Don't Touch These 3 Huge Value Traps

"Valuations are starting to get silly."

So said the chief investment officer at a major commercial bank during a recent call on the state of the economy. With the S&P 500 down 38% in 2008 -- and basically flat this year, despite the recent rally -- and investors treading cautiously after a scary past 18 months, some folks are wondering whether it's time to take advantage of incredible bargains.

So the urgent question is: Does buying beaten-down stocks actually lead to riches?

The shocking truth
To evaluate the merits of a contrarian approach to the market today, I recently ran a screen to discover how well a similar tactic would have worked during the last recession. I divided all 278 large-cap stocks into quintiles by performance over that period and looked at how well they did over the following five years.

Here's what I found:

Quintile

Performance, March-November 2001

Annualized Performance, November 2001-November 2006

1

 (51.3%)

6.1%

2

 (25.1%)

6.5%

3

 (13.4%)

9.1%

4

 (3.6%)

3.9%

5

 9.6%

9.2%

Total

 (16.9%)

7.1%

Data courtesy of Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.Stocks trading on major U.S. exchanges capitalized at more than $10 billion on March 1, 2001.

As you can see, stocks that had been scorched the most over that blistering eight-month period actually underperformed those that had done just fine -- by 3.1 percentage points annually!

How'd that happen?
Over those painful eight months, the market had correctly anticipated the value of many of these large companies and discounted them accordingly. A 50% haircut is certainly a markdown -- but not necessarily a sale, if the value of the company has been cut in half or was overvalued to begin with.

The savviest investors know that willy-nilly contrarianism isn't a sure path to riches. As the present financial disaster, which has affected not just overleveraged financial entities, but even stronger retail banks like Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) , illustrates, companies often get punished for all the right reasons. And in those cases, their plight can be as bad as you think -- and worse.

The envelope, please
Here are the names of three huge companies that are very likely to be value traps. All three have had massive declines in the past year, which make shares appear tempting to investors. However, they are also:

  • Heavily scrutinized large companies.
  • Returning among quintiles whose performance was anemic in the last recessionary go-around.
  • Rated with one or two stars (the lowest ratings possible) in our Motley Fool CAPS community.

Since we began tracking the collective intelligence of our CAPS investment community in November 2006, one- and two-star companies have fared poorly, with an average annualized loss of 11.4% and 5%, respectively.

Company

Prerecession Market Capitalization
(in billions)

Analyst Coverage

Recession Return

Citigroup (NYSE: C  )

$166

19

(91%)

Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL  )

$5.8

11

(71%)

UBS

$202

27

(74%)

Data from Motley Fool CAPS, Yahoo! Finance, and Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the present recession began Dec. 1, 2007.

Yes, shares of these companies have fallen dramatically, but that's because they've dealt with massive writedowns, deteriorating business units, ongoing cash burn, managerial missteps, CEO firings, and/or serious deleveraging in the face of an already ugly economic period.

Given the amount of attention these massive companies generate on Wall Street (as seen in that third column, "Analyst Coverage"), there's a strong chance that the sell-off was justified. If history is to repeat itself, thrashed large caps won't be the best stocks to buy now. If you want to profit from the recent marketwide sell-off, you need to look where others aren't looking.

A contrarian contrarian strategy
This time, I compared the postrecession returns of the aforementioned 278 large caps to the performance of all 1,740 small caps. I had expected some disparity in their five-year returns, but the sheer size was astounding:

Quintile

Small-Cap Performance, March-November 2001

Small-Cap Annualized Performance, November 2001-November 2006

Large-Cap Performance, March-November 2001

Large-Cap Annualized Performance, November 2001-November 2006

1

(53.8%)

23.7%

 (51.3%)

6.1%

2

(19.8%)

16.0%

 (25.1%)

6.5%

3

(1.4%)

14.5%

 (13.4%)

9.1%

4

14.7%

14.3%

 (3.6%)

3.9%

5

57.3%

13.7%

 9.6%

9.2%

Total

(0.7%)

16.7%

 (16.9%)

7.1%

Data courtesy of Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.Companies capitalized between $100 million and $2 billion versus those capitalized at more than $10 billion on March 1, 2001.

A small-cap contrarian approach following the last recession would have paid off handsomely, turning a $10,000 investment into nearly $30,000 in just five years. Not only did the most beaten-down small caps outperform their spared peers, but also, every quintile of small caps outperformed every quintile of large caps over the following five years.

And that last recession was no anomaly. According to T. Rowe Price, small caps have beaten large caps by nine percentage points on average over each of the past 10 recessions.

Among the most disappointing contrarian plays would have been buying $44 billion Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU  ) (then-Lucent Technologies) or $20 billion Juniper (Nasdaq: JNPR  ) back in November 2001, when they were "on sale" for more than 60% off -- because Alcatel-Lucent fell another 24% over the next five years, and Juniper's performance over that period wasn't exactly inspiring.

However $177 million VASCO Data Security (Nasdaq: VDSI  ) and $1.8 billion Akamai (Nasdaq: AKAM  ) , which had taken their own nasty tumbles, became eight- and 14-baggers over the next five years, respectively.

In fact, every single one of the top 10 stocks since the last recession was a small cap or a mid-cap. Among the very largest of those companies destined for greatness were then-$2.9 billion BlackBerry maker Research In Motion and $3 billion fertilizer producer PotashCorp.

Studies have shown that over the long haul, small caps outperform larger companies. According to research from professors Fama and French, small-cap value stocks outperformed their larger counterparts 13.6% to 10.9% on average from 1927 to 2008.

That's because small caps tend to be less closely watched by big brokerage houses and the financial media, so their stock prices are more likely to behave irrationally -- and provide huge opportunities during times of turmoil.

In other words, if you want to take full advantage of all the wonderful values in the market today, you need to look into small-cap stocks.

Small is good
At Motley Fool Hidden Gems, we look exclusively at companies capitalized at less than $2 billion, with little or no analyst coverage, that are led by dedicated managers/founders, and that have a wide market opportunity. It's here that you are going to find the companies that truly are undervalued.

So far, that strategy has paid off. Since inception in 2003, Hidden Gems picks are outperforming the S&P 500 by a wide margin.

To see our newest recommendations and top picks for new money now, click here to join Hidden Gems free for 30 days. There is no obligation to subscribe.

Already subscribe to Hidden Gems? Log in here.

This article was originally published Aug. 7, 2008. It has been updated.

Ilan Moscovitz doesn't own shares of any companies mentioned. Akamai is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. VASCO Data Security is a Stock Advisor pick. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 28, 2009, at 4:59 PM, mikeinmadrid wrote:

    I clicked through to this article from the Yahoo quote page on Akamai because I thought the article had something to do with Akamai. It doesn't.

    Please stop putting random ticker symbols in articles to get click-through. It doesn't make me want to buy any Fool services so stop it!!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 949344, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/28/2014 1:14:26 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement