It's Finally Time to Buy These Stocks

Recs

22

Stay away from small-cap bank stocks.

It was nearly two years ago now that Tim first dished out that advice. Though they looked cheap at the time, writedowns were happening across the industry, making financial institutions nearly impossible to value. On top of that, the economy was showing signs of sputtering with no resolution in sight.

Not much has changed
It's hard to believe, but the current economic downturn is two years old now -- and it's gone from bad to worse. Notwithstanding the recent rising tide in the market, stocks have gotten "cheaper," writedowns have gotten bigger, and the federal government is throwing Hail Mary passes in the hopes of averting further crisis.

And while big financials such as AIG, Fannie and Freddie, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) have dominated the headlines, smaller financials have been hit just as hard. In fact, Fifth Third Bancorp (Nasdaq: FITB) and First Horizon (NYSE: FHN) have lost 55% or more of their value since this crisis began in late 2007!

All of this is to say, it's still not time to start buying small-cap banks.

It may, however, be time to start looking hard at something a little off the beaten path: small-cap value.

What's the difference?
Small-cap value and small-cap banks often get conflated -- and for good reason. As Brian noted last year, the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR), like most small-cap value indexes, has substantial exposure to small banks. For the quarter ended June 30, small financial services companies accounted for 33% of VBR's holdings.

So while you don't want to buy small-cap banks, you do want to buy small-cap value net of banks because, as Mark Hulbert noted in a New York Times article at the end of 2008, these historical outperformers "produce their most explosive gains right at the start of a bull market."

Indeed, Russell Investments recently released a report suggesting that "they could emerge as the frontrunners if the economy stages a recovery." Year to date, small-cap value has outperformed the S&P 500 by five percentage points.

Let us be clear
Nonetheless, neither we nor Hulbert are predicting that we're at the start of a bull market. Rather, we're noting that:

  • Small-cap value generally outperforms.
  • Small-cap value outperforms by a particularly wide margin coming out of a bear market.
  • This has certainly been a bear market.

And thus: Now is a good time to start buying small-cap exposure for the long term.

After all, a little exposure to this market segment gives you the chance to take advantage of this historical trend and puts you in position for significant outperformance whenever this bear market turns for good.

What next?
Hulbert's recommended small-cap value investment vehicle, while low-cost, is imperfect, because he advised investors to "buy and hold an index fund benchmarked to the sector and to ride out the market's turbulence."

We see two main issues with that approach. First, as we mentioned previously, your run-of-the-mill small-cap value index has nearly one-third of its assets in financial companies -- a sector that has been and will continue to be rocked by government intervention, regulatory changes, and low interest rates.

Second, just as the SPDRs S&P-tracking fund is skewed toward the largest of companies, like $155 billion giant IBM (NYSE: IBM), small-cap value indexes are heavily weighted toward the larger likes of $4.7 billion Genworth Financial (NYSE: GNW) (another financial!), limiting the ability of smaller -- but perhaps better -- companies to have an effect on your returns.

Here's what we'd do
If you want to take advantage of this sector -- and we think you should -- then you ought to build your own diversified collection of superior small-cap value stocks that don't carry dangerous financial liabilities on their books.

That way, you can weight your portfolio toward high-quality businesses with entrepreneurial managers who treat their shareholders with respect rather than toward either small-cap banks or the small-cap value stocks with the largest market caps, as passive index funds will do.

If that sounds appealing and you'd like some stock ideas and additional guidance on how to unearth the best in small-cap value, join our Motley Fool Hidden Gems service, which recently started building a new real-money small-cap portfolio.

You can see the team's real-money picks and position your portfolio to ride those "explosive gains" in small-cap value. We offer a free 30-day trial without obligation to subscribe -- just click here to get onboard today.

Already subscribed to Hidden Gems? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was first published June 6, 2009. It has been updated.

Neither Tim Hanson nor Brian Richards owns shares of any companies mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy that has 19 minutes to spare before midnight.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 11, 2009, at 6:37 PM, chinaboy99 wrote:

    JoeDuggins

    That was an extremely well thought out and well written piece!!!!

  • Report this Comment On September 12, 2009, at 12:53 PM, plange01 wrote:

    the run in small cap stocks is ending and the move is toward larger companys that are still low as in boeing -ba,moodys-mco,yahoo -yhoo and ebay

  • Report this Comment On September 12, 2009, at 3:43 PM, PublicAccount wrote:

    FALLACY OF LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE SOLD BY GE NOW TWISTED INTO GENWORTH!

    SEC COMPLAINT NOW FILED 9/8/2009

    **************************************************

    To: Michael D. Fraizer, CEO and Buck Stinson, President of: Insurance Products,Patrick Kelleher, CFO, Pamela Schutz, Retirement Services, CEO, Leon Roday, VP/ General Counsel, Thomas Mann, VP Int'l-Key Executives, Genworth Financial

    c.c. Jeffrey R. Immelt, CEO, General Electric, et al- sent via GE Fax#203--373-3131

    Re:

    1- Actual negative experiences of claimants that originally purchased GE LTC that were in 2004, transferred to Genworth LTC and made claims both to GE and subsequently to Genworth on LTC unrelated claims

    2- A REVIEW of GE and Genworth documents, Master Agreement GE/Genworth, SEC Filings of GE and Genworth from 2003, thru 2009, Genworth Prospectus of 2004, expiring 2011

    3- US June 3, 2009- Special Committee on Aging Hearing, Buck Stinson's Transcription

    4- A Review of SEC Complaints filed against GE, etc.

    5- A Review of KPMG, Auditors for both Genworth and GE, KPMG's disclosures of "off-the- balance sheet" items

    6- Implications of FINRA, FCRA, SEC, etc

    In Re: Serious implications of the above, as it pertains to the above, etc, and reliance by LTC, etc., policyholders of GE that were removed from GE by GE and transferred by GE to be policyholders of Genworth, with and/or pending in 2010, without recourse to GE, etc

    Memo: Dear Key Executives of Genworth:

    AS referenced above, it has come to my attention, there exists numerous "inconsistencies" as well misconceived and misrepresented by GE and Genworth to LTC insureds and pending LTC applicants representations being made by Genworth's Key Executives and related literature of Genworth and Genworth's Sales and Servicing Agents!

    GE's collections of billions of dollars of LTC premiums from 1980 through 2003, and then removal of GE Policyholders to Genworth for LTC , Mortgage, Life, etc. insurances claims and coverage’s has caused serious concerns as to:

    1- GE culpability;

    2- Genworth's ability to pay on current and future claimants;

    3- While using premiums currently being paid for above insurance coverage’s to pay costs, damages;

    Colin Devine- Citigroup, Sept. 2, 2009- ".... (Genworth) Management continues to pursue a fundamentally flawed strategy........."

    4- KPMG's 10-K Filings clearly disclose Practices of Genworth and originally GE that jeopardize policyholders and stockholders!

    Genworth's requirements to require LTC claimants to pay the claimants' expenses of ADL- activities of daily living- while the claimant is disabled- and when and until Genworth deems that the claimant has in-detailed-facts- having to be investigated for many weeks, if not in-fact months- will Genworth then initiate reimbursements not direct payments!

    The entire essence of GE and now Genworth's promo is that the policyholders pay their premiums now and receive benefits and waiver of LTC premiums- often-time $5,000. Per year! By Genworth's purposeful delaying claimants their legitimate needs for LTC, the average claimant does not have money to pay such ADL expenses! Which then becomes the in-famous "Catch-22!" With no real money to pay for the claimants LTC, the claimants, if they have money-will pay until they seek Medicaid! Which is alluded to even in Buck Stinson's June 3, 2009 speech to the Senate!

    So the myth that Genworth will directly pay LTC is just a myth! The claimants have to pay, and "if" Genworth approves LTC coverages- in very copious forms- that only an accountant, or other professional could ever be able to complete! And, if Genworth denies coverage? An appeals period of 60+days goes into effect!

    William Hoffman, Baltimore, MD

    upsidebill@gmail.com

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2009, at 12:27 PM, UltraContrarian wrote:

    I agree with plange. Small cap value will do fine, but it depends how you define value. Eventually stocks with huge debt loads are going to see another serious correction.

    There is nothing in the article to support the claim that small banks are not worth buying. You don't even mention a single small bank. I don't own any, but there are probably a lot of bargains right now in OTC banks. The problem is, a lot of them don't have to submit statements to the SEC so they are difficult to sort through.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 982798, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 8:48:51 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Public Health-Care Plan's Problem

Related Tickers

11/30/2009 4:00 PM
WFC $28.04 Up +0.90 +3.32%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ***
GNW $10.77 Up +0.09 +0.84%
Genworth Financial… CAPS Rating: ***
IBM $126.35 Up +0.65 +0.52%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ****
FITB $10.08 Up +0.51 +5.33%
Fifth Third Bancor… CAPS Rating: **
JPM $42.49 Up +1.16 +2.81%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
FHN $13.55 Up +0.33 +2.50%
First Horizon Nati… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Immediate or cancel: Immediate or Cancel (IOC) is a condition a trader or investor can include in his/her purchase or sale of a stock

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!