Will China Starve the World?

Recs

12

A little more than 10 years ago, a man named Lester Brown published a book titled Who Will Feed China?, which he described as a "wake-up call for a small planet."

His thesis was that a rapidly developing China would put an unprecedented strain on global food and water supplies, primarily because industrial parks would replace China's farms, and the demand for food -- and particularly for less-efficient food such as meat -- would only increase as China's enormous population grew wealthier.

In the time since that book was published, China has indeed grown wealthier. And in 2003, for the first time in its history, China became a net importer in agricultural trade -- a position it's held ever since.

Is this the end of the world as we know it?

The good news is that I don't think it is. The better news is that there are a few stocks out there that will make sure we profit alongside a sustainable solution. But I'll get to those in a minute.

First: There is a very real problem here
I recently saw a presentation on China's agricultural future by Colin Carter, a professor of agricultural and resource economics at the University of California, Davis. China's first and foremost problem, according to Carter, is one of productivity.

According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, China has 40% of the world's farmers -- yet just 10% of the world's arable land. Taken together, that means its agricultural operations are generally small-scale, hard to manage, and woefully inefficient. Carter also pointed out that although farmers are 40% of China's labor force, they produce less than 12% of the GDP. Finally, China has produced just 1% yield growth over the past 10 years, while the U.S. has increased its own yields by approximately 2.5% annually.

For a country seeing a rapidly increasing demand for food, these are damning statistics. It means that without substantial improvements to efficiency, the world will see rapidly rising food prices and the possibility for food shortages as the Chinese government -- flush with cash -- buys up more and more of global supply. This could ultimately lead to countries, fearing scarcity, shutting down their agricultural export markets, which would have an enormous slowing effect on the global economy.

It's not just China
Now, China is not alone in straining global food supplies and driving up prices. Ill-advised ethanol mandates, for example, have increased the price of corn and induced farmers to grow corn instead of wheat or soybeans, which in turn has driven up the prices of the latter two commodities as they have become less available.

And this has reverberated throughout the market. Since cattle in the U.S. are largely fed on corn, beef and milk prices have increased. The same goes for chicken and their eggs. That not only results in more expensive trips to the supermarket, but also puts profit pressures on companies such as Tyson Foods (NYSE: TSN), Chipotle (NYSE: CMG), and Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) -- all of which have seen their stocks suffer as a result.

In other words, this is a truly global problem that many actors are looking to solve. And that provides opportunities.

That brings us to the stocks
Although China has improved its agricultural sector over the past 25 years, government-led efforts have largely focused on achieving food self-sufficiency. Now, however, smaller farms are being consolidated, specialized, and set up to take advantage of China's enormous agricultural labor market -- which is leading toward a focus on maximizing yield from the land and selling the excess production on the free market.

There are two additional catalysts that will provide investors a way to profit from China's move toward sustainability: the introduction of genetically modified (GM) seeds to the marketplace and the widespread distribution of advanced fertilizers. As Carter noted in his presentation, "There would be an instant boost in productivity ... offering huge economic benefits to farmers."

The opportunity in China for GM seeds probably brings to mind Monsanto (NYSE: MON), DuPont (NYSE: DD), and Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW), three giants in the field. Indeed, it's with GM seeds that Carter believes China's biggest opportunity exists. But those companies are locked out of China.

Although the Chinese government got out of the seed production and distribution business in 2007, it still mandates that no seed production company in China be more than 49% owned by foreigners. China, however, has its own GM technology, and small players such as Origin Agritech (Nasdaq: SEED) stand to capitalize from the commercialization of GM seeds across China.

The fertilizer business isn't subject to similar restrictions, but the Chinese market is so fragmented that multinationals like Scotts have difficulty branding and marketing their products. So while companies such as Potash Corp. stand to benefit as sources of raw materials, the best opportunities to profit from the distribution of fertilizer in China lie with the domestic producers that have established brands as well as the capital to absorb their competitors and build out nationwide distribution networks.

The world is not doomed
If China increases access to GM seeds and fertilizers and rationalizes its agricultural industry, we're likely to see reduced food inflation rates and perhaps even China's return to being a net exporter of agricultural commodities -- which would help keep prices down and avoid global food shortages. And while this would be good for companies and consumers worldwide, it would be particularly beneficial to the people who have invested in the companies that will drive this agricultural revolution forward.

At Motley Fool Global Gains, we seek to identify global megatrends and then identify the best of the companies that stand to benefit. The need to increase agricultural production is only one of the megatrends we're following right now. We're also recommending companies that are meeting the world's energy demands, enabling global flows of capital, and providing the burgeoning middle classes around the world with new phones, cars, and even branded luxury sunglasses.

You can read about all of our recommendations and see all of our country and stock research by joining the service free for 30 days. Click here for more information -- there's no obligation to subscribe.

Tim Hanson owns shares of Starbucks and B shares of Chipotle. The Motley Fool owns shares of Starbucks. Chipotle is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems and Rule Breakers recommendation. Starbucks is a Stock Advisor and Inside Value pick. Dow is an Income Investor choice. The Fool's disclosure policy is hoping to soon be recognized as a bank holding company.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 22, 2008, at 2:22 PM, venkytalks wrote:

    The problem of agriculture is lack of globalisation and political divisions preventing free trade.The world can support 35 billion humans if they were vegetarian. But if people have to be non-veg, it will be necessary for the Chinese to import from surplus countries. With WTO talks breaking down, food prices are likely to be jacked up by surplus countries - and high food prices will be one more expense head which the Chinese will have to bear. Food price inflation in China will increase salaries and hence manufacturing cost, reducing the price advantage of Chinese goods.

    Another problem faced by China and India is that modern farming does not require to be so labour intensive - quite the reverse. Neither country is in a position to absorb some 500 million people into manufacturing, if modern farming reduces labour intensivity. GM crops and higher fertiliser use may increase yield, but currently the people are used to low investment high return scenario. Higher input cost will be difficult to bear by small farmers. Freak weather can decimate a small farmer without crop insurance, which again increases input cost. Uneven bumper harvest with consequent price erosion also plays havoc with the calculation of a farmer - price of corn in brazil may dictate profit margin in India. It may be necessary to enter into commodity options market - again increases input cost.

    To put things in perspective, since I dont know much about China, India has about 150 million hectares of arable land (same as China) and produces 200-220 million tonnes of cereal at about 1.5 to 2 tonnes per hectare. The average farmer holds about one hectare of land. He invests about 100 dollars to sow and reaps about 400 dollars worth of cereal per annum. Some 150 million families and 700 million individuals exist on farming. They eat their own output at about 100-150 Kgs per individual and sell the remaining to intermediaries. Any change from this 2000 year old economic practice is extremely difficult - the number of displaced farmers is just too much to absorb anywhere else. The Chinese are of course doing a very good job of switching, but the numbers still dont quite add up, so it remains to be seen if they ultimately succeed. Any down turn in manufacturing is likely to be disastrous for Chinese agriculture sector.

  • Report this Comment On September 23, 2008, at 2:52 AM, BigDufChoit wrote:

    Few Words for the stats...Inner and Outer China

  • Report this Comment On October 05, 2008, at 1:10 AM, gamma65 wrote:

    The equity and bond markets have benefited from a long period of low inflation, but ongoing and massive central bank liquidity injections point to a far less benign environment of elevated inflation ahead. Research by our firm, Agcapita Farmland Investment Partnership (Calgary, Canada based agriculture private equity firm – www.farmlandinvestmentpartnership.com) shows investors must be prepared to rotate into asset classes with different characteristics. During the last commodity bull market & high inflation period in the 1970’s, equities materially underperformed farmland.

    - Western Canadian farmland went from around $100/acre to $550/acre (550% total return and 176% in inflation adjusted terms);

    - Cash held in a money market account barely kept ahead of inflation (6% inflation adjusted return); and the

    - S&P 500 index returned less than 2% per year (a loss of almost 50% in inflation in adjusted terms)

    We believe the world is still in the early stages of this current commodity bull market. When agriculture commodities prices are compared against their previous inflation adjusted highs they are significantly discounted implying scope for further increases:

    - Corn is US$ 5/bushel currently compared to US$16/bushel in 1974,

    - Wheat is US$ 7/bushel currently compared to US$27/bushel in 1974

    - Canadian farmland is C$ 660/acre currently compared to C$1,100/acre in 1981

    Another interesting metric is the long-term average ratio of the Commodities Research Bureau Index versus the S&P 500 which is currently around 1.5 times. Simplistically, this ratio indicates how much S&P 500 stock you can buy with a fixed basket of commodities. Some important points:

    • During the commodity bull market of the 1970s, the ratio was consistently higher than 2 times for over 10 years – it peaked at almost 4 times.

    • The ratio is currently at around 0.5 times - significantly below the 1.5 times long-term average, just slightly above the 0.15 all time low reached in 1999/2000 and still very far below the almost 4 times multiple reached in the last commodity bull market. We still appear to be at an all time low relative valuation between “hard assets" versus "stocks.”

    • If history is a guide, the ratio of hard assets to stocks will have moved much higher before this commodity bull market is over.

    • How? Stocks will continue to fall and/or commodities will continue to climb – most likely a serious combination of both as investors, fearing inflation, rotate out of stocks into commodities – the cycle of “inflation, rotation, hard assets”.

    Agcapita is a Calgary based, agriculture private equity firm that allows investors to cost effectively allocate a portion of their portfolios to hard assets in the form of Canadian farmland via its professionally managed Agcapita Farmland Investment Partnership. Agcapita Farmland Investment Partnership is the third in a family of private equity funds which has grown to almost $100 million in assets under management. Agcapita’s investment team has over 40 years private equity and fund management experience and over $1 billion in total career transactions and previously managed a group of emerging market funds with almost C$500 million in assets for one of the largest banks in Europe.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 733553, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/23/2009 12:31:33 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Buffett Bought Retail. Should You?

Related Tickers

11/23/2009 12:01 PM
DD $34.89 Up +0.38 +1.10%
E.I. du Pont de Ne… CAPS Rating: ****
SEED $8.97 Up +3.76 +72.17%
Origin Agritech Lt… CAPS Rating: ***
TSN $12.91 Down -0.17 -1.26%
Tyson Foods, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
DOW $28.19 Up +0.26 +0.93%
The Dow Chemical C… CAPS Rating: ****
SBUX $21.82 Up +0.41 +1.91%
Starbucks Corp CAPS Rating: **
MON $80.00 Down -0.08 -0.10%
Monsanto Company CAPS Rating: ****
CMG $85.05 Up +1.17 +1.39%
Chipotle Mexican G… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Collection agency: A collection agency is an organization that specializes in the collection of overdue debts. They are best known for hassling people who owe money by telephone or in person with a knock on the door.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!