RIP: Equities?

Recs

37

We're in the midst of a bear market, pessimism is at a peak, and investors are understandably worried.

It's no wonder the doomsayers are out in force.

Over and over, we keep hearing that "buy and hold is dead." After all, equities have been pretty much flat over the past decade, and formerly stalwart blue-chip stocks like GM (NYSE: GM), Citigroup (NYSE: C), and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) have lost more than 80% of their value since the market peak in October 2007.

When television's talking heads suggest that buy and hold is dead, I ignore them. But when a famous and well-known investor suggests that people who place their faith in stocks may be the biggest suckers of all, well, I pay attention.

Checking for a pulse
A recent Daily Finance article quoted bond investor extraordinaire Bill Gross of PIMCO fame saying, "Things will never be the same." He added: "Stocks will be more of a subordinated income vehicle as opposed to a 'stocks for the long-run' growth vehicle."

Why? Gross argues that a mix of greed, excessive borrowing, and lax regulation got the economy into this mess. Given that truth, growth prospects are so low for companies right now that common stock investors just won't benefit.

But before you go dumping all your equity holdings in favor of stuffing your money under your mattress, take a minute to think about the situation as dispassionately and objectively as you can.

Reports of its death are greatly exaggerated
While Mr. Gross is certainly correct in identifying the incredible problems investors and our economy face right now, I think it's a bit premature to declare that equity investing is dead.

First of all, consider who benefits most from statements like this. That's right -- bond gurus just like Bill Gross. Don't managers of bear-market stock funds like to hype up the potential negativity of the market during downturns? I'm certainly not accusing Gross of talking down the market so he can make a profit, but he's not exactly an uninterested observer.

But more importantly, if it's true that buying stocks is a loser's game, that would logically lead to one of two equally improbable scenarios. Either the economy will remain so bad for years on end that stock prices will remain almost permanently depressed, or companies won't be able to grow more than the barest minimum, even when economic conditions improve. Somehow, that sounds a bit pessimistically farfetched!

If we look back at history, stocks have generally averaged about an annualized 10%. That's despite the Great Depression, despite decades-long sideways markets, despite the stagflation of the 1970s, and despite the tech bust.

In the short term, Gross may well be right. But that doesn't mean anything about the long term.

Past is not prologue
Whatever the market as a whole does over the next few years, some stocks will rise and some will fall -- just like always. The market's swift and rapid plunge simply means that valuations on excellent companies with great growth prospects are more attractive today than they have been in a long time.

Markets do rebound eventually after a crash, and most of that bounce back comes in the year or two following the market bottom -- the dark days when people aren't sure whether they want to be in the market or not. If you wait until everything looks safe, you'll have already missed out on most of the rebound.

If you really want to rebuild your wealth, you need to be in the market now. That may mean picking up some big-name players in the insurance industry, such as MetLife (NYSE: MET) or Aflac (NYSE: AFL), as superstar money manager Ken Heebner has done lately. Or, perhaps like the management team over at Dodge & Cox (DODGX), you want to place a bet on health care and stock up on names like Amgen (Nasdaq: AMGN) and Sanofi-Aventis (NYSE: SNY).

Whatever your favorite sector, you should look for firms that are niche leaders in their industry, with reasonably strong product lines and a healthy financial position. Companies with strong balance sheets and reliable internal cash flows will be some of the biggest winners in the coming years, so start stocking up now.

Not dead yet
While our economy undoubtedly faces further hurdles on its path to recovery, I'm going to take a more positive stance than Bill Gross. Equities have been declared dead many times -- and so far, they've always managed to struggle back to life and go on to new highs. I'm betting they will this time, too.

Of course, it's a scary investing world out there right now. If you're feeling a bit lost about picking up the pieces and getting back in the game, carefully selected mutual funds -- ones with long-term, successful managers -- could be some of your best friends right now.

Stock investing is still a winning proposition, but a helping hand will not go unwanted in this economy. If you'd like to find the smartest investors -- and best funds -- in the business, be sure to check out the Fool's Champion Funds investment service. You can get a sneak preview of all of our fund picks with a free 30-day trial today.

Already subscribed to Champion Funds? Log in at the top of this page.

Amanda Kish heads up the Fool's Champion Funds newsletter service. At the time of publication, she did not own any of the companies mentioned herein. Aflac is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Click here to find out more about the Fool's disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 2:53 PM, bobfcfp wrote:

    good article. FYI- the cover of business week in aug 1978(i think) proclaims "the death of equities- how inflation is destroying the stock market" what have equity returns been since that time?

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 5:37 PM, titanicdwn wrote:

    "When television's talking heads suggest that buy and hold is dead, I ignore them. But when a famous and well-known investor suggests that people who place their faith in stocks may be the biggest suckers of all, well, I pay attention." You would have saved a whole hell of a lota change if you listened to me when I said it a ways back. I had no credibility then. I do not have it now. I will still not have any credibility when investors get slammed to death in 2010.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 5:39 PM, DuncanDeac wrote:

    Sadly, I wonder if Gross isn't right over the intermediate term. Obviously, he's not right over the long-term, which is great for us long-term investors, but macroeconomics may suggest that we will endure a prolonged period of very high inflation. If that's true, over the intermediate term stocks, other than things like Oil stocks, may not be a great investment. That of course means nothing if your time horizon is much longer.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 6:44 PM, stan8331 wrote:

    It's not hard to find folks predicting doom AFTER a major market crash. Inflation is a serious concern. We've sprayed money around like confetti to avoid another Great Depression, and I believe that was absolitely the right thing to do. Reining that spending growth back in, once the danger of a depression is past, will be a painful process. If we refuse to accept the pain, we could be in for decades of zero growth, ala Japan.

    But the thing is, we're not Japan. We have a far more open economy than the Japanese, and we're much less averse to taking risks. Although it can get you in big trouble, as we're seeing right now, the wllingness to accept risk is a critical ingredient for growth.

    If we can make significant inroads in three areas - healthcare costs, defense spending and a transition from foreign to domestic energy - it could provide a platform for explosive growth in the coming decade.

    I'm not claiming there isn't a case to be made that America is going to hell in a handbasket. We have a lot of problems. History tells us that all major civilizations have eventually failed. The doomsayers will EVENTUALLY be right, but I'm willing to bet we still have a good distance yet to go...

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 7:10 PM, wonteach wrote:

    One only needs to scan down to the end of this article to recognize its bias. The entire article is just a sales pitch for one of Motley Fool's newsletters. Of course no one would subscribe to it if everyone believed the market is going down, so they very poorly and transparently "disguise" a sales pitch as an advice column.

    Sleazy and worthless.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 8:13 PM, olwreckdiver wrote:

    Yeah, I too am PLENTY tired of Motley Fool's use of "stories" to push their newsletters - Thought it was a good thing, but think I'll drop it when current subscription is up.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2009, at 10:18 PM, sumbawa wrote:

    Amanda: you say "pessimism is at a peak". I'm not sure about that. October 2008 was a peak, but perhaps not the peak.

    There's a Polyanna element to some of the present talk of "green shoots". Unemployment is still rising sharply, house prices still falling. But most significantly we are still in the throes of a banking crisis that has not been tackled properly.

    Bill Gross may be talking up his own shop, but corporate bonds are pricing in some very bad news right now. If that's correct, then equities are quite overvalued and should be avoided for now. If that's wrong, then corporate bonds are a historic bargain, and perhaps they should be favored over equities. So either way it doesn't look so great for equities.

    If there's one thing this last year has taught me: it's that sometimes long term investors need to think short term. That is, preserve capital and try to avoid danger. Right now we are in dangerous times.

  • Report this Comment On April 22, 2009, at 1:42 PM, pedorrero wrote:

    Give the Fool a break. Yes,they're a business, and they have a product to sell. But for years,many of us have also a source of information (albeit, biased) as well as all the forums. Ironically, stocks might be an exellent investment if TMF ever folds (not that I wish that on them.) For everything else, there's Visa,no wait, Gold and silver ...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 879766, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 3:54:19 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
BAC $16.09 Up +0.01 +0.06%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
MET $33.90 Down -0.30 -0.88%
MetLife, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
SNY $37.67 Down -0.01 -0.03%
Sanofi-Aventis (AD… CAPS Rating: *****
AFL $44.10 Up +0.26 +0.59%
Aflac, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
GM $0.75 Down +0.00 +0.00%
General Motors Cor… CAPS Rating: *
AMGN $55.38 Down -0.68 -1.21%
Amgen, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
C $4.20 Down -0.06 -1.41%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Fed Model: The Fed Model (not endorsed by the Federal Reserve) hypothesizes that the market is in equilibrium when the earnings yield on the S&P 500 matches the yield on the 10 year Treasury note. Any dissonance in the relationship would show that equity valuations are out of whack.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!