2 Big Bills for Solar

Recs

5

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

It's rather fitting that California's state animal is the grizzly bear. The Golden State has been one of the hardest states hit by the recession, with unemployment rising to 12.2% in August, and budget woes mounting.

Despite these macro difficulties, California has not abandoned its very ambitious renewable energy goals. Last month, Governor Schwarzenegger signed an executive order boosting the state's Renewable Portfolio Standard to 33% by 2020. This week, the state took several steps to advance its arguably quixotic quest.

On Sunday, the Governator signed a bill that allows homeowners to get paid by utilities for the excess electricity generated by their solar arrays (or wind installations). Utilities like Pacific Gas & Electric (NYSE: PCG) already credit customers for excess generation under current net metering rules, but unused credits get wiped out at the end of the year. Now utilities have to either roll those credits over, or pay for the excess electricity.

Another piece of legislation signed into law on Sunday expands the state's feed-in tariff (FIT), which was launched last year. The project cap has been doubled from 1.5 megawatts to 3 megawatts. That keeps the focus on homeowners and commercial users like Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) and eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), rather than higher-profile utility-scale projects that run into the hundreds of megawatts. The FIT program is also now capped at 750 megawatts, up from 500 MW.

Last year, the consensus was that California's FIT rate was set too low, since utilities were only required to offer the going rate for electricity from a gas-fired power plant. The result, according to California's Public Utilities Commission (CPUC): "While this program has been effective at attracting landfill gas, small hydro, and some biomass and small wind projects, the program has not resulted in any solar development."

This new iteration of the FIT offers little in the way of improvement. A spokesman from Suntech Power (NYSE: STP) confirmed this, commenting that the bill "won't result in a high enough fixed price to stimulate solar projects." The head of First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR) backed SolarCity, a leading installation firm that's going great guns lately, was also definitive in its dim assessment of the program.

Companies like SunPower (Nasdaq: SPWRA) and Recurrent Energy appear to be holding out hope for an alternative FIT plan, proposed by CPUC this past August. The commission is pushing for a market-based pricing mechanism, in which projects would go to the lowest bidders at auction. Yingli Green Energy's (NYSE: YGE) showed the pitfalls of such an approach, but I do think this could be a powerful program if crafted correctly.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Wal-Mart is an Inside Value selection. First Solar and Suntech Power are Rule Breakers recommendations. eBay is a Stock Advisor pick. See if you take a shine to any of our newsletters with a free 30-day trial.

Fool contributor Toby Shute doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. Check out his CAPS profile, or follow his articles using Twitter or RSS. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 14, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Rasbold wrote:

    About bloody time!!

    Arnold always balances his bad moves with good ones.

    I will be happy when PG &E has to pay me straight tiered rates from .08/kWh to .44 per kWh. depending on how much power I give them. Yes, California is the golden land of the 700 dollar electric bills (3.5MW) for my house average. Solar is looking better and better every day.

    The fact that NEW JERSEY is kicking Cali's arse in solar power production per capita makes me want to puke!

    Ever been to New Jersey?

    What Would Warren Do???

    We are buying!

    May Your Dow Never Jones!

  • Report this Comment On October 14, 2009, at 3:54 PM, FreeCleanSolar wrote:

    Installing solar panels at your home or business makes good economic sense, and these latest developments will only improve the attractiveness of solar.

    For example, if you spend $200 per month for electricity, then you will spend $81,979 over 25 years, including a low annual price inflation rate of 2.5%. No matter how you calculate it, you will save money with a $5,000 to $25,000 solar panel system. Remember, you can pay the utility for 25 years, with annual price increases, or you can pay a lot less with solar power.

    To do something about this today visit <a href="http://FreeCleanSolar.com"> FreeCleanSolar.com </a>to search a nationwide network of 300 local solar panel installers representing most every solar panel brand including Sunpower, Kyocera, Sharp and Sunwize. You can also find information about state solar rebates, federal tax credits, solar financing and leasing, system costs and the benefits of going solar. The bottom line is that many homeowners and business owners can afford solar power today. The prices are down 25% this year and the government incentives have never been better.

  • Report this Comment On October 15, 2009, at 3:53 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    I dont need to install solar on my rooftop, because I use only one room most of the times in my house. I dont heat or cool the rest of the house at all. Just one room and I wear underwear thermal all the times. It is not as bad as living out in the streets. I dont understand why people dont put on extra warm clothings to cut down utility bills. I use a room air conditioner instead of my central air condtioning. I dont see any point of installing a crummy solar array on my roof. I rather see my local utiltiy install megawatts of solar itself.. Ah, I never use my clothes dryer at all. I hang clothes indoor to dry during wintertime.. I also built my own heliostats made of aluminium foil to reflect sunlight back against the northern side of my house which never saw the sun year around. The sunrays doesnt have to come in one direction because you can reflect the wasted sunrays back to your house in your backyard or frontyard depending on your location. You can also reflect sunrays from the east or west anyhow. Just keep it simple..

  • Report this Comment On October 15, 2009, at 3:57 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    I dont think there will be many takers of roof top solar because they will need to buy new cars anyday.. They will keep on postponing the solar thing indefintiely.. Buying an fuel efficient car is preferable than installing a solar rooftop, because we will cut demand on oil more directly than with a solar rooftop. There is priorities to think about... I am sure that fuel efficient cars is high in the list.. I dont think we want to keep buying gas guzzlers and turn around to install solar rooftops.. This is an lousy energy policy in my opininon..

  • Report this Comment On October 15, 2009, at 4:00 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    Our economy came to a grinding stop not because of stupid bank finances, but because of $4.50 gasoline in the summer of 2008. Oil prices remains menacingly high at $75 or $3 a gallon even during the bottom of our economy. We have not begun addressing the questions of future demands on oil & gas at all, because there is ignorant assumptions that we can always fall back on coal . Dont be fooled by today's oil glut seemingly..Oil traders are not that stupid..

  • Report this Comment On October 15, 2009, at 4:01 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    Oil shareholders are sitting quietly on hands and smiling like smirks...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1006729, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 2:05:12 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:01 PM
PCG $42.10 Up +0.57 +1.37%
PG&E Corp CAPS Rating: *****
STP $15.18 Down -0.81 -5.07%
Suntech Power Hold… CAPS Rating: ****
WMT $54.28 Down -0.26 -0.48%
Wal-Mart Stores, I… CAPS Rating: ****
YGE $13.75 Up +0.01 +0.07%
Yingli Green Energ… CAPS Rating: ****
EBAY $22.79 Down -0.40 -1.72%
eBay, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
FSLR $121.18 Up +0.05 +0.04%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Delisted stock: A delisted stock is one whose fundamentals no longer meet the requirements of the NYSE or the Nasdaq.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!