QLT Pays Up

Recs

8

A biotech doesn't have much value without a strong patent estate. On Friday, drugmaker QLT (Nasdaq: QLTI) took the right step to shore up its intellectual property after it agreed to settle a lawsuit going all the way back to 2003.

QLT agreed to pay $113 million to settle a patent infringement lawsuit filed by TAP Pharmaceuticals and other plaintiffs over QLT's sales of its prostate cancer treatment Eligard. This settlement clears the way for QLT and marketing partner Sanofi-Aventis (NYSE: SNY) to continue selling Eligard in the U.S. and Canada without having to pay any royalties on sales, although there is still some unresolved litigation in Germany over QLT's sales of the drug.

Some investors had high hopes for Eligard when QLT brought in the drug with its acquisition of Atrix Laboratories in 2004. It has one of the most convenient dosing schedules of any of the prostate cancer hormonal treatments, with the option for a six-month dose versus the one-month treatment that many of the other drugs require. Sales of the drug finally started to pick up in 2006, growing 31% to $84 million for the first nine months of the year.

At the moment cash is not a problem for QLT, as it brought in $12 million from operating activities in the third quarter last year alone. After paying out for the settlement, QLT will still have $265 million in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet as of the end of 2006.

QLT is not my favorite drug stock, and with Genentech's (NYSE: DNA) Lucentis gobbling up much of QLT's Visudyne market share as a treatment for blindness-causing macular degeneration, QLT really needs that cash to help shore up its pipeline. It was smart of QLT to settle with TAP and the other plaintiffs to help reduce its litigation costs and mitigate its liabilities, but the company could have avoided this whole situation had it not overpaid for Atrix Laboratories and Eligard when it acquired them for $855 million.

QLT is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems selection. You can view the entire Hidden Gems scorecard with your free trial.

Fool contributor Brian Lawler does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 521887, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 6:16:09 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

3/26/2009 4:00 PM
DNA $94.97 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Genentech, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
SNY $36.70 Down -0.35 -0.94%
Sanofi-Aventis (AD… CAPS Rating: *****
QLTI $3.62 Up +0.06 +1.69%
QLT, Inc. (USA) CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Buying in thirds: Buying in thirds is a time-honored Motley Fool practice, teaching investors to enter an eventual "full" stockholding in three separate lots. This is typically advisable for those who are new to investing, those who like a stock long-term but worry about its present valuation being high, and those who like to dollar-cost average.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!