You Simply Can't Ignore These Stocks

Traditional investing logic tells us that, when the economy turns sour like it has, we ought to flock to undervalued large-cap stocks because they not only have better access to capital than smaller companies do, but they also attract the smartest and brightest business minds.

If the recent market implosion has taught us anything, though, it's that a poorly run large company can fall harder than a poorly run small company in an unforgiving market. In fact, some small companies have adjusted much better than their larger counterparts.

Castles made of sand
Certainly there's still some merit in the conventional approach -- one could do far worse than buying quality names such as Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) and Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) at current prices, as both of these blue chips have sterling balance sheets and continue to attract top talent.

Yet there was no shortage of talent wanting to get in the doors of Lehman Brothers, Wachovia, and Bear Stearns -- in fact, all three employers were among the 100 "most desirable" MBA employers in 2008, according to a Fortune survey. If traditional logic held true, this high-caliber talent should have been able to recognize the firms' problems and correct them more quickly than a smaller company. As we all know, that reasoning failed many investors.

In fact, it's been a number of smaller financial firms -- like Great Southern Bancorp, a Midwestern bank with $3.4 billion in assets -- that have proven to be nimbler than Goliath-sized competitors like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) and Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) . Well-positioned financial firms like Great Southern can capitalize on adverse market conditions by sweeping up other troubled companies' assets, as Great Southern did with Kansas-based TeamBank on March 20, 2009. Shares of Great Southern have more than doubled over the past year.

Titanic flops
But it's not just the financials -- consistently poor execution at iconic American businesses like Xerox and Eastman Kodak has sent both stocks down to single digits, with few signs of them returning to their former glory. These companies employ tens of thousands and had plenty of access to capital, but simply failed to perform well over the years.

Now compare those giant tales of woe to the success of PetMed Express, a $335 million pet drug prescription company that employs about 250 people. In May, the company reported revenue growth of 17% year over year, remained free-cash-flow positive, and kept long-term debt off its balance sheet. Because of this, the company was able to fund itself through its own operations and had no need to beg (pun intended) for loans. As you might imagine, investors rewarded PetMed even in this merciless market -- shares are nearly 10% over the past year, while the S&P 500 is down over 30%.

Bucking the dividend trend
Another reason investors traditionally turned to large caps in this type of environment was for their consistent and reliable dividends, but after 62 S&P 500 companies cut their payouts in 2008 -- followed by another 62 so far in 2009, including Macy's, Alcoa (NYSE: AA  ) , and Harley-Davidson (NYSE: HOG  ) -- it's clear (or more clear than usual) that no dividend is guaranteed.

Indeed, in a conference call after the dividend cut, Macy's Chief Executive Terry J. Lundgren said, "We just believe that this is a time when nothing should be considered a sacred cow."

It's discouraging to see so many blue-chip companies that have paid or raised dividends for decades suddenly changing course and blaming their mistakes on the macroeconomic picture, but there are still companies out there -- large and small -- staying true to shareholders with dividend increases in this market.

One of those companies is $1.4 billion clothing retailer Buckle, which in November 2008 -- despite operating in the same consumer spending environment as the aforementioned Macy's -- paid its shareholders a special one-time $3-per-share dividend and increased the quarterly dividend by 20%. Buckle is able to do this because it isn't burdened by debt (it has no long-term debt whatsoever), and it generates plenty of free cash flow, giving it plenty of room to raise dividends or reinvest in the business for the benefit of its shareholders.

Choose your weapons wisely
In a market where economic agility and strong management matter more than ever, make sure you're studying well-run small companies alongside larger companies. For my money, I want to own companies, regardless of size, that have a strong management team, have a rock-solid balance sheet, and dominate their market niche.

One of the companies I've been researching recently is Darling International, a $550 million company that fills a niche not many others want to fill: collecting food service waste (i.e., grease and discarded meat) and rendering or recycling the waste into usable by-products like animal feed, industrial oils, and even biofuel.

It's not only the largest company in this field (and the only one that's publicly traded), but it also has contractual relationships with big names like McDonald's and SUPERVALU (NYSE: SVU  ) grocery stores. It's a cyclical business to be sure, but Darling is free-cash-flow positive, has more cash than long-term debt, and has tenured management -- which means it's worth your time to research.

If you're looking for more small-cap ideas for this market, our Motley Fool Hidden Gems team can help. Among other things, they look for stocks that are:

  • Underfollowed on Wall Street.
  • Led by dedicated founders.
  • Financially strong.
  • Well-managed.
  • Dominant in their market niche.

A free 30-day trial of the Hidden Gems service is yours, so just click here to get started. There's no obligation to subscribe.

Already subscribed to Hidden Gems? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was originally published March 20, 2009, and has been updated.

Todd Wenning is an equal-opportunity investor. He does not own shares of any company mentioned. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value selection. The Fool's disclosure policy is as fast as greased lightning.

Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (12)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Francorp wrote:

    Microsoft is a winner. Get on this up to $30 per share

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 5:09 PM, jmontgomery86 wrote:

    I completely agree with Darling International. I recently bought up some shares and am very happy with it. It won't be too much longer until this gem gets spotted, especially with everyone going green and all that good stuff. They're also in the process of making a bio-diesel plant in San Francisco using recycled products and will hopefully be up and running in 2010 sometime.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 5:48 PM, bw1962 wrote:

    If you ignore the recent P.R. from Greenman Technologies, GMTI. You will live to lose money because of it!

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2009, at 8:59 PM, KalerSimth wrote:

    Certainly there's still some merit in the conventional approach -- one could do far worse than buying quality names such as Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) and Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL) at current prices, as both of these blue chips have sterling balance sheets and continue to attract top talent.

    If you guys ignore them, you may lose a check for $1,500.

  • Report this Comment On June 28, 2009, at 5:43 PM, greenwave3 wrote:

    Darling (DAR) is a big winner. Very strong niche business with excellent growth prospects.

  • Report this Comment On June 29, 2009, at 10:17 AM, kellogg9 wrote:

    I remember Xerox and their famous PARC where all those innovative inventions that we use today int eh computer field were first thought up but Xerox was too silly enough to not see their merits at the time and let other company's take and use them royalty free. Its stunts like that that has doomed Xerox to always be in single digits and lower permanently.


Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 929058, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2016 6:17:42 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,223.03 77.32 0.43%
S&P 500 2,151.33 10.17 0.47%
NASD 5,309.83 52.43 1.00%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/24/2016 4:00 PM
AA $26.86 Down -0.02 -0.07%
Alcoa CAPS Rating: ***
BAC $16.77 Up +0.10 +0.60%
Bank of America CAPS Rating: ****
C $49.58 Up +0.01 +0.02%
Citigroup CAPS Rating: ***
HOG $57.10 Up +0.73 +1.30%
Harley-Davidson CAPS Rating: ***
MSFT $61.00 Up +1.34 +2.25%
Microsoft CAPS Rating: ****
ORCL $38.27 Up +0.34 +0.90%
Oracle CAPS Rating: ****
SVU $4.47 Down -0.03 -0.67%
SuperValu CAPS Rating: **