Recs

40

The Buying Opportunity You Won't Want to Miss

It didn't happen exactly as I had predicted, but it has finally happened. And it means that the world's fastest-growing stocks are available for cheap.

Before I get to the whos, whys, and wheres, though, let me tell you whom we have to thank.

Here comes the cabal
Although owners of heavily shorted stocks such as Sirius XM (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) , Motorola (NYSE: MOT  ) , and Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD  ) may disagree with me, short-sellers are crucial to healthy markets.

By making the case for stocks to fall, short-sellers make the market more efficient. Shorts temper excessive optimism, helping us all avoid the protracted painful corrections that are its consequence.

Where shorts didn't tread
Optimism, however, had been the defining characteristic of Chinese markets until 2008. Chinese stocks gained 130% in 2006, and another 97% in 2007. As a result, money moved into these markets at a remarkable clip, and stories abounded about Chinese housewives, cab drivers, and fishmongers speculating in the market.

Of course, there was nothing to stop them.

See, you couldn't short stocks in China. Without investors scouring the market for weaknesses, those same housewives, cab drivers, and fishmongers have been treated to nothing but good news. That made them overconfident, overzealous, and then overexposed to an unquestionably richly valued basket of stocks.

It won't be that way for long ...
China's Security Regulatory Commission -- fearing a stock market crash -- was reluctant to stop them. That's why the country held off for so long on allowing investors to short stocks.

But it had become so bad in China last year that the CSRC finally approved shorting at the end of September. To me, this indicates that the CSRC believed all optimism had been purged from the marketplace. When that happens, we've reached the point of maximum pessimism -- the precise time that master international investor Sir John Templeton would have told you to invest.

And you should consider that. Because though Chinese stocks have rebounded from their lows, many are still available for lower multiples than we had seen previously. For example, fast-growing companies such as newly listed Yongye International (Nasdaq: YONG  ) and China Marine Food (AMEX: CMFO  ) -- both Motley Fool Global Gains recommendations -- are selling for less than 10 times earnings.

Get ready to buy
That's why you should be licking your chops.

China's rapid economic growth will be the global economic story of the next 10 to 20 years. The opportunities are huge, and the country is growing richer by the day. In fact, our Motley Fool Global Gains international investing team recently returned from a research trip to China, where we met with executives at Yongye, China Marine, and more and were generally impressed with how these folks ran their companies.

That does not mean, however, that we'd be willing to pay any price to own them. Today, however, thanks to the decline in the Chinese market, we're looking hard at a long list of Chinese stocks. To see what we're recommending, click here to try Global Gains free for 30 days. There is no obligation to subscribe.

Already subscribe to Global Gains? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was first published on Aug. 20, 2007. It has been updated.

Tim Hanson is co-advisor of Global Gains. He owns shares of Yongye and China Marine. Both are Global Gains picks. The Fool's disclosure policy enjoys Mongolian throat singing.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    "Although owners of heavily shorted stocks such as Sirius XM (Nasdaq: SIRI), Motorola (NYSE: MOT), and Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD) may disagree with me, short-sellers are crucial to healthy markets.

    By making the case for stocks to fall, short-sellers make the market more efficient. Shorts temper excessive optimism, helping us all avoid the protracted painful corrections that are its consequence".

    This is the most ignorant and stupid comment Ive ever read in my life. The capitalistic concept wouldnt understand or comprehend selling something you dont have. Could you imagine selling real estate you didnt own in 2005, and then rebuying in 2009? What would that exactly look like? Define efficient? If you mean volitle, stocks from day to day should never move as they do. Thats criminal, especially with the huge ups and downs from day to day. Sometimes of nothing. Thats not efficiency moron, thats called a game. Please remove yourself from being a journalist. Its comments like that that make this country weaker, and more dumb. I cant believe you would actually think people are stupid enough to buy that arguement. Sad for you to even think that, you obviously have no respect for the American taxpayer.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    Excessive optimism? LOL

    LOL

    LOL

    LOL

    What the hell are you talking about? Supply and demand/supply and demand. Legal, actual supply and demand is all you need to fairly price stocks. You are not very aware of how a real capitalistic concept works do you? I can explain it to you in you want to email me. Well go over some Adam Smith for you.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 10:15 AM, trammen0 wrote:

    man ANOTHER FOOLISH article that shows the intelligence of this organization...

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Fool wrote:

    Hey Tim, are you convincing people to short SIRI so its share price can drop to pennies and then you can write more NEGATIVE articles?

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 12:21 PM, TEBuddy wrote:

    I would like someone explain how the act of shorting makes the market more efficient. Why can someone not just be pecimistic without profitting from it? Why can actual earnings, margins, and value be the basis of stock price? How does this gambling game make it more efficient, when it can be used to manipulate when overly pecimistic and people can actually sabotage companies to make them do bad. It anti-productive to me.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 1:14 PM, j18a21g wrote:

    When The Motley Fool crew first started out they had such a promising future. Sad to see what they have become.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 2:01 PM, blearynet wrote:

    Sad. MF used to be a site that I read for actual information. Now it is just non-stop advertisements for the newsletters, masquerading as "articles."

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 3:21 PM, williamjacobs wrote:

    I sort of must agree with the sentiment here.

    Short squeezes send stock prices higher than they normally would go right before a correction as momentum players buy in to the short sellers and demand dries up as everyone inclined to buy does so and those tempted will want no part of the inflated price.

    Crash.

    Similarly, as the shorts sell out their shares on teh way down to take profits, this induces panic in the those holding long positions. Higher highs, lower lows in a shorter period of time.

    Market efficiency used to be the term we used to describe the market's tendency to set the price at its true value. This is the opposite. It is induced volatility.

    The one plausible argument made was the wish for those who have bought short to let the cat out of the bag about bad news the company wants to hide. This saves would-be buyers a fair amount of money, but as the price drops due to the bad news, current holders are NOT happy with their loss of equity. It's rather a wash.

    Shorting good for the system? Probably not. The value of shorting could probably be provided with some other mechanism, (say, effective SEC regulation? If that's possible.), but that went out of style sometime in the past 8 years.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 9:55 PM, wrldtrvlr wrote:

    There's some very good information in this article.

    Nice write-up, Tim, and I agree with your two main points.

    I also own shares of YONG and CMFO and agree that they're still quite cheap, though not as cheap as earlier this year.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2009, at 10:56 PM, MikeRules wrote:

    I'm not going to bash Tim Hanson (if that's his real name...lol) on this article. It makes sense. I just want to know why in God's name SIRI seems to be mentioned in a ton of articles on this site that have nothing to do with it. What in the blue hell is going on here? I visit Y! Finance and say to myself, "A new SIRI article, let me read it." Then I get this.

    Bottom Line: Speaking of China, the I-Phone is going to China. Sirius XM is on the I-Phone. I'm no math expert but this adds up pretty good in my eyes. Plus if you want a real number the 1 year target estimate has just been raised to $.73, which is probably irrelevant since it's going to $1 by year's end.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 3:00 AM, greenwave3 wrote:

    Congrats... you figured out why they put SIRI in every article. There are lots of people trading SIRI and those lures bring in unsuspecting would-be-SIRI-article-seeking folks.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 8:31 AM, spr0949 wrote:

    This arguement is just a way to excuse improper conduct. Short selling should be illegal. Just try to tell the bank you want to borrow money against property you don't own yet, but will own when the price goes down! (That's assuming the bank is actually making loans and not just hoarding or paying bonuses with the stimulus money.) Short sellers hurt everyone else and I am elated every time I hear of a short seller getting burned by stock prices going up. Also, an article that only refers to Sirius as an example of anything is not an article about Sirius. I liken this to two women gossiping over the fence.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 8:56 AM, spr0949 wrote:

    Additionally, Sirius is expected to post positive earnings for the current quarter, for the first time. I anticipate that will move the stock to $1 in October with the stock hitting $3 by years end. If the Feds invoke the "fairness doctrine" for terrestrial radio then the sky's the limit for this stock. As part of their merger concessions they added several channels for more liberal points of view, thus already being in compliance with that policy.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 9:53 AM, ST0CKTRADER wrote:

    Wow....another negative mention of siri all the while trying to convince readers why shorting is okay...It would seem quite obvious that motley fool is shorting siri stock as there is no other logical explanation for the daily attacks...they are getting quite desperate.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 3:17 PM, spr0949 wrote:

    Hey Mr. Tim Hanson, how about some full disclosure. What is your position on SIRI?

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 4:29 PM, greenwave3 wrote:

    I'm pretty sure all you author-bashers completely missed the boat on this article. Tim's point is not that everyone should engage in short selling, but simply that short sellers can be an effective check against otherwise unfretted market optimism. If you recall, there was quite a bit of optimism in U.S. markets before they crumbled last year. The DJIA peaked out over 14,000 less than a year before the market crashed.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 4:37 PM, JWILLI44 wrote:

    lol......Writers put SIRI in the article just to get more clicks. SIRI is heavily traded and people read articles relating to it. This article doesnt have anything to do with SIRIUS XM, besides the beginning reference as an example. SIRI investers are becoming "cult" like. Any thing said about it that is not positive is attacked as some conspiracy to kill the stock... I am long SIRIUS, but I don't think I'm fanatic as others who berate anyone that says anything but how great the stock is, and how it should be over $1.00. Shorting stock is part of the business. Shorting is just as risky as being long and holding. Investing involves risk either way. Sooner or later good companies will rise above the shorts..As SIRI has been doing, its up more than 100% in the last 6 months..

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 4:43 PM, spr0949 wrote:

    Why do you think there needs to be a check against "unfettered market optimism"? Some people would wager on whether or not a frog makes it across the road without getting run over. These are the short sellers. Market optimism is checked by those who have a more pessimistic view. We don't need people selling stock they don't own to do that.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2009, at 5:04 PM, spr0949 wrote:

    JWILLI44, I am not particularly concerned with the positive and negative thoughts expressed regarding Sirius/XM. I do however believe that short selling creates an artificial market force that is generally negative, and I don't believe that optimism is ever "unfettered".

  • Report this Comment On September 08, 2009, at 5:00 PM, JRSmithman wrote:

    I love how fools can not even aggree on what they write

    here is another article just written today

    Cash for Clunkers: 100% Gainers to Sell Now

    By Shannon Zimmerman (MF)

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2009, at 2:51 PM, anonman wrote:

    WHY IS CMFO GOING DOWN?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

  • Report this Comment On September 16, 2009, at 2:58 PM, anonman wrote:

    WTH IS WRONG WITH THIS STOCK??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 978522, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 5:49:48 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
SIRI $1.93 Down -0.06 -3.02%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
YONG $2.94 Down -0.04 -1.34%
Yongye Internation… CAPS Rating: ***
MSI $48.02 Up +0.30 +0.63%
Motorola Solutions… CAPS Rating: **
AMD $6.22 Up +0.20 +3.32%
Advanced Micro Dev… CAPS Rating: **
CMFO $0.80 Up +0.01 +1.27%
China Marine Food… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement