Yet Another Search Engine

How much money do you think it would take to compete with Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) ? I don't know if I would even try to enter the Internet search engine arena. But it's so hot that another search engine, Accoona, tossed its hat into the ring. President Clinton presided over the launch and hoped everyone involved would "make lots of money." Apparently, Accoona, using its infinity sign (see the logo on the Web page) to either disguise or enhance its Google-esque double Os, is ready to dethrone Google as the Internet search king. Before you start wondering when the IPO is coming, let's take a moment to think about what's really going on here.

First, Accoona is trying to use a two-pronged attack against Google, coupling its own artificial intelligence technology and exclusive content through a partnership with the Chinese government to allow Accoona to search the database of Chinese businesses. Combining Slick Willy and the potential to get inside the huge Chinese economy isn't a bad publicity stunt. Without traffic, the revenue won't flow.

Second, the technology doesn't work very well. Try it for yourself. I did a search on Nike (NYSE: NKE  ) , given Phil Knight's recent announcement that he is retiring. After scrolling through 50 listings, I never got to the Nike website. Does that seem like a relevant search? It's a young technology, so I will give it the benefit of the doubt for now. But even if the technology is better, what if it takes too long for it to become useful and never catches on?

Third, Google should not be Accoona's sole focus. Between Google, Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO  ) , A9 from Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) , and the new MSN Search from Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) , there is $407 billion of market capitalization and $70 billion in cash for Accoona to contend with. That's a lot of incremental capital that will be spent refining and creating search technologies, creating complementary products, and marketing the heck out of them. Seems like Accoona is bringing a knife to a gunfight.

I'm also skeptical of the Chinese government. The Chinese government knows how to use its leverage to get what it wants, and what it wants is foreign investment capital and a place to ship its products. So who's to say that the government agency's database isn't just a bunch of hype to market the Chinese economy? Always remember, caveat emptor.

Even if you offered me $70 billion, I am not sure I could effectively break into the search engine business. To me, Accoona's late entry is a sign that the teams headed for the playoffs have been named and the competition will now begin in earnest. But maybe I'm wrong. As Rick Aristotle Munarriz pointed out, maybe it's just starting to boom. Either way, there's some tough competition down the road from the big guys in the search engine business.

For related Fool Takes, see:

Fool contributor David Meier owns shares in Nike but not in any of the other companies mentioned.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 504181, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/16/2014 5:53:13 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement