Why I’m Down More Than 70%, and How to Avoid My Mistakes

Recs

21

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

As any graduate of Alcoholics Anonymous knows, the first step to setting out on the proper path is admitting your weakness. In that spirit, I'm writing about my biggest mistake so far during this bear market. Here. Publicly. For the whole world to see.

If legendary investor Peter Lynch of Fidelity Magellan fame could educate investors by publicly admitting to holding AIG and Fannie Mae at the end of last year, what's an analyst like me got to lose?

I hope two things come of my story:

  1. Someone, somewhere out there learns something from my mistakes. Feel free to consider me a sacrificial teacher.
  2. Having studied psychological commitment and consistency in Robert Cialdini's classic work Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, I hope that my public commitment to avoid repeating these mistakes prevents me from falling victim to them again.

Mea culpa
My greatest investing failure of the past year has been my investment in Allied Irish Banks. To date, I'm down 72% (not long ago, I waved goodbye to more than 90% of my initial investment, but the stock has recently made some movement upward).

True, it's not quite as big a loss as those suffered by investors in Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI), Alcoa (NYSE: AA), or Hartford Financial Services (NYSE: HIG), but what consolation is a few percentage points' difference when you've lost 72%?

And yet, painful though that loss is, seeing how avoidable this was in hindsight hurts even more. Perhaps the only comforting thought is that in Warren Buffett's recent Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) annual report, he writes that he also suffered a significant loss by investing in Irish banks. Some have speculated that AIB was among them. So, at least I was fooled alongside a much better investor.

Following the crowd
My first major mistake was falling prey to social proof. I put too much weight on the research, opinions, and actions of others, without thinking through my investment decision for myself and deciding whether it made sense in my portfolio.

Prior to my purchase of AIB, it had been recommended by our Global Gains newsletter and purchased by the team charging up our real-money Million Dollar Portfolio real-money service. Advisors in both services wrote that the stock was trading with low historical and relative multiples, a very attractive dividend yield, and a significantly undervalued price.

While they made compelling arguments, I failed to carefully evaluate whether I agreed with their assessments. And I became even more hooked as these fellow analysts also began purchasing AIB for their personal portfolios.

As a result, I also began to give in to confirmation bias -- where I sought out opinions that further confirmed my buy decision rather than seeking a contrarian opinion that might indicate danger ahead.

Seth Jayson, co-advisor of our Motley Fool Hidden Gems newsletter service, recently shared with me that confirmation bias is one of the most common predispositions that investors face. He explained that truly great investors develop an ability to honestly look at both sides of an investment thesis.

Anchoring in loose sand
As if those mistakes weren't enough, I also became anchored to the price at which each service recommended the stock. I fixated on those price points; in my mind, anything lower than their entry prices became a clear bargain.

So when AIB fell another 50% from the most recently recommended price, the stock became twice as attractive to me, as did the doubled dividend.

These mistakes fed off each other, collectively convincing me to overlook my normal investment process. I took shortcuts. I failed to perform as much research as I typically do. I fell in love with the stock, viewing it as mostly upside, without truly understanding the risks and pressure points. And I didn't even consider the possibility of a suspended dividend (which recently beset the company).

This company -- which, hurt by the falling Irish economy, recently needed to boost its construction and development loan reserves -- was much more complicated than I originally thought. Andy Cross, also co-advisor at Hidden Gems, recommended to me that investments should always pass what he calls "Einstein's razor," which dictates that an investment thesis "should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." The complexity of AIB forced me to look to other investors and to bypass my investment process.

Lessons learned
The key takeaways from my mistakes, then, are:

  1. While it can be helpful to look at the opinions of others, you still need to carefully consider whether you agree with their investment theses. Even if AIB had risen 72%, it still would have been a mistake for me to buy it, because I hadn't sufficiently examined the reasons for owning it. You must be able to distance yourself from the positions of people you respect.
  2. It's much better to leave a stock's price history out of your analysis so that you're not tricked into a value trap. Companies can, and often do, change. Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) might have seemed like a bargain at the start of 2008, when it was down more than 50% from the previous year. But it wouldn't have been wise to buy -- the stock is down more than 97% from the beginning of 2008. Dryships (Nasdaq: DRYS) and Lear (NYSE: LEA) shared similar fates.
  3. It's best to simply bypass investments that are too complex, or that you don't believe you solidly understand.

These takeaways -- and countless other investor psychology topics -- are heavily studied by Hidden Gems advisors Seth Jayson and Andy Cross as they seek out the world's top small-cap companies. That has now become an even higher priority for them, as they construct a real-money portfolio of their best small-cap ideas for our Hidden Gems newsletter service.

Not only can you see their buy guidance right now, but they're also offering you the chance to read their research so you can see if you agree with their analysis. Click here for a free guest pass -- there's no obligation to subscribe.

Already subscribe to Hidden Gems? Log in here.

This article was originally published April 14, 2009. It has been updated.

Fool analyst Adam J. Wiederman owns shares of both Allied Irish Banks and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool also owns shares of Allied Irish Banks, a Global Gains recommendation, and Berkshire Hathaway, an Inside Value and a Stock Advisor recommendation. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy likes to learn from its mistakes.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2009, at 4:37 PM, JRSmithman wrote:

    You are all idiots this will go back up you are all talking like this is the end of Sirius you would only loose 72% if you went out of it not expecting this to go back up. But this would not be fools website without bashing Sirius

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2009, at 7:49 PM, AZ123 wrote:

    Yeah,

    I think the major problem at MotleyFool is that they employ too many freelance writers who cater to the tabloid-style headlines and follow with very little sound analysis.

    They're too in love with their own (in their view) witty writing style to actually offer up stuff worth reading.

    They bash Sirius, Palm and other stocks that will survive and rise over the next few years.

    However, they just seem too short sighted and ego driven to be responsible or trust worthy.

    Too many Chicken Littles in this MotleyFool hen house...

    I wish the Gadner brothers would revamp this e-news letter, starting by the firing of all of these fools and bringing in qualified writers. But it's not my company.

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2009, at 9:25 PM, willytheg wrote:

    Wow,

    I don't think I've ever seen humility on this on any other financial board, it's really refreshing.

    This, and other, boards reminds me of playing poker in college. If you asked everyone how they did the next day, the money won always seemed to be double the money lost.

    Good luck, what you may have lost in money-and it was probably no less than many of the other posters-you made up for in character. No matter how much $$ you make, you can't buy character. Good luck.

    wgs

  • Report this Comment On June 13, 2009, at 1:44 AM, EgisCoder wrote:

    Here's your why you are down 70%: You think you know what you are talking about.

    You couldn't be more wrong about Sirius XM. Those who believed and averaged down in the company have seen returns of 300% or more since the beginning of this year. The media wants you to believe that it is a bad company and it will never be profitable. Nothing could be further from the truth. They are going to be cash flow positive THIS year. This year, in the face of the worst recession in recent history. This year, in the face of declining auto sales.

    But keep ignoring Sirius XM as an investment. It's PRECISELY why you are 70% in the red.

    Some advice: Take whatever pennies you have left in your portfolio and buy Sirius XM. Do it before they announce the new iPhone application this coming week.

  • Report this Comment On June 14, 2009, at 5:13 AM, TheBuddhistTrade wrote:

    Your interesting article proves to me yet again just how important psychology is in investing and trading, and the comments with their emotional bias and absence of balanced evaluation of the issues discussed pay even more testimony to this fact.

    I am a trader and investor and specialise in the psychology of trading and investing and if I have learned one thing in my life it is this: Investing and trading brings out all our weak points, and believe me, we all have them. However, only the very best of investors and traders have the guts to face up to their shadows, but instead play the game of investing and trading mainly through their unresolved ego needs. Of course to add to the challenge very few have the cognitive awareness to see how they are doing this and how their decisions are tarnished through this lack of awareness as they are swayed by ego needs as well as analysis of other authority figures, like newsletters, CNBC etc.

    The market environment of the past 19 months has made trading and investing very difficult, because we are dealing with a phenomenon not witnessed before. Comparisons with the crash of 1929 do not stand up to close examination, partly because fiscal policies were very different to today’s environment.

    It is a fact of investing and trading that there is always a loser for every winner, depending from which view you are observing a trade. This is the zero sum game often talked about. We tend to forget that the so called zero sum game plays out in every investment/trading transaction. There has to be someone willing to take the opposite side of your trade, or shall we say someone with an opposite opinion or different strategy.

    Warren Buffet’s well proven investment policy is based on a relatively low spread through the markets. His company holds comparatively few positions. This is part of his strategy and has worked very well for him. By the way, there is proof that too much diversification, just as too little, reduces overall returns.

    Since, as the two comments to the very interesting article amply prove, emotions like anger, fear, greed and plain arrogance are something we are all saddled with to a larger or lesser degree, it should be everyone’s first objective to have an investment strategy that suits THEIR PERSOBNALITY. This is vital, because if your strategy suits your personality you are more likely to follow it even when things go against you.

    To believe that all investment decisions or trading decisions will result in profits is like fooling yourself into believing that a coin has only one side, that it has only heads, or only tails.

    Yes, losing is part of the game and the sooner we accept this and learn to deal with our losses without emotion the sooner we become masterful traders and investors.

    The wise investor owns up to his losses and has the inner balance and honesty to calmly stand back and learn from past mistakes to come back into the ring the following day, ready “fight another battle.”

    Let’s remember this: we are all only human and humans learn from their mistakes. There is no right or wrong in this,its simply the process of our evolution.

    Mercedes Oestermann van Essen

  • Report this Comment On June 15, 2009, at 9:04 AM, tquail wrote:

    Did you know that anyone who "graduates" from AA, NA, OA or any of the other A's has ste themselves up for failure. No one graduates from AA.

  • Report this Comment On June 15, 2009, at 11:44 AM, toofoolforcool wrote:

    When I get advice from the "pros" it seems that they are always trying to direct investors in one direction or the other so I tend to ignore them.

    So far in this market I have seen in and out fast seems to be paying off. This will not always be the case I am sure.

    I am an amature who has recently retired and find this investing stuff entertaining.

  • Report this Comment On June 16, 2009, at 9:57 AM, johnhopkins357 wrote:

    It's Ockham's razor. William of Ockham. And it basically states that the simplest explanation is probably the correct one or at least the better one. It places value in the elimination of assumptions. Whoever told you it was Einstein's razor made you look like a FOOL.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 5:20 PM, YoDaddy0429 wrote:

    I was a member of the Million Dollar Portfolio and took their advice and bought a LOT of AIB. I got totally hosed... I made the same mistakes the author did, but I learned a valuable lesson - don't listen to the Fool's advice.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 5:55 PM, ecloud wrote:

    My sequence was:

    buy 30 @ 21.14

    buy 40 @ 16.84

    buy 600 @ 1.57

    sell 170 @ 3.55

    sell 250 @ 6.80

    So even with this stock basically being a mistake, it was still possible to yank a victory out of the jaws of defeat, due to the ridiculous undervaluing of everything last fall. I'm still holding some (which I can consider to be "free" in that the selling that I did has already paid back the initial capital that I invested), because I don't believe that bank is just going to fade away, and why miss out on the chance of a multi-bagger when it eventually recovers? (I don't care if it takes a few years.) But the success of this strategy depended on unusual circumstances. I just did better than usual with this one stock by buying at a sort of low point (although my best buy was still at twice the actual 52-week low!) Of course, at the time of that "buy" I could have just as well invested in any of the more solid companies that were also undervalued, and perhaps doubled my money in a few months. Maybe AIB would not have been my first choice if I didn't already own some. Somehow it feels good though to have not lost any money in this one troubled company that everybody's losing money in, and still having a stake in it in case it recovers really nicely. I don't think market timing is all bad when you can make it work. One man's market timing is another man's value investing.

    It does leave me underwhelmed with the quality of GG's recommendations though. Talk about bad timing... and why is it investors have such an opaque view of what they're buying? AIB reportedly didn't have much exposure to the subprime mortgages back then, but later the truth came out.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2009, at 12:31 AM, investingcents wrote:

    Thanks for the candid post. I too have taken a huge loss on AIG. I was taken in by all the positive coverage I'd read without doing due diligence myself, so I have only my own naivete to thank for my losses. Anyway, I found your post insightful and a very welcome change from the often non committal commentary I see in similar articles here.

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2009, at 12:00 PM, rsinsheimer wrote:

    This article seems to be saying that with enough research we can always find the dirt and protect ourselves from bad equity purchases.

    This is not true. I doubt that even the insiders at AIB had a clue the cyclone that was about to blow apart their house, so how (realistically) could an outsider do sufficient research to have teased this out?

    I appreciate Adam's candor, but this is why we should never invest more than 4% of our losable assets in any single equity position. Being down 4% (if the company flops) is unfortunate and unpleasant, but survivable. Beating oneself up about it, or slipping into analysis paralysis because it happened, would be the wrong lesson to take away from this calamity.

    The correct lesson is that stuff happens, and you move on.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 920284, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 12:25:04 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Live Chat on India, China, and the Demise of the Dollar

Related Tickers

11/24/2009 11:57 AM
AA $12.82 Down -0.24 -1.84%
Alcoa, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
FRE $1.12 Down -0.04 -3.45%
Freddie Mac CAPS Rating: *
BRK-B $3414.00 Down -26.00 -0.76%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
DRYS $6.22 Up +0.03 +0.48%
DryShips, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
LEA $64.25 Up +0.25 +0.39%
LEAR Corp. CAPS Rating: No stars
SIRI $0.63 Down +0.00 -0.43%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
HIG $25.06 Down -0.28 -1.11%
Hartford Financial… CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Long-term asset: A long-term asset is one that is consumed or used over a number of accounting cycles, from more than one year to 40 years.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!