No Dicey Results for Cubist

Recs

15

2006 was a nice year for Cubist Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: CBST), but you wouldn't know that by looking at the company's stock price, which is sitting near 52-week lows. Cubist received approval from the FDA for a market-expanding new use for its antibiotic treatment Cubicin and grew revenues 61% vs. 2005.

Cubist had already pre-released its sales numbers for the fourth quarter three weeks ago, so its sales numbers came as no surprise. Revenue gained 53% to $56.5 million year over year, and gross margins improved 3% to 75%. Earnings were finally in the black at $5 million ($0.10 per share) versus a year-ago loss of almost $7 million, even with higher research and development spending.

Several other stories in the media mentioned Cubist's "lackluster" outlook for the first quarter this year, where sales are expected to be flat versus the fourth quarter. But ever since Cubicin has been on the market, sales have always been sequentially flat in these quarters, so it should come as no surprise that they are flat again this year. 2007's estimates aren't bad at all, though, with Cubist guiding for U.S. net product revenue in the $255 million-$275 million range and earnings of at least $27 million for the year, by my calculations. The only thing holding back earnings next year is the $16 million jump in R&D spending as Cubist initiates more clinical trials to expand Cubicin's label and patent life.

There are some big unknowns that will likely be resolved next year. Besides a possible product acquisition on which Cubist may use its more than $300 million in cash, there is also the resolution of the search for a Japanese partner for Cubicin, which should bring in $10 million-$20 million in up-front payments.

One risk that's worth watching out for -- and which Cubist mentioned -- is the possibility that a paragraph IV filing by a generic company may occur as early as September. Nonetheless, with the FDA's 30-month stay of action on these filings and numerous patents protecting Cubicin, there are many challenges for a generic competitor to overcome before it could begin selling a generic version of the drug. So for the near term at least, investors have nothing to worry about on this front.

Shares of Cubist aren't exactly expensive, with more than $50 million in cash flow expected for next year, sales growing at a rapid clip, and only a $970 million market capitalization. As long as Cubist doesn't make a bad acquisition with that cash hoard, then shares look cheap at today's prices.

Need new ideas for your money? Talk stocks with other investors and our analysts when you give our newsletters a try.

Fool contributor Brian Lawler does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 520810, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 3:40:13 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
CBST $16.95 Down -0.10 -0.59%
Cubist Pharmaceuti… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Fed Model: The Fed Model (not endorsed by the Federal Reserve) hypothesizes that the market is in equilibrium when the earnings yield on the S&P 500 matches the yield on the 10 year Treasury note. Any dissonance in the relationship would show that equity valuations are out of whack.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!