This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

6

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
Is it time to buy Yingli Green Energy (NYSE: YGE)? Depends on whom you ask. According to the solar specialists at Janney Montgomery Scott, there's no better play on the coming Solar Revolution than Yingli, which Janney calls "a major price setter" in the photovoltaic market.

Janney observes that Yingli is "currently shipping more than its current nameplate capacity." In conjunction with "other evidence that prices are beginning to stabilize," Janney predicts that "[a] combination of strong demand, better credit, and stable supply" will yield robust sales for Yingli, improved margins, and ... an upgrade from neutral to "buy."

Not so fast
HSBC, however, begs to differ. In a series of solar ratings issued this morning, HSBC places Yingli at the bottom of the solar stack. Rather, HSBC thinks Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL) you're your best play in the solar space. Suntech Power (NYSE: STP) got an upgrade to "neutral" on the back of last week's announcement of a major Chinese push into rooftop solar panels. But Yingli? Not only did HSBC downgrade the stock; it dropped it two full slots -- all the way from "overweight" (buy) to "underweight" (sell).

Buoyed by news of the positive Trina initiation and Suntech upgrade, investors have bid both stocks up strongly. But here's the really interesting bit: Investors are also buying Yingli, disregarding HSBC's bearish rumblings, and latching onto Janney's happy-talk instead. Is that the right call?

Let's go to the tape
To get a few clues to the analysts' relative skill in picking solar stocks, we turn to Motley Fool CAPS, where we're been tracking each stock shop's performance for more than three years now. What we find in the public record, however, is far from encouraging:

Stock

Janney Says:

CAPS says:

Janney's Picks Lagging S&P By:

SunPower (Nasdaq: SPWRA)

Outperform

***

15 points

First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR)

Outperform

**

27 points

FuelCell Energy (Nasdaq: FCEL)

Outperform

**

41 points

Investors seem very optimistic now that Janney's turned positive on Yingli Green Energy. Yet, literally every time Janney has picked a solar stock to outperform in the past, the stock has done the opposite. Now for HSBC's record:

Stock

HSBC Says:

CAPS says:

HSBC's Picks Beating (Lagging) S&P By:

Yingli

Outperform

****

10 points

Applied Materials (Nasdaq: AMAT)

Outperform

****

(8 points)

Suntech Power

Outperform

****

(57 points)

So the picture's not much better here. HSBC's 1-for-3 in the solar space, getting its picks wrong twice as often as right. Yet regarding the stock in question today, it's undeniable that HSBC was right about Yingli last time it picked it to outperform. It's also worth pointing out that across the broader spectrum of stocks these investing houses track, Janney is scoring less than 50% for accuracy, while HSBC gets more than 52% of its recommendations right -- and ranks in the top 10% of investors we track.

Blinded by the obvious ...
Of course, HSBC's record isn't the only reason my vote goes to the bears today. The fact is, I'm pretty pessimistic on most of these stocks -- the one Janney upgraded, but also the ones HSBC likes. My reason basically boils down to this: Cash burn.

You see, Janney thinks Yingli will earn $1.12 next year, $1.39 in 2011, and so is selling for about 10 times what it will earn two years out. Cheap, right? Well, maybe, if those reported profits were worth the paper they're printed on. But in fact, Janney still expects Yingli to lose money this year, and generally speaking, this whole industry has a pretty miserable record of producing free cash flow.

... and burnt by the sun
None of these companies -- Yingli, Suntech, or Trina -- is in the habit of producing cash flow statements with its quarterly earnings releases, so it's hard to say exactly where the industry is at this year. What is clear, though, is that over the last five years, Yingli has succeeded in burning through nearly $700 million in cash. Trina has burned almost $500 million, and Suntech, more than $800 million.

Lacking substantial cash flow, these companies have been forced to "rely on the kindness of strangers" to fund their operations. Yingli, Trina, and Suntech have each tapped the equity markets for more capital in recent months.

Foolish takeaway
Cash burn and incessant rounds of dilutive share issuances illustrate that the solar industry still has trouble standing on its own. My advice: Be wary of 'em all and put your money in Exxon, a company with a history of profitability and free cash flow. Maybe solar will turn profitable in the future, maybe not -- but oil is earning profits today.

Love this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

First Solar and Suntech Power Holdings are Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendations. Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of, nor is he short, any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating about stuff he does understand under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 726 out of more than 140,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2009, at 4:45 PM, greenworld wrote:

    Within the context of this article, the author does a disservice to The Fool. Since the article's focus is the solar world, I find the inclusion of FuelCell Energy both in the graph and chart misleading. What does FuelCell Energy, a manufacturer of fuel cells have to do with the solar market? Maybe the author can shed some light on the comparison. True, both are considered under the alternative energy or green energy umbrellas, but I question its inclusion in an article written about solar power plays. While the author has made his feelings well known concerning FuelCell Energy in previous articles, Mr. Smith appears to have motives other than simply comparing the current state of solar companies.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2009, at 6:09 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    Oil prices are climbing chiefly because we want to protect our greedily biased investments in oil stocks. We are perfectly willing to ignore how much pain it had been inflicting on regular people who cannot afford high gasoline prices. We never bothered to encourage them to carpool or conserve energy more thoroughly as it should be. We are still soft pedaling on alternate energy so not to spoil our mouth-watering profit opportunities in oil investments in the future. We seem to intentionally choose the slowest path to alternate energy by overemphasizing on rooftop solar installments over larger solar installments around towns or out in the deserts. We are not going to grow fast enough in alternate energy with roof top solar installments and it will mean that oil prices is far more likely to hit back with ever higher prices. We dont want alternate energy producers to be more competitive against oil and gas producers. We wear alternate energy masks to make green people happy , but we still favor oil & gas investments as a surer bet.. Our economy just cannot tolerate this behavior any longer.. Our government is doling out trillions in bailouts primarliy because of our greedy behavior with oil investments.. Banks is not too big to fail,,, Oil companies is far bigger to fail and we love it...

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2009, at 6:09 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    Oil prices are climbing chiefly because we want to protect our greedily biased investments in oil stocks. We are perfectly willing to ignore how much pain it had been inflicting on regular people who cannot afford high gasoline prices. We never bothered to encourage them to carpool or conserve energy more thoroughly as it should be. We are still soft pedaling on alternate energy so not to spoil our mouth-watering profit opportunities in oil investments in the future. We seem to intentionally choose the slowest path to alternate energy by overemphasizing on rooftop solar installments over larger solar installments around towns or out in the deserts. We are not going to grow fast enough in alternate energy with roof top solar installments and it will mean that oil prices is far more likely to hit back with ever higher prices. We dont want alternate energy producers to be more competitive against oil and gas producers. We wear alternate energy masks to make green people happy , but we still favor oil & gas investments as a surer bet.. Our economy just cannot tolerate this behavior any longer.. Our government is doling out trillions in bailouts primarliy because of our greedy behavior with oil investments.. Banks is not too big to fail,,, Oil companies is far bigger to fail and we love it...

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2009, at 6:17 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    An ordinary green minded person has no clue or idea how much work is needed to establish solar or wind as a dominant player in the energy production around the world... Installing 5 kilowatt on each rooftop will take almost forever to become energy independent or "dominant" in the energy picture. We cannot knock every door and sign contract paper and drive back and forth to complete one rooftop solar job a time... We should forge ahead with bigger installments around towns for own local uses with direct help of Washington DC instead of handing tax credits to lucky wealthy homeowners. Rooftop solar installments has to wait ... I ask you why we are still wriggling out of the oversupplies of solar modules.. because it is so damn slow to get one rooftop solar job done... We need gigawatts and even terawatts of solar and wind power to unseat oil producers out of the seat of power.. The Sun is not waiting for us.. It is already beaming energy at us and we are too blind to figure it out..

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2009, at 6:18 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    An ordinary green minded person has no clue or idea how much work is needed to establish solar or wind as a dominant player in the energy production around the world... Installing 5 kilowatt on each rooftop will take almost forever to become energy independent or "dominant" in the energy picture. We cannot knock every door and sign contract paper and drive back and forth to complete one rooftop solar job a time... We should forge ahead with bigger installments around towns for own local uses with direct help of Washington DC instead of handing tax credits to lucky wealthy homeowners. Rooftop solar installments has to wait ... I ask you why we are still wriggling out of the oversupplies of solar modules.. because it is so damn slow to get one rooftop solar job done... We need gigawatts and even terawatts of solar and wind power to unseat oil producers out of the seat of power.. The Sun is not waiting for us.. It is already beaming energy at us and we are too blind to figure it out..

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2009, at 6:23 PM, frtedcrilly wrote:

    I dunno why fuel cells are included in a solar argument, but I do see their potential to replace both wind AND solar! Why? They are weather and climate neutral, relatively cheap, can utilize various fuels from ethanol, methanol, natural gas, to propane and even bio-methane, and there are already companies (see CFU Australia) selling domestic units that produce too much electricity, so the excess is sold to the grid, and the by-product...the best bit, is all the hot water you need for your home! I get a feeling big oil is not going to like these guys... Yes I own them, but I am not in the industry, I'm a healthcare professional.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2009, at 7:26 PM, lomaxlovescrocs wrote:

    As green energy becomes more dominant that will mean oil and gas producers will wane in influence. Trillions of dollars invested there will be sold and put into green energy investments. As for now, oil investors are still bidding their time , it is entierely up to all of you to push hard for faster implementing of green energy by pushing local utilties to move faster on green energy instead of dragging feet. As of now, oil & gas investors are still angiling for another profitable cycle this time around. We will be paying through our noses at the pump to the tune of $6-7 a gallon simply because we are not serious enough soon enough...

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2009, at 10:23 AM, TMFDitty wrote:

    testing...

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2009, at 10:24 AM, TMFDitty wrote:

    testing...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1044516, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2010 9:42:18 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is This Bull Over?

By The Motley Fool

Is This Bull Over?

Related Tickers

2/9/2010 4:03 PM
TSL $23.13 Up +0.02 +0.09%
Trina Solar Limite… CAPS Rating: **
STP $13.01 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Suntech Power Hold… CAPS Rating: ****
YGE $12.70 Up +0.30 +2.42%
Yingli Green Energ… CAPS Rating: *****
FSLR $113.29 Down +0.00 +0.00%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
FCEL $2.66 Up +0.04 +1.53%
FuelCell Energy, I… CAPS Rating: **
AMAT $12.15 Up +0.08 +0.66%
Applied Materials,… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Commodity: A commodity is something that is bought or sold in commerce but has no measure of differentiation. No matter who produces it, it's essentially the same; like a bale of hay.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!