This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

8

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Since 2002, David and Tom Gardner have returned 28.89% while the S&P 500 returned -11.53%. Try Stock Advisor free for 30 days.

Stock Advisor

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the worst …
Shares of Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendation Natus Medical (Nasdaq: BABY) are defying the market rebound this morning, dropping for a second straight day after receiving a downgrade to hold from CAPS pariah Needham & Co.

With a record of guessing wrong on its picks 57% of the time, and a CAPS score so negative at this point that Needham underperforms more than 80% of investors worldwide, you might not expect investors to react so, well, negatively to a downgrade from Needham. To the contrary, you might expect them to take this downgrade as a contrarian indicator that it's time to buy, buy BABY.

Let's go to the tape
After all, Needham has picked more than its share of barkers over the years:

Company

Needham Said:

CAPS Says:

Needham's Pick Lagging S&P by:

MEMC Electronic Materials 

(NYSE: WFR)

Outperform

****

24 points

LDK Solar (NYSE: LDK)

Outperform

***

16 points

Evergreen Solar

Outperform

***

14 points

Fortunately though, Natus Medical has precious little to do with the deflating solar bubble, and much more to do with technology and medical technology in particular -- an area where Needham's shown some real proficiency:

Company

Needham Said:

CAPS Says:

Needham's Pick Beating S&P by:

Martek Biosciences 

Outperform

*****

60 points

Medtronic (NYSE: MDT)

Outperform

****

12 points

Nuance Communications

(Nasdaq: NUAN)

Outperform

****

5 points

The reasoning
With its firm grasp of the medical sphere already proven, you have to weigh carefully the reasons Needham cited in downgrading Natus yesterday. Key to the bear thesis here (or at least the not-quite-bull -- Needham only dropped Natus to "hold" after all), is the fear that hospitals across the country are cutting their capital budgets, leaving a smaller revenue pool in which BABY can play.

Needham cited recent comments from GE (NYSE: GE) Healthcare regarding its own struggles to sell into a hospital market in which GE, Natus, and -- well, let's not leave anybody out -- Rule Breakers recommendation Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq: ISRG) too -- all participate. In consequence of which, Needham predicts a decline in Natus's "hearing, screening and newborn care products" next year (although overall revenues should grow inorganically, thanks to Natus's recent purchase of NeuroCom International).

So let's see now: Competence in the medical sphere? Check. Logical argument? Check. Abysmal record picking stocks, generally? Unfortunately, that's also a check -- but here's one thing you may not know about Needham that, in my opinion, rebuts the presumption that an underperforming analyst as tracked by CAPS, generally, is wrong on every specific pick: Needham's an absolute genius when it comes to Natus.

These bankers discovered Natus back in March 2007, and since initiating coverage with a buy rating then, Needham's Natus pick has simply thrashed the market -- up 30% in 18 months, versus a 17% decline for the S&P 500.

Foolish takeaway
After a run-up like that, you can't really blame Needham for wanting to declare victory and go home. It is victorious, to the tune of 47 points worth of market outperformance.

As for investors who've shared the wealth alongside Needham, I suggest they do likewise. With Natus now selling for a 43 P/E and a price-to-free cash flow ratio of nearly 55, I just don't see a lot more upside here, Fools. Time to count your winnings and start looking for the next big win.

Follow along with the Global Gains team as they travel to key business centers in China to uncover the very best investing opportunities! Sign up here to receive their FREE dispatches from the road.

And where better to start than with the folks who introduced you to Natus in the first place? Start your free trial to Motley Fool Hidden Gems today, and let's find that winner together.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 379 out of more than 115,000 players. Nuance Communications and Natus Medical are Hidden Gems picks. Intuitive Surgical is a Rule Breakers recommendation. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2008, at 8:16 PM, davidnierenberg wrote:

    Please notice, however, that when Needham downgraded BABY yesterday they raised their 2009 EPS estimate to 95 cents. Your backward looking approach to valuation, coming as it is in the end of September, is a lot less useful than a forward looking valuation, particularly for a company which has been growing sales and EPS as fast as BABY has been since Jim Hawkins became the CEO four years ago. BABY's forward PE is only about 23 at today's closing price. That means that the company's PE to Growth ratio is under .5, which says to me that the shares are not over-priced at this level.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2008, at 8:32 PM, davidnierenberg wrote:

    A second way to think about forward valuation would be total entrerprise value to forward revenues----market cap plus debt minus cash and investments, divided by forward revenues. BABY's current TEV is about $500M. The market expects the company to make one or more acquistions soon so that the company's 2009 revenues might be in the vicinity of $250M. Hawkins has made seven smart acquisitions in the past four years, so he deserves the benefit of the doubt on this. Thus BABY's TEV ratio to forward sales would be about 2. Good medical device companies often trade in the 3-4 times range, much higher than 2, as their "moats" include patents and FDA approval. Another "moat" relevant to the value of BABY's core business is that it enjoys about a 90% market share in newborn hearing screening. Also a very significant portion of the company's revenues are from the regularly recurring use of disposables, which are consumed each time a baby is screened for hearing deficit. This combination of patent moat, FDA moat, market share moat, and recurring revenues are the sorts of factors which justify the kind of TEV/Sales ratios which we often find when evaluating medical device companies.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2008, at 8:39 PM, davidnierenberg wrote:

    One final point, then i will be quiet: how well would you have done had you sold BABY the last time the Needham analyst downgraded it? What might you have left on the table? Motley Fool subscribers pay income taxes. Does it make sense to dart in and out of good companies, paying the transactional costs and income taxes along the way each time, without any regard for how they eat away at your capital? Since Jim Hawkins became the CEO of BABY, the share price has zoomed from 4 to the current 22. He has done a terrific job. Those of us who have stayed with him all the way, as we have, will be paying long term capital gains taxes, while those who dart in and out will be paying a lot more in taxes and commissions. I am not smart enough to dart in and out of good companies. There aren't that many good companies anyway. I would rather sit with something which has done well and let my gains compound tax free. I have been a BABY shareholder since it was a private company in 1989. I don't mind letting my winners run.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2008, at 2:03 AM, TMFDitty wrote:

    Thanks for chiming in, David. First off, for anyone reading these comments, let me point out that you found Natus before we did. Before Needham did. Before 'most anybody did. And I know better than to argue with someone smarter than I... so I won't. :)

    But I would clarify just one point for our readers:

    To get to your 0.5 PEG ratio, you've got to do two things: First, use the forward earnings (which are only a *guess* at what will be earned next year). Second, divide them by the one-year projected earnings growth rate of 51%. That does indeed generate your 0.5 PEG.

    The more conservative PEG-ulation, however, would be to divide the factual, trailing P/E (now 42) by the 5-year projected growth rate (19) -- this kicks the PEG all the way up to 2.2.

    To me, that's a scary valuation -- then again, I'm by nature a worrier.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2008, at 2:04 AM, TMFDitty wrote:

    P.S. David's absolutely right about the taxes and trading costs.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 737244, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/6/2009 4:06:10 AM

Keep Reading:

“This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades”

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Get involved! »

Most Recent

Jul 2 at 4:22 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,280.74 -223.32 -2.63%
S&P 500 896.42 -26.91 -2.91%
NASD 1,796.52 +0.00 +0.00%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Natus Medical, Inc.

CAPS Rating 5/5 Stars

$11.22

-0.30 (-2.60%)

Outperform1486

Underperform29

Rate This Stock