The 100-Item Challenge

Recs

6

Online entrepreneur Dave Bruno has issued the world a challenge. He's daring all of us to reduce our worldly belongings to just 100 items.

That may sound crazy -- until you start digging into your closets and cupboards. How much of the stuff gathering dust in your home have you actually used lately? A less cluttered environment might actually make you feel more peaceful and productive.

Whether or not you get down to 100, paring back your belongings will likely make you feel better. It can even make you wealthier, if you sell most of your detritus and invest that money. Suppose you divest yourself of all but one of your home's TVs, sell one of your family's multiple cars, and put all your old LPs up for sale online. If you can scrape together $10,000 for your efforts, and invest that money in the stock market, it could grow to $67,000 in 20 years with a 10% annual return.

The power of a concentrated portfolio
The financial portion of your life could probably use some thinning out, too, for several reasons. For one thing, a portfolio bloated with dozens of holdings makes it harder for you to properly keep track of any of them.

I used to own lots of stocks I didn't completely understand, including Sun Microsystems (Nasdaq: JAVA), KLA-Tencor (Nasdaq: KLAC), Sonic Solutions (Nasdaq: SNIC), and Cirrus Logic (Nasdaq: CRUS). Sure, I'd been impressed by the positive things I read about them, but I couldn't tell you exactly how they made their money, nor how strong their competitive position was relative to their peers. I wasn't even keeping close tabs on their debt or inventory levels. I had too many stocks, and not enough time, financial savvy, and interest to keep track of them all.

There's also a more mathematical reason for pruning your portfolio: The fewer holdings you have, the more influence each can wield on your finances. If your money's divided equally among 50 companies, each represents about 2% of your wealth. If one stock doubles, it'll hardly be a blip in your overall holdings. But with only 10 stocks, each represents about 10% of your portfolio, and a big move in one will make a definite difference. (On the flip side, with only 10 stocks, you'd better know a lot about them -- your entire portfolio's riding on a mere handful of picks.)

Warren Buffett likes the idea of concentrated portfolios. He's talked about a lifetime punch card for investments, with only 20 slots on it. Buffett believes in carefully watching and waiting for the most attractive investing opportunities. Swinging at just a few of those fat pitches can bring you outstanding profits.

Focus your funds
Less can be more in mutual funds, too. The market offers many "focused" funds with limited lists of holdings and strong track records. Consider the FMI Large Cap (FMIHX) fund, with a market-beating five-year average annual return of more than 11%, and only about 23 stocks under its umbrella -- far fewer than the 100-200 many funds own. FMI Large Cap's top holdings recently included Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT), Accenture (NYSE: ACN), and UPS (NYSE: UPS). Managers Ted Kellner and Patrick English have said that their strategy includes cutting the number of stocks they own, and concentrating on the best ones.

Need suggestions for outstanding mutual funds? Give our Motley Fool Champion Funds newsletter a whirl. A free trial includes full access to all past issues, including detailed analysis on each pick. A hundred worldly possessions may not seem like much, but making one of them "a first-rate portfolio" can pay off in the long run.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Wal-Mart. UPS is a Motley Fool Income Investor selection. Wal-Mart and Accenture are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Try our investing newsletters free for 30 days. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 24, 2008, at 12:28 AM, thedofca100 wrote:

    I have been intrigued in the past by this 100 items thing. If I went into the house of the person who thought of this I would start in their kitchen and check out their dishes and silverware. Does 8 sets of an eight piece place setting (64 dishes) count as 1 item or 64? Does silverware for 8 places with let's say only 4 pieces per setting for a total of 32 pieces count as 1 item or 32? Look there. We're already up to 96 items just to have a small dinner party. Forget pans, cooking utensils, glassware.

    Next I would want to check out his closet and dresser. Does he have two sets of boxer shorts and wash one every day? Does he have 2 paris of slacks, 3 shirts, and two pairs of shoes and not one other piece of clothing because right there we are taking 11 items if the shoes count as 2.

    This entire idea is beyond absurd. I could join the group that doesn't buy anything new for a year without a problem, but who wants to live with only 100 items. I'd need more than that if I pitched a tent in the woods. After all the tent would count as one and the stakes would add another 10 items right there.

    This must be one interesting house to visit. You'd probably have to stand the entire time because surely there is no furniture in it.

  • Report this Comment On July 24, 2008, at 9:59 AM, ziq wrote:

    Just what I was thinking. The concept of paring down one's material possessions is good, but there has to be a better metric than number of items.

    Paring down one's stock portfolio is a whole different thing. Not analogous at all. There, looking at the number of different holdings makes sense. Whether you think the number should be 10 or 500 is debatable, but at least it's meaningful.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 690765, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/14/2009 3:58:07 PM

Keep Reading:

“The 100-Item Challenge”

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Get involved! »

Most Recent

Most Popular Articles

  1. The New Subprime7 days ago
  2. What the U.S. Needs: A New Tax System?6 days ago
  3. GM: This Stock Is Worthless3 days ago
Jul 14 at 3:57 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,355.86 +24.18 +0.29%
S&P 500 905.41 +4.36 +0.48%
NASD 1,798.90 +5.69 +0.32%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Accenture Ltd.

CAPS Rating 5/5 Stars

$33.70

+0.34 (+1.00%)

Outperform1119

Underperform45

Rate This Stock