Will Obama End Global Trade?

Recs

17

Disney Buys Marvel!

...And David Gardner called it. He's up 1,334%! See what David's recommending that you buy NEXT!

Click here now to find out!

How will President-elect Obama affect your portfolio? Keep reading our special series for the lowdown.

Global reaction to Barack Obama's historic election as president of the United States was generally one of respect, admiration, and excitement for both American democracy and the new leader of the free world (though Russia was a notable exception). But when it comes to what an Obama administration will mean for the world's investment climate going forward, there are a few sticky and unresolved issues.

On the sticky side, we have free trade. On the unresolved side, there's China. We'll start with the former, and you can read on for the latter.

Free trade
Obama's stance on trade is a nuanced one. Though he noted in an October 2008 presidential debate that "Not only is it impossible to turn back the tide of globalization, but efforts to do so can make us worse off," he told the AFL-CIO in 2007 that "people don't want a cheaper T-shirt if they're losing their job in the process" and stated frequently that he will "eliminate tax breaks for companies that are moving jobs overseas."

This has caused some worry in India -- a country whose economic growth in recent years was largely built on the backs of outsourcing behemoths such as Satyam Computer Services (NYSE: SAY), Wipro Technologies, and Infosys (Nasdaq: INFY). Sixty percent of the industry's revenue comes from America, and the country's economy and burgeoning middle class are already suffering from a slowing global economy and increased competition for accounts from lower-cost locales such as the Philippines and Eastern Europe. 

If the American companies that outsource jobs -- and it's a really long list, including the likes of Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN), Dell (Nasdaq: DELL), and Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) -- are forced to bring those jobs back to the United States, the previously fast-growing Indian economy could see a significant near-term slowdown.

The Indian government and industry representatives, however, remain hesitantly optimistic. The country's finance minister told The Times of India that Obama "will realize that this is an inter-connected world," while others noted that Obama's support for an expanded H1B visa program will help more Indian engineers find work with American companies.

Elsewhere ...
Obama has also opposed free trade agreements (as currently negotiated) with South Korea and Colombia, and has said that he'd like to renegotiate NAFTA with Mexico and Canada. While Obama's campaign literature will tell you that his goals are fairer trade, more assistance for displaced American workers, and greater global environmental protections, there is some global worry that an Obama administration might impose and sustain protectionist policies in order to reward labor union support for his campaign and get our economy back on its feet.

Time will tell, of course, but if this were the case, then it would spell trouble for countries such as China, Japan, Canada, and Mexico, the largest sources of U.S. imports, as well as for the numerous countries for which the U.S. is the largest export market. The trouble wouldn't stop there, however. As we have seen with the subprime mortgage mess, which spiraled into a global financial crisis, knock-on effects can be a doozy.

Let's say, for example, that Chinese toy manufacturers continue to see diminished demand for their wares. That would cause more of them to go out of business, which would cause economic growth in Guangdong province (a manufacturing hub) to slow. That means lower demand for steel (since construction will slow as displaced workers cease buying new apartments and cars), which in turn hurts Vale's (NYSE: RIO) operations in Brazil and Rio Tinto's (NYSE: RTP) operations in Australia.

Got all that? Though we're skeptical that an Obama administration would end global trade as we know it (sorry, AFL-CIO), a scan of the world's newspapers showed that a number of Asian countries are concerned about U.S. protectionism, while Latin America discounts the notion that Obama and a Democratic Congress are a real threat to free trade in the region.

Getting back to China
The foreign reaction to Obama's election that matters most, however, is China's. That's because this country of 1.3 billion citizens and $1.8 trillion in foreign exchange reserves is poised to become a major global player over the next decade. Yet, as Foreign Policy noted here, China policy went largely unaddressed during the election.

China's leaders seem to be taking a wait-and-see attitude toward President-elect Obama. They sent a bland message of congratulations to the new president, and the state-run China Daily newspaper printed an editorial that reads as though most of it were written before it knew whether Obama or his rival, Sen. John McCain, would be elected.

Obama would like China to stop keeping its currency weak and start enforcing stricter quality standards on its manufacturers. China would like Obama to fix the U.S. economy so that we start buying more of their exports again. But it's hard to discern what exactly either side's plans are for our burgeoning relationship. This remains a crucial relationship for the U.S. to continue to develop, and one that international investors will want to watch closely.

As for the rest of the world ...
Indonesia is another emerging market that's been hit hard for the financial crisis, but its citizens were predictably pleased that Obama, a former resident of the country, won the election. The Jakarta Post reported that students at Menteng Elementary -- one of Obama's alma maters -- are waiting expectantly for "Barry's" triumphant return.

Folks in Vietnam, however, were not quite as pleased. It turns out the country has built a rather warm relationship with Senator McCain, the man it once imprisoned. Though not opposed to a President Obama, many thought a President McCain would have done a lot to further improve the relationship (economic and otherwise) between the U.S. and Vietnam.

Finally, there's Kogelo, Kenya, the place in the world that thus far has benefited most from Obama's election. The Wall Street Journal reported that the Kenyan government showed up in Kogelo -- Obama's father's hometown -- shortly after the news of Obama's election to hook the village into the country's power grid, and perhaps even pave the roads. Officals, according to The Journal, said the work was "previously planned," but we have our suspicions that in frontier markets like Kenya, there are no coincidences.

Our bold prediction for the future
Obama has been elected president at a fascinating time for the world. While it's clear that the U.S. remains the world's economic leader, globalization and global development are continuing rapidly. We believe economic growth abroad will continue to outpace growth here at home, and our position at the center of the economic universe will diminish more and more over time, giving way to China, India, and the many other emerging markets.

Obama's job, should he choose to accept it, is to make sure that the U.S. maintains and strengthens relationships with the emerging markets, such as India, Vietnam, and Brazil, that want the U.S. as a trading partner, a source for expertise, and a friend. In short, we hope that Obama does not embrace protectionism.

As President-elect Obama works to develop an appropriate foreign policy for our country's changing position in the world, we encourage all investors to develop foreign policies for their investment portfolios as well. That means getting invested abroad -- and doing so today.

Take a look at our top global stock picks by joining our Motley Fool Global Gains international investing service free for 30 days.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Tim and Nate are Global Gains analysts. Neither owns shares of any company mentioned. Satyam and Amazon.com are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Dell is an Inside Value pick. Yes, we can tell you about the Fool's disclosure policy. And yes, we just did.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 07, 2008, at 3:06 PM, WeNeedJobs wrote:

    I think Globalization is over-hyped. It is over-hyped by corporations to save cost and leverage tax loopholes that provided incentives to corporations that offshore jobs and so called "offshore tax strategy" and foreign individuals that are here in the US that wanted their homeland to do better at the expense of US losing jobs or our screwed up economy, so what?

    Lets look at a few things more closely:

    1. Current economy: Did you think we got to where we are overnight? NO! This was a storm long in the brewing process, dated back to the Internet Bubble days. Everything was forward looking and heavily speculated, with little or no fundamentals to support the growth and some of the business models at the time. Thus the Bubble-bursted in 2000. Since then, the job market recovered a little, and people were still heavily leveraging their mortgage for investments, and other purchases, taking out unrealistic loans that their incomes and the job market can't simply support. This in combination with corporates GREED for more and more Income, while reducing cost and labor, without any concerns for loss of jobs in the overall job market. Somehow, corporations forget that people need to earn a living wage, and with additional disposable income is where the purchases of their products are made from. This goes back to giving more to the rich and taking away from the working middle-class. Thus increasing the gap fo the rich and poor, and wiping out the middle class...

    2. Job Market: With the current Unemployment of 6.5% and about a Million jobs lost since the beginning of 2008, more and more companies are trying to entrenched themselves for the long haul. This is so easily done at the expense of laying off more workers. Everyday, we hear of this company is laying off 3000, another company is laying off 7000 and so on. Where do you think these people going to find employment if all companies are doing the same? This in turn has a further spiral effect on the macro economy in terms of purchasing power, sales of manufacturing goods, foreclosed homes, financial crisis, etc... It is time for Corporations to come up with new strategies, to have some ethical and social responsibilities, not simply just GREED. We got here today due to GREED, GREED, and more GREED.

    We need to overhaul the entire free-market system, and to rid of all the loopholes that would prevent GREEDY investors driving up stock prices on speculations and then short-selling it. This is wrong! When the greedy investors make money, someone else is losing money. Unfortunately, it is not the corporations, but it is the people on main streets, who invested their hard earned dollars via their retirement portfolio. Also, we should not be using tax dollars to bail out GREEDY investment firms.

    3. Shortage of Labors? !NOT!: We need to fix a loophole in the H1-B visa program. H1-B was created due to shortages of labor during the Internet Boom. Well, we no longer have that boom. Currently with Unemployment at 6.5% and corporations announcing layoffs every day, we are hunger to retain high-skill jobs for US Citizens. Many companies feeling sorry for the foreign workers to sent them home, at the expense of US citizens losing our jobs. It is time to revise the INS law to put a plug into this loophole. When the job market is low, there are quite a few high skill workers available that are US citizens. We as US Citizens should be given the priviledge to take that job over a H1=B invididual, it is only fair, since we've been paying Tax for our entire life here... Please amend the H1-B visa law to make it mandatory for corporations in time of lay off, show proof that the local citizens that are qualified for the jobs are giving first priority over the H1-B. If we want local economy to grow, we need to take care of jobs for the local people. Most of all H1-B visa holders will not invest a dime in local economy, unless it is the necessity goods. Why? All that income will go overseas, just like how we are giving away money in the Iraq war and to Oil nations oversea.

    WE NEED JOBS! A little protectionism is not a bad thing. In fact, it is the smart thing. You don't see other nations giving away their jobs and their wealth do you? Why be stupid?

  • Report this Comment On November 07, 2008, at 3:20 PM, WeNeedJobs wrote:

    Addtionally, the following will help the local economy a great deal:

    1. We need tax breaks for big Corporations. We should make it a flat rate of 10% across the board to encourage corporations to stay right here in the US.

    2. Give tax incentives to corporations who previously moved their jobs offshore to bring them back here.

    3. We need to protect hard working people from losing their homes.

    4. We need to do all that we need to put in a fix for all the loopholes in H1-B and other visa programs. If we don't', there are others that spend all their awaking moments to explore the loopholes and take advantage of our system.

    5. Get rid of "Offshore Tax Incentives" for corporation, this is never understood by majority of working class USA.

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2008, at 8:09 PM, TimothyVR wrote:

    I am concerned about Obama's plans for trade. Protectionism is implict in his view - and the results for the world are always disastrous.

    I hope that good sense and pragmatism prevail.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2008, at 12:42 AM, Benkgee wrote:

    There is so much the US can do for itself and for others. The US has the ability and the resourses. The US must not expect any one else to do anything because the US can do all things equally as well or better. Can the US learn from others? Yes it can. But no body can do a better job for you than yourself.

  • Report this Comment On November 20, 2008, at 12:05 PM, PETECANUCK wrote:

    Greetings from the Great White North

    I thought gobalization was a way to trade items we make with nations that can't make these goods. Business has used this as a tool to get goods more cheaply and make larger profits. The governments we voted for have pushed this free trade on us.

    The globalization trend has put our manufacturing sector and jobs into a downdraft in Canada also.

    We are exporting our natural resources to other countries but we are not selling them our maufactured goods.

    Everything we buy here seems to be made in China also.

    The main reason for this in my opinion seems to be the currency differential between developed countries and developing nations.

    The playing field must be levelled currency wise, then we will see who is the better competitor.

    For example a Chinese yuan is only worth about 1/7 of a Canadian Dollar. Chinese workers don't make 7 times as many Yuan per hour as a Canadian worker.

    The manufacturing industry in North America is not dieing because of labour unions. People who work at profitable businesses should be paid well. Labour is only one component in the process of making something. By the way I work in a non-unionized company.

    Who is controlling the exchange rates?

    Now you have your culprit.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 771873, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 6:31:05 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
RTP $193.33 Up +2.76 +1.45%
Rio Tinto plc (ADR… CAPS Rating: *****
INFY $47.79 Down -0.50 -1.04%
Infosys Technologi… CAPS Rating: ****
RIO $17.42 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Vale CAPS Rating: *****
DELL $14.86 Down -0.05 -0.34%
Dell, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
CSCO $23.82 Down -0.11 -0.46%
Cisco Systems, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****
AMZN $126.20 Up +5.59 +4.63%
Amazon.com, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
SAY $5.24 Down -0.06 -1.13%
Mahindra Satyam CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Buying in thirds: Buying in thirds is a time-honored Motley Fool practice, teaching investors to enter an eventual "full" stockholding in three separate lots. This is typically advisable for those who are new to investing, those who like a stock long-term but worry about its present valuation being high, and those who like to dollar-cost average.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!