Rising Star Buy: Nam Tai Electronics

This article is part of our Rising Star Portfolios series.

Investment ideas come from many places: watchlists, newsletter recommendations, even discussion boards. Today's idea comes from the latter. Fellow Fool nonzerosum suggested some three weeks ago that my Messed-Up Expectations (MUE) portfolio invest in Nam Tai Electronics (NYSE: NTE  ) , writing, "[I]t appears to be rebounding (look at Q2 and especially Q3 2010), and as revenues increase almost all the gain will drop to the bottom line."

After digging further into the company, I agree.

Why it's appealing
If you like gadgets, then you probably like Nam Tai, or at least have used its products. It's a Chinese maker of components used in putting together cell phones, notebook computers, digital cameras, and other electronic gadgets. While it doesn't sell directly to consumers, it is affected by the success of those that do.

As you might imagine, it was hit pretty hard by the last recession, with revenue dropping 20% and 34% in 2008 and 2009, respectively, while net income fell 56% and 95% for those two years. Even in the depth of the recession, however, it managed to eke out a profit, something that its two major competitors, Jabil Circuit (NYSE: JBL  ) and Flextronics International (Nasdaq: FLEX  ) , can't say. Granted, their losses came from restructuring charges and a whopping $6 billion writedown of goodwill for Flextronics and a $1 billion goodwill writedown for Jabil, but then Nam Tai hadn't done the kind of merger that leads to such writedowns.

Instead, management at Nam Tai has been paying off debt -- it currently has none -- and cutting costs. That's paid off handsomely in 2010 as the company grew revenue and net income again in each of the last three quarters, ending the year up handsomely over 2009.

Management expects to see 2010's growth continue through this year, at least. Add in a new manufacturing plant in Wuxi, China, that should turn profitable by the end of the year, and the company is looking at even better profitability in 2012.

What could hurt
The biggest concern is a significant slowdown of the world economic recovery, which could be exacerbated by oil remaining at its currently high level for an extended period of time. The latest issue of The Economist suggests that a 10% increase in the price of oil cuts a quarter of a percentage point off global growth. The editors say that the world's economy is currently growing at about 4.5%, so a sustained move to above $150 per barrel would put a serious crimp in the recovery.

However, even during the depths of the last recession, Nam Tai managed to stay profitable, smartly building cash, reducing debt, and cutting costs. If another recession occurs, the company is still in a strong financial position to weather it.

Another significant concern is its location. Being in China opens several potential risks. For instance, management wishes to expand production capacity and start building on land in Guangming that the company has owned the use rights to since 2005. The local government has yet to release the land to the company and, until it does, nothing can be started, potentially hurting production capacity next year. However, assuming the local government lets this project move forward, that would be paid out of cash, with no need for debt.

Other risks in China include higher inflation, higher labor costs -- salaries have increased 100% over the past year -- and higher income taxes, with another 3 percentage points of increase expected in the latter over the next two years.

What I'm doing
At last night's closing price of $7.53 per share, the market is expecting 4.2% growth in free cash flow to equity (FCFE) per year for the next five years, 2.1% for the five years after that, and then no more growth at all (discounting at my 15% hurdle rate). Given the smart moves being made by management and its improving sales and profitability, I believe that's a bit of an MUE.

Only one Wall Street analyst follows the company, and his growth estimate for earnings is 12.5% over the next five years. Note, he's been behind the curve in estimating quarterly earnings for the past three quarters as sales turned around (but he is catching up). Assume the company can grow FCFE at that rate for five years, 6.2% for the following five, then reach a terminal rate of 2.5%, and shares would be priced at more than $12, some 60% higher than currently.

In short, Nam Tai is seeing improved sales and profitability, is reaping the benefits of cost cutting, and is investing in its own growth. I think the market is underestimating what is possible over the next couple of years for this company. The risk of a major pullback in the world economy is real, however, as are the problems of operating in China listed above. Therefore, I'll be purchasing about $350 worth of shares tomorrow for the MUE portfolio, a 2% position, and will likely keep it at that level until the risk of a worldwide economic slowdown recedes somewhat.

If you haven't already, add Nam Tai to My Watchlist and then join me in following this company, or any of my other purchases, over on my discussion board.

Fool analyst Jim Mueller doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. He works for the Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter service. Nam Tai Electronics is a Global Gains pick. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy is never messed up.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (9)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 10, 2011, at 5:11 AM, midaslefk wrote:

    Great article and thanks for the idea.

    Are you concerned that there are a lot of accounting "irregularities" with regards to Chinese companies (especially the small caps). For example, Nam Tai has a market cap of 330 M and according to its balance sheet 220 M of SHORT TERM assets after ALL liabilities are subtracted. These kinds of numbers get me concerned that the filings might not be so accurate.

    How do you invest with so much uncertainty, or do you know something that I don't?

  • Report this Comment On March 10, 2011, at 11:26 AM, TMFGebinr wrote:

    Hi midaslefk,

    What you're seeing there is the cash balance of about $230 million. An even bigger example of having more current assets than total liabilities is Apple. There, the difference is about $12 billion. Heck, between cash and short term investments, Apple can cover 84% of its total liabilities.

    There's always the danger of wonky accounting, and you're right that there have been many Chinese companies showing problems with that. However, the auditors seem to be pretty good names -- Deloitte and Grant Thornton for all but one year and Moore Stephens in 2009. Deloitte is a "Big 4" auditor and the other two aren't fly-by-night companies, so I'm pretty confident in the numbers. That said, even auditors can be lied to (Exhibit A: Satyam and PriceWaterhouseCoopers).

    Over the past six years, many signals come up pretty clean. I'm seeing fairly stable days sales, payables, and inventory ratios, except for 2009 when sales really dropped off. Current and quick ratios are consistently in the 2.0 to 3.0 range. These tell me that working capital is pretty well managed. Cash flow from operations has consistently outpaced net income, so the company is converting its revenue into cash, which is the point. Capex trailed off last year, but for the most part has exceeded depreciation expense, showing that the company is both keeping up with its maintenance and investing for growth, and the company has said that it's going to increase capex this year, assuming that local government releases the land so a new plant can be built.

    Of course, these could all be games played with wonky accounting, but if so, they must be masters because everything I'm looking at is telling a consistent story with no big outliers. Every investment is an expression of trust and in this case I think there's a pretty good case that the trust is warranted.

    Thanks for reading.

    Cheers,

    Jim

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1455250, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/17/2014 5:57:16 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement