Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



The Case for Mutual Funds

For years, we've pointed out that the majority of funds underperform the market. But not all of them do -- and if you can find the ones that have tried-and-true ways to beat the market, you'll do better in the long run.

Point taken
As it turns out, quite a few funds have managed to beat the S&P 500 over time. If you crunch the numbers at any given time, you'll typically find hundreds of funds beating the index even over long time horizons. What's more, that list includes funds from all over the style and market-cap spectrums, which indicates to us that they're headed by talented stock pickers, not folks who just happened to find themselves in the right place at the right time.

So how do you find those winners in advance? Here's a hint: You have to start by looking beyond past performance.

Fund facts
The reason why is that past performance is only so useful when it comes to gauging a fund's future prospects. We believe that you're more likely to find tomorrow's winners if you bring a comprehensive set of principles to bear on the universe of mutual funds and see which ones pass muster.

Performance is one screen we use, but we also focus on fees, volatility, tax efficiency, managerial tenure, strategy, and consistency with stated objectives. Fancy-schmancy analytical types might call it a "mosaic" approach. We prefer to say that we ask a consistent set of questions and then use the answers to separate the champs from the duds.

Far beyond the revelation that finding funds that can beat the market is more doable than you might have imagined, the case for mutual funds goes on. For starters, well-chosen funds can provide quick and easy exposure to the market's various sectors and industries, lending your portfolio the kind of diversification that can help insulate you from volatility during turbulent times. No single piece of bad corporate news is likely to sink your fund, as it might an individual stock.

And that's true even if the bad news involves the fund families themselves. Even those who owned funds implicated in the trading-abuse schemes from the early 2000s had little reason to dump their shares the moment that sorry news broke. Because the value of funds is a function of their underlying holdings, those unfortunate shareholders had ample time to weigh the tax implications of selling and determine where they'd park their money next.

Funds also provide you easy access to relatively esoteric asset classes. When, for instance, was the last time you bought a convertible or high-yield bond? How 'bout stocks from the emerging markets of Russia, Brazil, or South Korea? Securities like these can play a role in many an investor's portfolio, and mutual funds make it easy to increase your exposure to them.

Last but not least, there's cost. Unlike with stocks, you don't have to pay a broker a commission each time you buy shares of mutual funds. And though that much-maligned "typical" fund sports an expense ratio of around 1.5%, some of our favorite funds cost less than 1% per year.

Choosy investors choose champs
Not for nothing, in other words, are mutual funds the investment vehicle of choice for so many of us. They're convenient, cost-effective, and a lot less risky than individual stocks. And for folks who have things to do other than check their stocks every five minutes, mutual funds provide a peace-of-mind alternative (or supplement). Indeed, for serious long-term investors, we'd argue that mutual funds are just about the perfect investment vehicle.

The point is -- and this is where many passive investors go astray -- what fund you buy matters, and it matters a lot. The essence of Foolishness has always been that investors willing to do their homework can whip up on the Gucci-loafered Wise with one hand tied behind their checkbooks. Picking the right fund is every bit as important as picking the right stock, if not more so.

How so? For one thing, much as we all like to regard ourselves as buy-and-holders, when it comes to individual stocks, too many of us fail that test. With funds, at least, we tend to be better behaved. We tend not only to buy and hold, but also to keep investing new money in our funds in good markets and bad.

Good for us -- assuming we've picked right to begin with, of course. So let's take a closer look at some of the factors we use to find the best funds.

Read/Post Comments (9) | Recommend This Article (94)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2014, at 8:56 AM, Pokie813 wrote:

    Sometimes it makes me sick the way the Fool continues to hawk more products when I have already made an investment in the Fool and want straight info but instead am fed more advertisements. Anyone else get tired of this????

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Yyz wrote:

    I notice that as well.

  • Report this Comment On June 08, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Doc13 wrote:

    Just purchased this service and the links all lead to additional purchases required. The last time I felt like this was at a Disney event constantly hawking heir wares.

  • Report this Comment On June 18, 2014, at 11:35 AM, phwitte wrote:

    I agree completely - with above comments - this technique stinks

  • Report this Comment On June 18, 2014, at 11:37 AM, phwitte wrote:

    I agree with previous complaints - that the procedure that is being used is really offputting

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2014, at 11:50 AM, rdietel wrote:

    I have to agree. I hope they don't become like the other SPAMMERS out there. Just a lot of useless noise.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2014, at 12:57 AM, pokobbaby wrote:

    I think their service is fine you dont have to push everylink

  • Report this Comment On January 01, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Vivekananda wrote:

    I agree with earlier comments. Even after you pay huge sum $1500.00, They are pushing more product rather than giving value for the money they got from you, I hope Tom or David sees this.

  • Report this Comment On March 15, 2015, at 3:18 PM, pinheiro29 wrote:

    Tom and David please read the comments, again.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 866926, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2016 8:09:38 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes