This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

26

Special Offer!

Jan 12, Motley Fool Pro will accept new members for 10 days only. Your spot is reserved! To learn more, click below.

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
Shares of Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendation Buffalo Wild Wings (Nasdaq: BWLD) are getting clipped this morning, tumbling 8% in response to an "underweight" recommendation from megabanker JP Morgan. Adding to the confusion, I suspect, is the fact that no one seems to know why JP thinks you should sell Buffalo Wild. None of the mainstream media has yet reported on JP's reasoning. So all we really know at this point is that: (1) JP Morgan hadn't previously covered the stock and (2) now that JP's taken a look, it doesn't like what it sees.

Oh, and (3) when it comes to picking winners (and losers), JP's in the top 10% of CAPS players, boasting a CAPS rating of 90.72. Ugh. Not good.

Let's go to the tape
Or is it? As an individual investor myself, I know how frustrating it can be to see a sell rating stuck on your stock, and not know how it got there. Frustrating, but all too common. When something like this happens, though, there is at least one place an investor can turn for guidance and perspective: Motley Fool CAPS.

In that special community of investors, we've been tracking JP's performance for well over a year, measuring how well its picks have turned out. And you may be surprised to learn that while JP does indeed boast a high CAPS score, it does so more by virtue of verbosity (making many, many picks) than accuracy. When you come right down to it, JP gets only 51% of its calls right -- putting it just this side of a flipped coin for predictive value.

To illustrate, here are a few of the calls it's made right in recent months ...

Company

JP Said:

CAPS Says (out of 5):

JP's Pick Beating S&P by:

MasterCard (NYSE: MA)

Outperform

***

100 points

Wendy's (NYSE: WEN)

Underperform

**

24 points

Cheesecake Factory (Nasdaq: CAKE)

Underperform

***

16 points

... and here are a few that it's made wrong:

Company

JP Said:

CAPS Says:

JP's Pick Trailing S&P by:

Ruth's Chris (Nasdaq: RUTH)

Outperform

***

43 points

Ruby Tuesday (NYSE: RT)

Outperform

*

42 points

Dardens Restaurants (NYSE: DRI)

Outperform

**

33 points

As you can see, JP Morgan has made a couple of good calls in the restaurant industry (nothing to compare with its brilliant endorsement of MasterCard outside that industry, however). Meanwhile, it's stumbled pretty badly on at least three restaurant picks -- more than wiping out any gains its clients would have reaped from the right calls on Wendy's and Cheesecake Factory.

Foolish takeaway
Judging from today's trading action, investors appear to be taking JP's sell-ish rating on Buffalo Wild on faith. But judging from the analyst's record, I'm going to have to say that faith appears misguided. Moreover, when I look at Buffalo Wild, I see a stock trading at 18 times expected 2008 earnings, and one expected by most analysts to keep on growing those earnings at 24% per year for at least the next half decade. What's not to like in that?

Granted, free cash flow devotees can quibble over the fact that Buffalo Wild's cash profits don't measure up to the net income that it reports under GAAP, but that's not at all uncommon among fast-growing restaurateurs who pour their cash profits back into store expansion. (Cheesecake, for example, has done this for years.)

Buffalo Wild has an entirely reasonable share price, strong growth prospects, and plenty of operating cash flow to fund its growth -- and let's not forget the endorsement of master small-cap growth investor Tom Gardner at Motley Fool Hidden Gems. So I have to contradict JP Morgan today. Buffalo Wild is no "underweight" -- it's a heavyweight at a discount price.

For every post you make to CAPS or any Foolish discussion board in the month of December, The Motley Fool will donate $0.02 to charity. So give us your two cents and we'll pay it forward!

"The most exciting development in my lifetime!" 15 years ago, Motley Fool founder David Gardner uncovered a secret that changed how he'd invest forever. It can make you money in up, down, and rollercoaster markets. To learn more, enter your email address now.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 20, 2007, at 4:10 PM, jojx wrote:

    Instead of your commenting on the analyst's employer, I'd appreciate your commenting on his analysis, as reported by AP:

    Buffalo Wild Wings Shares Drop

    AP

    Posted: 2007-12-20 14:06:51

    NEW YORK (AP) - A J.P. Morgan analyst advised investors to shed shares of Buffalo Wild Wings Inc. Thursday, leading to a big drop in the stock price.

    Analyst Steven Rees initiated coverage on the company at "Underweight" and said in a note to investors that although the wing chain has reported strong same-store sales, or sales at locations open at least a year, sales have started to display some signs of weakness.

    Same-store sales is a key indicator of restaurant performance since it measures growth at existing locations rather than newly-opened ones.

    Rees said sales have slowed recently, due partly to its "heavy exposure" to the Midwest and a reliance on middle income consumers, who are being heavily impacted by higher gasoline prices and the weak housing market.

    The analyst added that Buffalo Wild Wings has targeted earnings-per-share growth of 25 percent for the next three years, but "in our opinion, this will become increasingly difficult to achieve going forward given current sales and operating cost pressures."

    Operating costs have jumped this year due to higher prices for chicken, dairy and grains. Those costs have gone up partly because of demand for the alternative fuel ethanol, which is made from corn. Corn is also used to make animal feed, so higher corn prices mean more expensive feed costs for chicken, cattle and dairy farmers. Those higher costs are then passed on to restaurant operators.

    Rees noted that chicken wings comprise about 25 percent of the company's cost of goods.

    Shares fell $2.29, or 8.5 percent, to $24.71 in afternoon trading.

  • Report this Comment On December 20, 2007, at 5:06 PM, crca99 wrote:

    I appreciate the Foolish Takeaway section. thx.

  • Report this Comment On December 20, 2007, at 10:20 PM, TMFDitty wrote:

    crca99, you're very welcome.

    jojx, that's a fair criticism, to which I'd respond thusly: I waited until 13.30 EST for someone, anyone, to expand on JP's rationale for the initiation, to no avail. But the title of the column *is* "this just in." A Fool can't wait forever for details and still comment on the upgrade while it's fresh.

    As for the substance of JP's comments, thanks for highlighting it, and now that it's public, I'll be glad to comment: "Bunk."

    Gas prices have been high for the last two years. If they haven't killed BWLD's same-store sales yet, I don't see why they're gonna just because JP thinks they should. And as for the housing market's effect... let me just express extreme skepticism over the commonly accepted Wisdom that there's an initmate connection between the price of a McMansion and the ability to afford a Happy Meal. And I'll leave it at that.

    Finally, the one JP observation that holds more merit is the rising commodities costs. But I think Sally Smith has adequately addressed that in her two interviews with Hidden Gems. You can read her responses there for yourself.

    Foolish best, and thanks for the feedback everyone,

    Rich

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 557175, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 1/9/2009 6:28:16 AM

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access to keep reading:

“This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades”

Signing up allows you to comment on articles and on the discussion boards.

It's completely FREE and will take only 10 seconds.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Most Recommended

Jan 8 at 4:06 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,742.46 -27.24 -0.31%
S&P 500 909.73 +3.08 +0.34%
NASD 1,617.01 +17.95 +1.12%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Buffalo Wild Wings

CAPS Rating 4/5 Stars

$25.06

+0.44 (+1.79%)

Outperform4359

Underperform292

Rate This Stock