Your Asset Allocation Is All Wrong!

Recs

19

What proportion of your investment portfolio is in U.S. stocks? Half? Two-thirds? More?

Chances are, you should reduce your exposure to U.S. stocks a bit. Or even a lot. In his latest book, When Markets Collide, Mohamed El-Erian says the proper weight of U.S. stocks in a long-term investor's portfolio is only 15%!

What about the other 85%?
"U.S.-based individual investors have too much invested in the U.S. and not enough internationally. That exposes them to significant risk in this world," El-Erian told Barron's recently. He suggests the following allocation:

Equities

49%

U.S.

15%

Other Advanced Economies

15%

Emerging Economies

12%

Private

7%

Other Asset Classes
(bonds, real assets, etc.) and special opportunities

49%

Expected Long-Term Real Return

5%-7%

Source: When Markets Collide.

So who is this guy? Why should you pay any attention to his recommendations? He is co-CEO and co-chief investment officer of PIMCO, one of the largest bond managers in the world, and is ultimately responsible for more than $800 billion in assets under management.

And lest you think his expertise is contained to the bond world, you should know he returned to PIMCO in 2008 after two years at the head of Harvard's endowment fund. Harvard invests across the full spectrum of asset types, and in its last fiscal year under his leadership, the fund grew 23% to reach $34.9 billion -- a remarkable performance that substantially beat its market and internal benchmarks.

In other words, he might be on to something.

What's Your IQ?
So, what's your IQ (international quotient)? Look at the following table of blue-chip U.S. companies and their foreign counterparts. How many names in the second column do you recognize?

U.S. Company

Foreign
Counterpart

Headquarters

Foreign Counterpart
Market Cap

Abercrombie & Fitch
(NYSE: ANF)

Hennes & Mauritz

Sweden

$44 billion

Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT)

Carrefour

France

$46 billion

Kraft Foods (NYSE: KFT)

Groupe Danone

France

$39 billion

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)

Reliance Industries

India

$77 billion

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)

Alcon (NYSE: ACL)

Switzerland

$49 billion

American International
Group (NYSE: AIG)

Ping An Insurance Group

China

$56 billion

Source: Yahoo! Finance.

While no one is suggesting you need to dump most of your U.S. stock holdings immediately, it's likely that your portfolio would benefit from more exposure to non-U.S. stocks.

The Foolish bottom line
There's a natural bias toward investing in your home market -- and that bias has served U.S. investors pretty well over the last century. In this new century, however, international stocks can no longer be considered peripheral; they've become a core element of a sound long-term investment strategy.

And that leaves individual investors with a real challenge. Investing abroad presents a whole new set of risks and caveats -- not to mention tax issues. One solution might be to invest more heavily in U.S. companies that earn (or expect to earn) a significant proportion of their revenues abroad.

But if you'd like to invest in companies based outside the United States, another option is to subscribe to the Motley Fool's Global Gains investment service, and let Bill Mann and his team do the legwork for you. 

We mean that literally. Bill and co. just returned from a tour of Asia where they visited promising, solid companies and ferreted out new investment opportunities. If your portfolio could use more foreign flavor, sign up for a 30-day free trial.

Alex Dumortier , CFA, owns shares of Wal-Mart but no other companies mentioned in this article. Kraft and Johnson & Johnson are Motley Fool Income Investor recommendations. Wal-Mart is an Inside Value selection. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 18, 2008, at 1:01 AM, lrecap wrote:

    You really do not believe the above do you. I do have some PIMCO, but as an individual fund owner, I pay 4.5% front end and high yearly - - most gains go to PIMCO. Yes they have a great reputation but for an individual, not sure that is where/what you should be doing - - Harvard or not. lre

  • Report this Comment On June 18, 2008, at 10:29 AM, TMFMarathonMan wrote:

    Hi Irecap,

    Thanks for your comment. Nowhere in the article do I suggest that individuals invest in PIMCO's funds -- in fact, I'd usually recommend individuals refrain from paying a 4.5% front load on top of high annual fees, no matter what the pedigree of the manager.

    Alex Dumortier (XMFMarathonMan)

  • Report this Comment On June 18, 2008, at 7:26 PM, GoNuke wrote:

    Your Global Gains team's performance is not very good. The Canadian portion of my portfolio has outperformed the Global Gains Portfolio by quite a margin. I have also cobbled together a Canadian watch list merely based on companies that have been mentioned by analysts in free publications or were top holdings in interesting Canadian equity mutual funds. If I had invested in these companies I would have experienced an average return of about 20 -25% in the last few months. Few if any of the companies on this list are oil producers because I tried to limit the list to Canadian companies not covered by CAPS. Global Gains is an expensive newsletter with poor returns. I think they could reduce their costs and improve their returns by simply looking more at Canada and Mexico. Canada generates the same kind of data that your screens use and it is pretty cheap to call a Canadian CEO from the US. I heartily suggest you pay more attention to Canada. There are a number of almost pure China plays here because China is the major buyer of what some Canadian firms produce. I have business connections in China and Japan and my impression is that your team does not understand the Asian culture enough to carry out credible analyses.

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2008, at 8:23 AM, TMFMarathonMan wrote:

    GoNuke,

    Thanks for your comment and for your suggestion to look at Canadian stocks more closely.

    I think it's still a bit early to tell whether or not Global Gains' returns are poor; however, the average GG recommendation is currently outperforming the S&P 500 and the MSCI EAFE by 4.5% and 3.8%, respectively.

    On the issue of the GG team's knowledge of Asian culture, both Bill and Nathan Parmelee have lived and worked in Asia and they continue to visit the region on a regular basis. I can confidently assert that they are quite familiar with Chinese and Japanese business cultures.

    Alex Dumortier (XMFMarathonMan)

  • Report this Comment On June 23, 2008, at 7:02 AM, cityhunter66 wrote:

    I don't know about you, but i certainly don't feel much better if my portfolio is outperforming the S&P 500 and STILL post below zero percentage returns. (Currently, GG sports a minus 3% returns compared to the other motley fool newsletter services.)

    Given the amount of diversification touted by the service, is it fair to say that stocks in this newsletter ought to fare slightly better when global markets tank? Since you guys are supposed to be picking out the strongest market leaders globally...or is that not the case?

  • Report this Comment On June 23, 2008, at 10:06 PM, mgiv wrote:

    Oh BS. I'll take any one of those top head fund managers on.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 666333, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 8:55:01 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $60.75 Up +0.45 +0.75%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
XOM $72.85 Up +0.69 +0.96%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
ANF $37.59 Up +2.58 +7.37%
Abercrombie & Fitc… CAPS Rating: **
ACL $147.29 Up +0.55 +0.37%
Alcon, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
AIG $36.18 Up +0.70 +1.97%
American Internati… CAPS Rating: **
WMT $52.00 Up +0.75 +1.46%
Wal-Mart Stores, I… CAPS Rating: ***
KFT $26.53 Down -0.25 -0.93%
Kraft Foods, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

International fund: An international fund is a mutual fund that invests in the stocks of foreign countries. They vary widely. Check the prospectus for details of which countries or groups of countries are represented in a given fund.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!