GM Dumps Opel

Recs

4

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Welcome back to square one, GM.

You may have thought the question of who gets Opel had been put to rest months ago. (I did.) But it's actually taken weeks of hemming and hawing for General Motors to decide whether it really does want to sell Opel. Turns out it does.

As The Wall Street Journal details, pressure from the German government to get a deal done has finally persuaded GM to throw in the towel. Backed by German government loans, Magna International (NYSE: MGA) will be permitted to "buy" Opel.

Why "buy"?
Why the quotation marks? Because as "sales" go, this one is a doozy:

  • For one thing, Magna doesn't actually get all of Opel. Ten percent of the equity goes to the company's labor union, while GM will hang onto a 35% stake.
  • For another, the 55% that Magna does get will actually be split three ways among the Canadian automaker, and Russia's GAZ Group and Sberbank.
  • Third and most curious of all, Magna won't pay a dime for Opel. GM's giving it away for free. (Siemens (NYSE: SI) shareholders will recognize the feeling of deja vu, and Motorola (NYSE: MOT) investors can also sympathize.)

Why so magnanimous, GM?
Besides bending to pressure from the German government and unions, GM gets to be quit of money-losing Opel -- but not without strings attached. The most stringent of which is Magna's agreement not to market Opels in the U.S. or Korea, to avoid the Chinese market until 2015, and endure self-imposed exile from Canada until 2012. GM will also still get to use Opel's engineering facility for its own product development.

So is this a good deal or what?
It may seem impolite to go searching for cavities in GM's gift horse, but the strings do invite untangling. From my perspective, this deal is good for Magna (if not as good as I'd like). Sure, it would be nice to have access to the world's two largest car markets. But given its lack of name-recognition locally, I doubt Opel would be a big seller stateside, at least.

In contrast, Opel boasts 9.3% market share in Europe. As for other markets ... well, maybe the less Magna competes with its car-parts customers Toyota (NYSE: TM), Tata (NYSE: TTM), Ford (NYSE: F), and Honda (NYSE: HMC) in selling cars, the better. If limiting its competitive efforts while it learns to run a car company allays their concerns, so much the better.

And once they're well lulled into complacency ... then Magna can take the world by storm.

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

By the way, we also have a very active discussion board on the subject of Buying and Maintaining a Car. Feel free to post your thoughts on this column there, or in the comments section below. We're listening.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 11, 2009, at 9:12 PM, flyingdals wrote:

    Let's get this straight - this is the same Magna that you wrote an article on several months ago arguing that Magna was doomed and was go down the tubes, mmm. What changed?

  • Report this Comment On September 12, 2009, at 12:16 PM, TMFDitty wrote:

    I wrote several articles on Magna "several months ago." None of which expressed the sentiment which you ascribe to them.

    One argued that China appeared to be outbidding Magna for Opel. Another suggested that Magna was making a mistake in attracting Russian partners; that it should (and could) buy Opel outright on its own.

    So "what changed" is that the China bid appears to have fallen by the wayside. What has not changed is that I still believe Magna would be better off doing this alone. But it isn't.

    --TMFDitty

  • Report this Comment On September 12, 2009, at 12:34 PM, NOTvuffett wrote:

    Let me see if I have this straight- Opel was a profitable division so that is the one they want to sell?

    I would be curious as to the results of a survey of people that EVER want to buy another GM car. Taxpayers got screwed, shareholders got screwed, bondholders got screwed.

  • Report this Comment On September 13, 2009, at 10:40 AM, TMFDitty wrote:

    I thought the same thing myself initially, NOTvuffett. Opel has a stellar reputation in Russia (the only European country in which I've spent significant time), and I had always assumed the company was profitable for this reason. It's not.

    According to data from Capital IQ, Opel lost $362 million in fiscal 2007 (the most recent year for which such granular data is available.) More recently, GM Europe reported $2.9 billion in losses in 2008. So in fact, Opel is *not* profitable. The only GM division reporting consistent profits, year-in and year-out, is GM Latin America.

    Fool on!

    --TMFDitty

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2009, at 9:31 PM, RaulChapin wrote:

    Didn't Pepsi have problems with its clients when it bought Taco Bell, Pizza Hut etc?

    I agree with your point that keeping out of their clients turfs might be a better idea.

    I am not sure about why have Russian partners control 2/3rds of your investment. I do not quite believe Canadian businessmen are savy enough to be working a front.

    (Buy with Russian partners but Canadian Face, then sell your portion to the Russian partners)

    In the above scenario, you do not necessarily upset your clients who might not be looking at getting into the Russian market, and you pretty much assure yourself a large client in the Russian market...

    In any case, unless Toyota, Tata and the gang get upset, it seems like a pretty good deal for Magna. (If nothing else at least as inexpensive training in how to run a car factory!)

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 982958, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 12:08:49 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Public Health-Care Plan's Problem

Related Tickers

11/30/2009 4:00 PM
TTM $14.32 Up +0.60 +4.37%
Tata Motors Limite… CAPS Rating: *****
MGA $48.38 Down -0.58 -1.18%
Magna Internationa… CAPS Rating: ***
TM $78.54 Up +1.52 +1.97%
Toyota Motor Corp… CAPS Rating: ****
SI $98.62 Up +0.57 +0.58%
Siemens AG (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
F $8.89 Up +0.16 +1.83%
Ford Motor Company CAPS Rating: **
HMC $30.99 Down -0.05 -0.16%
Honda Motor Co., L… CAPS Rating: *****
MOT $8.01 Down -0.19 -2.32%
Motorola, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Micro cap: A micro cap is a company with a very small market capitalization, generally between $50 million and $250 million.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!