Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Hostile Takeover? More Like Nice Guy Showdown.

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK  ) has taken off the boxing gloves and put on oven mitts. The headlines say the pharma has gone "hostile" in its attempts to takeover Human Genome Sciences (Nasdaq: HGSI  ) , and I guess that's technically true as it announced a plan to take its $13-per-share offer directly to shareholders. But this is one of the nicest hostile takeovers I've ever seen.

No name-calling. No accusations that management is crazy for wanting more. No vice-presidential-debate-style insults a la Illumina (Nasdaq: ILMN  ) and Roche. I wouldn't be shocked if the tender offer was delivered with chocolate and flowers.

There's a good reason Glaxo is keeping it civil for now; the two are partners on their lupus drug Benlysta. It's hard to dish it out in press releases and then have to go into meeting and make marketing decisions with the company you just insulted.

Human Genome said it'll take a look at the tender offer and let shareholders know their recommendation within 10 business days of when Glaxo makes it official. Considering the biotech rejected a private offer at the same price, it won't take that long. It looks like Human Genome is trying to be just as civil about this.

Being nice is probably the best move at this point, but it's not the best way for Glaxo to win over shareholders. Not that any would tender at this point anyway; they could get a higher value selling on the open market.

It seems like this tender offer is just to make sure everyone knows Glaxo is still interested and perhaps willing to play a little hardball at some point. The pharma says it doesn't plan to enter the bidding process because it doesn't need to do due diligence. That sounds reasonable, but if Human Genome is able to find a higher bidder, it'll need to respond or lose the company.

Most people think it's unlikely that another investor will ride in and save Human Genome, which seems reasonable given that Glaxo controls 50% or more of most of Human Genome's assets. I'd remind investors, though, that Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY  ) came in and topped Bristol-Myers Squibb's (NYSE: BMY  ) bid for Bristol's partner ImClone Systems. Sometimes, half an asset is still worth buying for a desperate pharma.

That said, there's no way to know how this one will play out, which makes it hard to estimate the risk-reward proposition. I think Glaxo probably will offer more to get the deal done, but I'm not sure a small bump in price from here is worth the risk that Glaxo packs up its oven mitts and goes home.

David Gardner and his team at Rule Breakers aren't counting on an acquisition to get solid returns from one of their recent health-care picks. Find out what it is and why they like it in the Fool's free report, "Discover the Next Rule-Breaking Multibagger."

Fool contributor Brian Orelli holds no position in any company mentioned. Click here to see his holdings and a short bio. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Illumina and GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 15, 2012, at 2:02 AM, mrdupont2011 wrote:

    Motley Fool has simply turned into a churn and burn advice mill, no matter whether one hand states the opposite of the other, we are supposed to swallow it all.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1885244, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2016 3:03:00 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 days ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/21/2016 4:02 PM
GSK $41.13 Down -0.30 -0.72%
GlaxoSmithKline CAPS Rating: ***
HGSI.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Human Genome Scien… CAPS Rating: **
BMY $50.02 Down -0.34 -0.68%
Bristol-Myers Squi… CAPS Rating: ****
ILMN $141.80 Down -1.03 -0.72%
Illumina CAPS Rating: *****
LLY $78.25 Down -0.49 -0.62%
Eli Lilly and Co. CAPS Rating: ***