How I Timed the Market

Recs

69

Keep good records in case you get sued or audited -- or if you just hope to learn from past experiences. It’s for that last reason (and, frankly, the second ... curse you, IRS!) that I keep meticulous records of my investments.

And so I found myself looking back over my recent transaction history. I wanted to see what I had done since October 2007 -- the beginning of what became a historic market downturn -- and what that behavior revealed about my state of mind during that tumultuous time ... and what we can learn from it.

So let’s take a trip back in time ...

October 2007 to May 2008
This was, for lack of a better term, the beginning of the end, but it was a fairly benign beginning. While the market was down 20% over this 8-month period, it was business as usual in my portfolio, with two or three buys per month into companies such as 3M (NYSE: MMM) and Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) that I not only thought were compelling values, but also believed had the financial strength to survive a coming downturn.

And while I thought at the time that I was a rational master of my emotions, it’s more likely I was just getting duped by my amygdala. As Jason Zweig writes in Your Money and Your Brain, “Because the amygdala [the reflexive part of your brain] is so attuned to big changes, a sudden drop in the market tends to be more upsetting than a longer, slower decline.”

Either way, I'd say I handled the slow decline from October 2007 to May 2008 fairly well.

June 2008 to July 2008
Fast-forward two months, however, and the market began to test my mettle. I followed up a sharp near-10% decline in the market with a flurry of activity. But rather than sell in fear, I went aggressively long -- making 13 purchases of volatile international stocks such as Philip Morris (NYSE: PM) and China Fire & Security (Nasdaq: CFSG) that I believed had been unfairly oversold. Although it looked savvy at first as the market briefly perked up in August, this was a mistake.

It was not a mistake of fear, however, but rather one of greed. And while Zweig suggests that investors tend to get caught up in upward momentum, sending more and more money into the market as stock prices rise, I, as a conditioned value investor,  got greedy just as prices dropped sharply -- and ignored the data suggesting it could well get worse.

It did.

August 2008 to January 2009
The market declined 35%, creating what may end up being one of history’s great buying opportunities, and yet I couldn’t make more than a few buys here and there because I had used up my excess powder prematurely in July.

Thus, rather than being in a position to take advantage of this mega-drop, I was fully invested amid historic downside volatility. This led to some sleepless nights and some tough decisions in early February.

February 2009
If investing success is buying low and selling high, then failure is the opposite. And yet there I was in early February unloading stocks such as Whole Foods (Nasdaq: WFMI) and Sotheby’s (NYSE: BID) at 50% discounts to where I’d bought them.

Why? First, I was in too deep. My episode of greed in July had caused me to invest more money in stocks that I felt comfortable with. Thus, as the market continued to drop, I was unable to stay unemotional.

Second, I fell victim to recency bias. As Zweig writes, "The more recently [an event] occurred . . . the more probable its recurrence will seem." Put those two facts together and you can understand why my brain was pushing me to take some money out of the stock market.

Fortunately, I wasn’t totally shell-shocked. I only moved out a little -- enough to restore an analytical mindset. Further, rather than keep those sums 100% in cash, I put some in high-yield bonds, which were also distressed and which have not wholly missed out on the recent rebound (though they have not done as well as equities).

At the end of the day, these were defensive moves made out of fear, moves that depressed my returns. And while it frustrates me that I fell into one of investing’s psychological traps, I did end up realizing a benefit.

March 2009 to present
With investor equilibrium restored, it was back to business as usual in my portfolio with two or three purchases per month. And just as the market began to turn in March, I purchased shares of a speculative -- but, I believed, highly undervalued -- Chinese company called Yongye International (Nasdaq: YONG).

At the time it traded over-the-counter and did not yet have a CFO or any independent directors on its board. The stock, however, was dirt cheap at $1.70 per share.

Now, if I hadn’t rebalanced my portfolio in February, I don’t think I would have had the gumption to purchase this stock. But I was back in my comfort zone, and I was able to pull the trigger.

I’m glad I did. Yongye has since added a number of qualified individuals to its management team and listed on the Nasdaq. Further, our Global Gains team visited Yongye in China in June to get a better handle on the business -- after which we called it out as a top pick to our Global Gains members.

Yongye now trades for more than $8 per share. I don’t write this to gloat or cherry-pick, but rather to highlight the importance of having -- at all times -- a balanced portfolio that allows you to make decisions untainted by emotion.

The takeaways
That’s my story, but there are three key takeaways for you as well. Here they are:

1. Never go all in.
I acted too soon in July, and that reduced my flexibility, as well as my ability to remain unemotional going forward.

2. Add money to the market on a regular basis.
Despite all of the research I’d read and all of the contacts I have, I was unable to anticipate the market’s near-term moves. I would have saved myself a lot of stress if I had stuck to regular buys of great companies at great prices.

3. Diversification matters.
Whether it’s stocks or bonds, domestic or foreign stocks, or small caps or large caps, the defense that diversification provides truly does provide peace of mind in times of crisis. Not only does it help you lose less money as the market’s falling, but it can also allow you to stay unemotional and analytical -- enabling you to take advantage of incredible opportunities such as Yongye whenever they present themselves.

We employ all of these lessons at Motley Fool Global Gains, where our team of analysts seeks to find value in the world’s very volatile emerging markets. And while 2009 has been a particularly volatile year for us, stocks like Yongye more than make up for it. To take a look at all of our research and recommendations, simply click here to join Global Gains free this month.

Already subscribe to Global Gains? Log in at the top of this page.

Tim Hanson is co-advisor of Motley Fool Global Gains. He owns shares of Yongye International, 3M, and Philip Morris. Sotheby’s is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems selection. Philip Morris is a Global Gains recommendation. Starbucks and 3M are Inside Value picks. Whole Foods and Starbucks are Stock Advisor picks. The Motley Fool owns shares of Starbucks and has this disclosure policy to make sure all of our analysts keep meticulous records.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 4:27 PM, erniewerner wrote:

    Nice article, but I have a problem with its retrospective look and the finding of Zweig quotes to fit your perspective at different points along the way. I get the feeling that if things had turned out differently, ie no crash in Oct 2008, you would be writing an article replete with supportive quotes about how you had done the correct thing by being fully invested in August. With 20/20 hindsight, it is easy to identify the mistakes and correct moves, but the challenge is knowing what to do going forward, not handicapping what we already know to be true. BTW, nice find on YONG.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 4:51 PM, raj2009yahoo wrote:

    Is ETLY.OB any good? Stock went up 40% to .22 and a volume of 19 million. Fed is putting in $100 million for projects related to this company. Would like to hear the fool's story behind this company.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 5:17 PM, knighttof3 wrote:

    One crucial detail missing - how did your portfolio fare in absolute percentage loss/gain from Oct 2007 to May 2008 to Aug 2008 to now?

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 9:15 PM, MIAfool100 wrote:

    Is YONG still a good investment, or has it achieved most of it's expected gain?

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 10:26 PM, gds1234 wrote:

    I enjoyed reading your thoughts and conclusions. Since GG doesn't seem to ever present $1.70 stocks like Yong, I have no way to follow such a company at its earliest stages. Is it against MF and GG philosophy to occasionally present such companies for readers with a few dollars they want to use speculatively?

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 11:59 PM, thisislabor wrote:

    why do you keep trying to control your emotion, instead of working with it? wouldn't it be better in the long run (and easier) to stop saying these things made you do this or this caused you to fail, and instead see the decisions you make as one you should or should not do? at least when you are doing what you should, be the decision right or wrong, you are functiong as an adult and in control of your emotions... these same ones your fighting constantly. and when you free your mind up from that you can go back to analyzing for better opportunities?

    or am I just completely off base here?

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 2:01 AM, AurionPendragon wrote:

    YONG is indeed still a good investment.

    Still relatively undiscovered, and is highly expected to move up above CGA prices.

    Technical Charting has this stock at 100% buy rating as of 25 September, and when more institutions get wind of this, it will indeed boost it from the current price to somewhere close to 15-18 dollars, especially after the 3rd Quarter earnings in November.

    Of course do your own DD, again Chinese Agricultural as a whole will continue to rise for the next 2-3 years.. so basically all the current prices seem like the "bottom". Just my two cents good luck to everyone.

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 4:07 AM, thisislabor wrote:

    I would love to comment on this company but I don't know//haven't read enough financial statements of companies this small to have any understanding of them.

    alot of things in the financial statements scream either red flags to me or that they are legitmately growing business - I just dont have enough experience to judge left or right. interesting read through their financial statments though.

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 4:18 AM, thisislabor wrote:

    however I can say that they have a rediculous amount of net income relative to sales. and it's growing, so is inventory sizes and receivables//payables.

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 6:42 AM, tyyuy wrote:

    so, you think this is over?

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 7:44 AM, pianofritz50 wrote:

    If one does not constantly focus on a daily or weekly basis, the stock market can "chew you up". And even if you do, the article shows the results, in a bubble bursting.

    Lucky find on the China stock. What about the others you "chose"?

    I think the average person would do much better utilizing some type of buy & sell signal, using indexes & being diversified. The 200 day moving average is a way of doing that, if one can resist the ever present emotions, avoiding most of the large downswings, and catching most of the upswings.

    See ETFTrends. At least until "too many people are doing it"... when of course that will create it's own "bubble" effect.

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Chinastocks55 wrote:

    Market timing?

    You will never have a better chance to time a hot stock sector than the lithium battery sector this upcoming week.

    AONE ipo is bringing big attention to this red hot area of investing. AONE ipo buyers got taken however.

    The real money is in money making gems like China Sun Group (CSGH.OB) and New Energy Systems Group (CMTP.OB)

    Both of those companies are profitable, growing in a big way and have tons of cash on hand. Debt free as well.............unlike AONE.

    CSGH.OB and CMTP.OB both have major news pending in the China lithium battery space.

    Do some serious DD on both before Monday and be rewarded.

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 9:49 AM, DoWeUnderstand wrote:

    Tim:

    Where were you in March of this year? The Fool missed the bottom of the market big time. If I had listened to the comments here I would not now have Citigroup with a 48% increase, Dawson Geographical with a 65% increase and GE at 47% increase.

    You article in interesting from a retrospective position but the Fool missed the bottom and call some of the stocks where I have great growth as dead.

    Let's see you do more forward thinking articles. Anyone can look backward but not many folks seem to look forward and call the market close to what happened.

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 6:20 PM, xjp83x wrote:

    One of the better articles at Fool's.

    Timing matters a lot during the downfall.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2009, at 10:51 PM, domambaman wrote:

    We can dispute the humor of incorporating Marty Zwieg

    into his emotional journey, but he leaves the ever-dangerous impression that he has "arrived" in

    the investment world, like the proverbial knight ensconced in white, glistening armor, when he bought

    YONG. Excellent pick, but any stock--particularly a Chinese biotech stock-- can go bust. We need to be

    very, very CAREFUl regarding complacency and realize

    we have NEVER, EVER arrived as investors. Stay hungry and desperate.

    Unless the stock is a vertable blue chip, like say

    Apple ( a little bit extended here), look to ETF's for

    instant diversification ands specialization.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2009, at 10:52 PM, domambaman wrote:

    We can dispute the humor of incorporating Marty Zwieg

    into his emotional journey, but he leaves the ever-dangerous impression that he has "arrived" in

    the investment world, like the proverbial knight ensconced in white, glistening armor, when he bought

    YONG. Excellent pick, but any stock--particularly a Chinese biotech stock-- can go bust. We need to be

    very, very CAREFUl regarding complacency and realize

    we have NEVER, EVER arrived as investors. Stay hungry and desperate.

    Unless the stock is a veritable blue chip, like say

    Apple ( a little bit extended here), look to ETF's for

    instant diversification and specialization.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 10:09 AM, sofpan wrote:

    YONG is great for long term investment.

    I don't have but I wanna have some.

    I can not buy now cause I'm overbought.

    YONG is not expensive at today's price levels ($8.20) but I can not tell if it happen any short term retreatment.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 9:08 PM, TMFMmbop wrote:

    YONG's not really a biotech stock. It makes fertilizer. Further, it has changed its name from Yongye Biotechnology to Yongye International...not sure why all of the portals haven't updated that by all.

    Thanks for all of the good comments and feedback.

    Tim Hanson

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 8:57 AM, sprogy wrote:

    I don't think your july reaction was wrong, given the (un)probability of the things that happened later. I too ran out of bullets too early, but in a similar scenario I would have done it all over again. This doesn't cover the selling part later on, unfortunatelly. :)

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 4:46 PM, daustin97222 wrote:

    My story is similar but much shorter. I'm typically 60/40 stocks/bonds (exactly) in a large index fund, and when the market (SP500) dipped below 1000 with the collapse of Lehman, I moved from 60/40 to 95/5. I just looked up the date and it was 10/20/08. I felt fairly smug about it. At the time. Now, I've been investing in stocks since '74 and I've seen a few blowoffs. But then, of course, it collapsed to 666. I didn't sell or do anything emotional. I just kept up the full deferral into my retirement plans and watched the devastation through the spring (as we all did).

    -Doug

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 5:20 PM, salvadorveiga wrote:

    oh my oh my... when will some people learn to not fight the trend? you sure do like to catch falling knives...

    I was a MDP'er and while I saw them having a 58% drawdown, my returns were up 3 digits by using their portfolio stocks in my position trades... why fight the trend?

    www.mybullmarket.org there you have my journey since December 2008 and the more recent entries...

    Riding the bear market down from 1460 point down to 730, and been riding the trend up from 750 until 1040.

    Again, why fight the trend??

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Benrik wrote:

    I have always heard and believed, "Never time the market." Still, I reacted to what I perceived to be a market boiling with insane greed in July of '07. Mind you, these are all 401 funds. I did not want to still be working at 80, so when I had lost 18% of my total and my stomach fell harder, faster and further than the market I dumped everthing into a T-Bill fund. But I kept buying regularly. 7 or 8 months ago I felt some sanity had returned,i.e, I didn't feel nauseus, so I transferred funds back into the various indexed funds available to me. To date, my PIP has greatly exceeded anything my 401 can offer on its own and I am 7% over what the highest point was in early '07. I am too scared to be smug and it still feels like timing to me. I still have a few years to go, what a ride! So, if my health outlives my funds, life could be smiles, if not, well, that's another issue.

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 6:22 PM, retiredoldtimer wrote:

    maybe this thoughtful article is just a confirmation of the ancient adage "you can't time the market." ??

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 7:38 PM, salvadorveiga wrote:

    you probably can't time the market but if you trade in favor of the trend you will amount huge piles of money...

    check www.mybullmarket.org

    and see some graphs of S&P there, Dow Jones as well as some stocks

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 7:50 PM, AdirondackFund wrote:

    Or, Sal, you show up GV's Lounge the moment the S&P hits 1080, the moment after the FED has spewed perfume all over the dead carcass, and nobody will let you in.

    Anybody want to live in Detroit right now? That would be both contrarian and bullish, but most likely a stupid idea to begin with.

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 11:04 PM, salvadorveiga wrote:

    Adirondack, I'm sorry I didn't understand... can you be more clear?

    What did you try to imply? Thanks

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2009, at 11:26 PM, john795806 wrote:

    Yesterday, my stock investments hit the same level they were at when the Dow hit an all-time high (when it was at over 14,000). And, I haven't added anything to my portfolio, which is all in funds. So, I'm pretty pleased with myself. Forgive my gushing. But please, read on.

    Frankly, I've never seen an easier market to time, because the writing was on the wall before the s*** hit the fan. I was all in on stocks at the market high. When the market had taken a 10% haircut, the full impact of the credit crisis was not yet apparent. Still, I decided to cut back about 20% because I wanted to have some cash around, just in case. By the time the Dow was around 11,000, I was ALL in cash--because it was clear what had happened: Americans had borrowed more than they could pay for (housing, mainly, but also huge credit card debt), and the bill was due. That meant we would be buying less, hence manufacturing less, hence losing jobs, hence diving stocks.

    I sat on my pile of cash until the market hit 6800, then started getting in, in 20% bites. Here's the kicker--while my portfolio is at the same value as it was at Dow 14400 (and again, I have added no new money to it), I'm STILL almost 40% in cash. Cash is good--because bad stuff happens, at least every year or so. Having cash makes me not feel so bad about the money I might lose in a market downturn, because I can always jump in at those very low moments to take advantage. Cash is comfort. Cash keeps me from being too emotional.

    Well, in my opinion (which based on my record is worth at least a little) those heady days of pretty much seeing the market direction are over. My strategy is similar, though: Good to almost ALWAYS have some cash for a rainy day, even if it's just 20%. And roughly, the percentage cash should match your "feel" for market downside. Feeling as I do that we will be meandering for a while, I'm 40% in cash. I also have very little money in individual stocks--it takes the edge off of my emotions. ETFs and mutual funds give me peace of mind.

    Free advice--worth its price!

    Happy investing!

  • Report this Comment On October 03, 2009, at 7:48 PM, freddyv3 wrote:

    A worthy article that suggests to me that the vast, vast majority of investors, including the author, should never be in the market in the first place...and yet he plays on, thinking that the strategy he used for years and perhaps decades will work in the future.

    Welcome to 1930, my friend.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 993375, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/4/2009 3:57:35 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
How Can Investors Survive This Market?

Related Tickers

12/4/2009 3:40 PM
PM $49.81 Up +0.33 +0.67%
Philip Morris Inte… CAPS Rating: *****
WFMI $26.20 Up +0.51 +1.99%
Whole Foods Market… CAPS Rating: ***
MMM $78.09 Up +0.94 +1.22%
3M Company CAPS Rating: *****
CFSG $12.71 Down -0.09 -0.70%
China Fire & Secur… CAPS Rating: *****
YONG $8.78 Down -0.09 -1.01%
Yongye Biotechnolo… CAPS Rating: ****
SBUX $21.58 Up +0.46 +2.18%
Starbucks Corp CAPS Rating: **
BID $20.28 Up +0.51 +2.58%
Sotheby's CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Form 4: The Form 4 is the SEC form company insiders must submit detailing transactions they conduct involving that company. The Form 4 can be found on the SEC's http://idea.sec.gov/idea/searchidea/companysearch_idea.html IDEA database.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!