Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.

Recs

40

One Bet You're Sure to Lose

Four minutes from now, you and I are going to make a bet -- and I can virtually guarantee you will lose.

But first I'm going to tell you something that may shock you, explain how it can lead you to the top 10 stocks of the next 365 days, and give you the names of two stocks our analysts are convinced will trounce the market over the coming year and beyond.

Up to the challenge?
Good. Let's start with a little warm-up exercise I do with anyone who asks me for a hot stock tip. Take the next minute or so to jot down a few stocks you think are among the top 10 stocks of the past 365 days.

Lately, most folks have been listing Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) or Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) based purely on the fact that BlackBerrys and iPhones continue to fly off the shelves -- but I'm confident you're much smarter than that.

If Ford (NYSE: F  ) , Schering-Plough (NYSE: SGP  ) , or NetEase.com (Nasdaq: NTES  ) made your list, you're on the right track. They were up anywhere between 35% and 63% over the past year -- yet none of them were even close to breaking the top 100 (you'll see why in a moment).

So, what did make the top 10? Let's have a look ...

Stock

52-Week Gain

Market Cap

HeartWare International

4,612%

$231 million

Vanda Pharmaceuticals

1,118%

$364 million

Diedrich Coffee

1,012%

$115 million

OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals

471%

$181 million

Dollar Thrifty Automotive

429%

$463 million

Kirkland's

384%

$263 million

China Green Agriculture

368%

$235 million

Dendreon

272%

$2.6 billion

Keryx Biopharmaceuticals

259%

$68 million

VocalTec Communications

242%

$9 million

Source: Google Finance.

Shocked?
Most people are. After all, these are companies most investors have never even heard of -- let alone seen on CNBC or read about in Fortune, Money, or Forbes.

Now, you might think this is some sort of anomaly caused by last year's near financial collapse, but it actually holds true year after year after year. That's because, as Motley Fool co-founder Tom Gardner points out, the next home run stock will almost always be:

  1. Small (market cap of less than $2 billion)
  2. Obscure
  3. Ignored

In fact, Tom Gardner launched our Motley Fool Hidden Gems small-cap stock service with one goal in mind -- to uncover well-managed, fast-growing, cash-generating businesses that are simply too small or too obscure for Wall Street analysts to cover.

Two Hidden Gems we're betting on now
Back in March, Tom handed $250,000 over to his two top small-cap analysts and tasked them with building a real-money, best-of-the-best small-cap portfolio.

Of the stocks Seth Jayson and Andy Cross have purchased so far (nine of 11 are in positive territory and three are up more than 50%), two that have particularly caught my eye are Dynamic Materials and Innophos.

Dynamic Materials is a dominant player in the highly specialized explosive metal-working industry. In fact, it's the biggest company of its kind in both North America and Europe -- and because this is a very hard industry to break into, it is highly unlikely major competitors will spring up anytime soon.

Meanwhile, Innophos makes specialty phosphates that are found in everything from sports drinks to toothpaste to asphalt. Like Dynamic Materials, it has relatively little competition. In fact, it controls as much as 40% of the $1.4 billion North American market.

Both companies have seen sales slow recently because of the economy, but are well-positioned to rocket upward once the recovery kicks into full gear.

The big payoff for you
Unlike household names Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) , these companies aren't followed by dozens of Wall Street analysts -- meaning there is a much greater chance investors are misjudging their true value.

And whereas it would take another $145 billion for Google shares to double, were either of these small companies to gain even a hundredth of that amount, their shares should soar as much as 450% and 650% respectively.

Granted, I can't guarantee that either of these companies will be among the 10 top stocks of the next 365 days, but I will bet you that not a single large-cap stock (over $5 billion) will make the list.

Want a piece of that action?
If, despite everything I've told you, you're still convinced a big, well-known company will make the list, I challenge you to use the comment function below to tell us its name, ticker, and why you think it will outperform all the rest over the coming year.

I'll run the numbers 365 days from now, and if your large-cap makes the list, I'll write another article telling everyone that you won the bet. In the meantime, I urge you to spend some time searching for well-run, cash-generating businesses that are too small to show up on Wall Street's radar.

If you'd like a little help, you can get full access to all of our Hidden Gems small-cap research and stock picks -- including our real-money small-cap portfolio -- by taking a free 30-day trial.

There is no cost, nor any obligation to subscribe. All you have to do is click here.

Already subscribe to Hidden Gems? Log in at the top of this page.

Austin Edwards owns shares of Apple and Google. Dynamic Materials and Innophos are Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendations. Apple is a Stock Advisor pick. Google and NetEase.com are Rule Breakers selections. China Green is a Global Gains choice. The Motley Fool owns shares of Dynamic Materials and Innophos. The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors, and has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (18) | Recommend This Article (40)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 12:48 PM, foolsdaytoday wrote:

    Ok.. so GOOG RIMM AAPL will not be winners!!! Hummm.

    What about the GMCR..YGII..LIFE..SIRI ?

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 12:57 PM, XMFTheNew wrote:

    My pick is SIRI... it's either complete bankruptcy or at least a 5 or 7 bagger by this time next year.

    I am long SIRI

    - TMFTheNew

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 1:25 PM, rustimpy2 wrote:

    Considering the market was at a very, very low point in March having anything in negative territory is just poor investing. Sorry just my thoughts

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 1:32 PM, TMFAEdwards wrote:

    Rustimpy...

    Good point.

    To clarify, the portfolio was opened at the end of March, and 11 positions have been opened/added to at various dates since then.

    The two positions that are down (1.5% and 5% respectively, as of today) were opened in mid-June, after the market had rebounded significantly.

    Sorry for the confusion, and thanks for reading.

    -- Austin

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 1:56 PM, ryan0train6 wrote:

    Considering you said stay clear of "big name" Ford a few months back..............I'll get market info somewhere else. Up %700 percent since March.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 2:35 PM, R0N0DUDE wrote:

    Oh, now you say ford was a good pick. That's not what you were saying for the past six months. You trashed ford. I guess your great at picking stocks when your"hind sight is 20-29). Let me tell you that you are part of the problem with this economy. You speak as an all knowning advisor, people listen to you but you only blow smoke. If people like you really spoke about stocks like ford months ago and about how they are really are not so bad. Because most of the drops in the market were panic sell offs. We would not have not have been so bad.

    But personally I'd like to thank you because I bought ford @ $1.38 and I am still holding on to it for a while because it's going up even more.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 3:46 PM, daxtastic wrote:

    Hmm, then why does Warren Buffet get rich off of large cap stocks? Because small, obscure, ignored stocks have small, obscure, and ignored business models that don't make money. They're desperate, take big gambles, and usually end up bankrupt. Every once in a while one will hit the jackpot and go up big. But if you're just wanting to gamble, then go play the lottery, where you can win millions for just a dollar invested, rather than a measley 1000% over a year. This ideology is truly gambling, and nothing even remotely reminiscent of investing. I'm disappointed in fool for even allowing this post.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 4:20 PM, jlemoo wrote:

    Hidden Gems recommended SCSS twice when it was trading at 20. Now it's at 2. I can do better on my own.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 4:41 PM, DownEscalator wrote:

    Daxtastic - that's completely false.

    Warren Buffet GOT rich investing in companies that were underfollowed and undervalued. Today, his only options are large-cap stocks (at least this is what he believes).

    Furthermore, Warren earned his wealth LONG-TERM, not by catching 300% gainers in one year.

    There are plenty of companies in the 100M-3B range that have consistent growth and solid models for profit. Indeed, Vanda, Diedrich, Dendrion, and HeartWare were more or less gambles, but take a look at companies like ALJ, APOG, GIFI, IMKTA, MVC, etc. None are crazy risky business models.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 6:31 PM, SeeknDestry wrote:

    BAC from March? Probably won't be at the very top, but trying to find dependable micro caps is like shooting for fish in a lake. I'd rather just use a barrel.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Pat999 wrote:

    Pretty much any financial from March.

    I agree with the general statement that more small caps will make the top of your list than large caps. But how'd you like to make another bet?

    Would you like to call which small caps will make the top 10? I challenge you to use the comment function below to tell us its name, ticker, and why you think it will outperform all the rest over the coming year. Can't? Then I win this bet.

    Is that even possible? Who here bought Heartware, Vanda or Diedrich at their 52 week lows? 'Cause seriously, Buffett wants to hire you. (or at least I do..)

    The point is, the article's premise that people can't name which large cap will make it on the list of top 10 52 week earners is sort of moot.

    But back to large caps: given that it was obvious that the bank stocks were crazy low in March and I had an ounce of optimism, I was buying up banks like my life (or at least my retirement) depended on it.

    On Caps, I rated BCS "outperform" (and bought shares) on March 12 at $3.80 (+510%). Go check, I'll wait...

    I own and will continue to buy small caps (HGSI at 2.70$, CT at 1.44$, MESA at 0.143$, SIRI at 0.12$,...)

    I read your clarification about how it wasn't all in March but only 3 out of 11 that are up over 50%?

    AIG went up 21% today just because the CEO said some stuff. (AIG up 140% this month). But then again, their market cap is STILL under 5B.

    So yea, AIG (NYSE:AIG) insanely low price, new CEO, made 4$ EPS Q2 '09, world hasn't ended (despite what CNBC would say) and will repay the feds (at their own pace). This will be over 150$ easy by July/August 2010 (7.50$ pre rs). I like owning stocks where even after a 21% one day gain, a 250% annual gain seems like a no-brainer. Especially ones that used to pay dividends.

    I know it's risky and I may be horribly wrong and glad i didn't bet the house. But either way I hope that Caps doesn't let me write an article about how Fool insiders picked the "best-of-the-best" small cap portfolio and only 3 out of 11 have 50%+ gains since the stock market's lowest point in over 50 years. It makes for a bad advertisement.

    Disclosure: I am holding AIG stock. (0.45$ pre rs and 13.09 post rs)

  • Report this Comment On August 21, 2009, at 12:55 AM, norcal313 wrote:

    One problem I'm seeing with a lot of posts is people are complaining about the recommended stock picks listed by certain analysts or articles on Fool.

    If you're simply taking the recommendations and going with them without doing your own research on the companies, shame on you.

    Use these articles and suggestions as a starting point. Many of the stocks talked about in Fool articles are great picks. If you don't check the financials and news releases available to everyone else on your own, then you're the one to blame.

    They're merely suggestions, they've saved me plenty of blind research hours on many of my green stocks.

  • Report this Comment On August 21, 2009, at 11:42 AM, KanuckSteph wrote:

    Hmm, author is recommending these small caps, yet bought Google and Apple. Motley Fool doesn't own them either. I enjoy reading the articles on this sight, and I do think that there is some useful advice...sometimes. Put your money where you mouth is, otherwise, you're no smart than anyone else. Just looking in the review mirrior of the fish that got away. Let's check these recommendations again in 52-weeks.

  • Report this Comment On August 21, 2009, at 12:20 PM, ozzfan1317 wrote:

    I agree that the big winners will be small caps however you have to do your own research dont just buy because someone reccommends it.

    www.newsecretsoftherich.com

  • Report this Comment On August 22, 2009, at 12:27 PM, 2humble2fool wrote:

    Great, now we all know that small caps are more volatile than large caps! I'm sure anyone with that knowledge is well on their way to being a multi-billionaire. Didn't this author write such a special article? Another worthless article promoting a newsletter.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2009, at 1:40 PM, TMFAEdwards wrote:

    To clear up a few points...

    1) Daxtastic... I have to agree with DownEscalator's reply regarding Buffett.

    In fact, in a 1999 Business Week article(http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/june1999/sw90625... he said...

    "If I was running $1 million today, or $10 million for that matter, I'd be fully invested. Anyone who says that size does not hurt investment performance is selling. The highest rates of return I've ever achieved were in the 1950s. I killed the Dow. You ought to see the numbers. But I was investing peanuts then. It's a huge structural advantage not to have a lot of money. I think I could make you 50% a year on $1 million. No, I know I could. I guarantee that."

    "The universe I can't play in [i.e., small companies] has become more attractive than the universe I can play in [that of large companies]. I have to look for elephants. It may be that the elephants are not as attractive as the mosquitoes. But that is the universe I must live in."

    Of course, I wasn't suggesting that you throw all your money into any old penny stock. I was merely pointing out that history has proved time and time again that the biggest gains going forward will almost always come from companies that most people (including the Wall Street analysts) aren't talking about right now -- which is why I believe it is well worth your time to research small caps, and why it's also a good idea to make them at least a part of your portfolio.

    2) It is a fair point that neither I, nor The Motley Fool, recommended or bought any of the top 10 stocks of the past 52 weeks.

    I wasn't trying to suggest that we had, simply that all 10 were in fact small-caps most investors had never heard of. This holds true again, and again, and again.

    For that reason, we have an entire group of analysts that cover (and are extremely passionate about) small caps exclusively.

    Among their picks are the two I mentioned... Innophos and Dynamic Materials -- and they aren't being recommended solely because they are small caps, but because our analysts believe them to be strong, well-managed, cash-generating businesses that will be able to grow significantly for years to come.

    3) To KanuckSteph's point... I personally do not own shares of Innophos or Dynamic Materials... but The Motley Fool DOES, as part of our real-money small-cap portfolio.

    And yes, I'm a shareholder of Google and Apple (both Motley Fool recommendations), and have seen modest gains in both. And while I believe in the long term prospects of both, I am fully aware I will never see the kind of gains in these stocks that I will by finding similarly strong companies that aren't slowed down by their mammoth market caps -- which is why I continue to devote a portion of my time and my portfolio to finding great companies that are small, obscure, and ignored.

    4) Finally, as communitity intelligence is one of the biggest strengths of our site, my hope for the article was that readers would chime in with some strong arguments for large caps they think will soar over the coming year. After all, there are plenty of large caps out there that are obscure and ignored, too.

    Thanks for reading, and if you have a large cap you think is going to have a bang up year, please chime in and let your fellow investors know...

    ae

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2009, at 4:19 PM, AtEaseInvesting wrote:

    The bet proposition is totally unfair !!

    The probability of the selected small cap stock gaining 100% in 365 days is about 50-50. The probability of the large cap stocks gaining 100% in 365 days is zero.

    However, the probability of the small cap stocks gaining 30% is also 50-50, but the large cap stocks gaining 30% in 365 days could easily be 80%.

    So if one's goal were not to double one's money in 365 days, but just to gain 30%, one would not buy the small cap stock.

  • Report this Comment On August 28, 2009, at 4:33 PM, relaxhaveabrew wrote:

    I'll loose this bet, but AMD

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 968190, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/23/2013 10:47:33 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 hour ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,294.50 -12.67 -0.08%
S&P 500 1,650.51 -4.84 -0.29%
NASD 3,459.42 -3.88 -0.11%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/23/2013 4:00 PM
NTES $61.53 Up +0.56 +0.92%
NetEase.com CAPS Rating: ****
SGP $28.15 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Schering-Plough Co… CAPS Rating: ****
VZ $51.89 Up +0.42 +0.82%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
GOOG $882.79 Down -6.63 -0.75%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $442.14 Up +0.79 +0.18%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
BBRY $14.43 Down -0.03 -0.21%
BlackBerry CAPS Rating: *
F $14.81 Down -0.16 -1.07%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement