Disney, but he holds no other position in any of the companies discussed here. You can check out Anders' holdings and a concise bio if you like, and The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2009, at 4:37 PM, SekouMurphy wrote:

    Presuming that the $700M was a good valuation for current and discounting future cash flows/eyeballs/etc., you're saying that paying 136% over fair value is a good deal?

    Hmmm...I think a more plausible reason (yet, conspiracy laced) is that the main venture capitalists who backed Google were also backing YouTube and wanted to make out large (perhaps to rocket-boost portfolio returns, pocket the carry and/or make up for losses from other investments)...I would not doubt one bit that this was a factor.

    I blog at www.Phrenzie.com

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1002060, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/5/2009 5:12:05 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Dumbest Stimulus Plan to Date

Related Tickers

12/4/2009 4:00 PM
MSFT $29.98 Up +0.15 +0.50%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
CBS $13.46 Up +0.69 +5.40%
CBS Corp CAPS Rating: **
YHOO $15.19 Up +0.08 +0.53%
Yahoo!, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
GOOG $585.01 Down -0.73 -0.12%
Google, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
DIS $30.84 Up +0.51 +1.68%
The Walt Disney Co… CAPS Rating: ****
VIA $31.49 Up +0.29 +0.93%
Viacom, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Gross income: * For companies, Gross income is revenue minus the cost of goods sold. Also called gross profit. * For workers, Gross income is earnings before taxes are taken out or other adjustments are made. The figure after adjustments is net income.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!