Recs

0

The FDA Hammers Pfizer

I remember a time when the COX-2 drugs, Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE  ) Celebrex and Merck's (NYSE: MRK  ) Vioxx, were a major story, not because they were a danger to public health, but because they represented an advance in medical care. The COX-2 drugs were thought to be a good thing for those people with minor and chronic pain who frequently used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen and naproxen. The problem with the NSAIDs is that they cause all sorts of problems related to intestinal bleeding. This is not a trivial matter: More than 100,000 people are hospitalized each year for this.

Seeing a need for safer treatments, the COX-2 drugs were developed with the specific purpose of keeping the beneficial properties of the NSAIDs without the nasty intestinal bleeding side effect. Drugs like Celebrex and Vioxx became major blockbusters because of this property.

Unfortunately, as it turns out, these COX-2 drugs have problems of their own. Merck voluntarily withdrew Vioxx last year when a clinical study showed that patients who used Vioxx for longer than 18 months had an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. On the basis of that finding, there were suspicions that other drugs in the class could have the same problems.

In February of this year, the FDA's Arthritis and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee convened to discuss all of these drugs. It then voted on whether or not to recommend that the FDA allow specific drugs to remain on the market. While Celebrex received a positive 31-1 vote in favor of remaining on the market, Pfizer's other COX-2 drug, Bextra, and Merck's Vioxx squeaked by with 17-13 and 17-15 votes, respectively.

In light of that close vote, it should not be surprising that the FDA asked Pfizer to pull Bextra off the market yesterday. Sales of Bextra in both the U.S. and Europe have ceased, at least for the time being, since Pfizer disputes the FDA's position.

Bextra was certainly a blockbuster, with over $1.3 billion sales in 2004. There are not many companies that could take this kind of blow and go on with business as usual. But Pfizer is one of them, since Bextra was just a drop in the bucket compared to the company's overall revenue of $52.5 billion last year. That is certainly one advantage to owning companies like Pfizer in an era of intense scrutiny of drug safety.

For additional articles on the biotech industry, see:

Merck is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation.

Fool contributor Charly Travers is the Motley Fool Rule Breakers biotech analyst. He does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 491432, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/13/2012 9:00:23 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,874.04 72.81 0.57%
S&P 500 1,351.77 9.13 0.68%
NASD 2,931.39 27.51 0.95%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/13/2012 4:00 PM
PFE $21.30 Up +0.25 +1.19%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
MRK $38.11 Up +0.20 +0.53%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement