Don't Buy These Stocks Today

Recs

34

This time last year, I ran a screen for cheap small-cap stocks with good operating metrics. Of the 284 small caps that popped up trading for less than two times book value with returns on equity north of 15%, 27 were banks. That list included Preferred Bank (Nasdaq: PFBC), First Midwest (Nasdaq: FMBI), and Silver State Bancorp.

But I told you not to invest, and I hope you took my advice.

Why small and cheap is good
Both of these names, and many more like them, are down significantly over the past year -- Preferred Bank to the tune of 75%, First Midwest 37%, and Silver State 99%. Sure, all investors should seek out cheap small caps with good operating metrics; stocks like these can provide outsized returns to long-term investors, to the tune of more than 5 percentage points per year. But the recent experience of small-cap banks imparts an important lesson about the difference between trailing metrics and future outlooks.

As you've probably heard on the news, the entire financial sector has been sledgehammered this year by tightening liquidity, thanks to a subprime-mortgage writedown bonanza. Former stalwarts Capital One (NYSE: COF), State Street (NYSE: STT), and Legg Mason (NYSE: LM) are down 35%, 53%, and 70%, respectively, while Lehman Brothers has gone entirely out of business.

This is the consequence of write-offs, liquidity freezes, recapitalizations, collapsing housing and equity markets, and rising inflation …with many of these events continuing to threaten financial stocks today. And then you have government involvement, which is another entirely unpredictable variable!

Excuse me while I ... state the obvious
That industry carnage was the reason why small-cap banks looked cheap, but I'm very glad I wasn't buying.

And though these stocks have gotten cheaper, I'm still not buying. Here's why:

  1. With so many writedowns happening in the industry, it's hard to know which stated book values you can trust; a substantial writedown at a small bank could put it out of business.
  2. There's no near-term catalyst.
  3. All of those aforementioned unpredictable variables.

Early is wrong
Now, if you also like cheap stocks (and tally-ho if you do), you're ready to tell me to stop looking a gift horse in the mouth, to take cheap when I can get it, and to get ready to buy more if the banks I should be buying today fall further.

That's fine and dandy in theory, but as master money manager Ron Muhlenkamp reminded me when I shared these same thoughts with him last fall, "If you're two years early, you're one and a half years wrong."

It's neither fun nor profitable to be one and a half years wrong.

Of course, Muhlenkamp also helped me put my thoughts in perspective. "The purpose of screens," he said, "is to get you to ask the right questions. You're doing that. A time will come when you want to own them."

Disciplined investing means waiting for that time
In other words, here's what I know:

  1. Small banks look cheap.
  2. I don't want to own them.
  3. If they still look cheap when I want to own them, it will be time to back up the truck.

That time will come when we see the housing sector start to rebound, a catalyst starts to materialize, and balance sheets look reliably, well, reliable. While that may be asking too much, as Warren Buffett has said, there are no "called strikes" in investing.

There's good news, though: Recent market volatility means that there are cheap small caps with good operating metrics outside the banking industry, and our Motley Fool Hidden Gems small-cap investing team has our eye on a good number of them.

To see the stocks we're recommending today, click here to join Hidden Gems free for 30 days.

This article was first published Nov. 16, 2007. It has been updated.

Tim Hanson does not own shares of any company mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Legg Mason, which is also a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. The Fool's disclosure policy reveals all positions when they exist ... including the naked straddle.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 02, 2009, at 4:10 PM, kstoltz wrote:

    I'll ask the newbie questions then:

    If you're waiting on the catalyst to occur, aren't you also missing out on the initial gains, and risking that you will simply be getting into a stock after everyone and his brother has also jumped onboard?

    If a stock looks cheap, and you've done enough homework to feel that it will turnaround and will not be heading for bankruptcy, why worry about whether you are 1 and a half years wrong?

    I'll point out that the oft-quoted Buffett has bought many, many stocks for which he bided his time, certain that eventually the market would reflect the true value of the stock.

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2009, at 7:54 AM, SOICF2 wrote:

    What are Motley Fool's best Obama Administration stimulus package --- Alternative Energy, Infrastructure, Health Care, and whatever else picks?

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2009, at 8:59 AM, rutecash wrote:

    Hi Fools

    I'm a newbie becoming financially literate for the first time in my life. Even though I lost plenty recently, I feel that the meltdown was the best thing to ever happen to me financially. I had been taking the advice of a "planner" associated with my bank and never really knew what I was doing or why. Now I'm learning that I can have complete control over my money [good or bad] and feel more empowered than ever thanks in part to TMF. I have time to make up the losses and feel great about the future no matter what happens though I wish more of my family members would learn more about their money. Anyway , thanks Fools for the lively chat on a huge number of topics. It really helps me with my own research.

    P.S.

    What do the Fools think is the best way to benefit from oils' inevitable rise?

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Jimmy2008 wrote:

    RE: What do the Fools think is the best way to benefit from oils' inevitable rise?

    There was an article on seekingalpha.com on oil and oil stocks. The author feels that oil is a better buy right now than oil stocks.

  • Report this Comment On January 14, 2009, at 11:12 AM, davidkubica1 wrote:

    Most people when you ask them about investments will simply focus on the big 3: stocks, bonds, and cash. It is because this is all they know. I would recommend looking into researching managed futures if you would like to better diversify.

    If you are interested in managed futures, you can try www.managedfuturesdepot.com. They usually have some pretty good programs that they offer. This one: http://www.managedfuturesdepot.com/NDXShadrach1108.pdf had a return in 2008 of over 128% and has averaged a monthly return of over 8% since its inception 5 years ago. The nice thing about these performance sheets is that you know they are authentic. Managed futures returns are regulated vigorously by the CFTC and are all stated NET OF EXPENSES.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 800206, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/4/2009 10:54:03 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Get involved! »

Most Recent

Jul 2 at 4:22 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,280.74 -223.32 -2.63%
S&P 500 896.42 -26.91 -2.91%
NASD 1,796.52 +0.00 +0.00%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Capital One Financial Corp.

CAPS Rating 1/5 Stars

$20.79

-1.08 (-4.94%)

Outperform717

Underperform487

Rate This Stock