Cashing In on Obamacare

Recs

4

I know, I know. Obamacare is the worst idea since the Spice Girls reunion tour. It will stifle competition and kill capitalism. It will bankrupt the country and have us eating cat food in retirement. We'll all have to submit our DNA to the presidential death panel, plus a 1,000-word essay on "What I would like to do next summer," in order to decide who gets an insulin prescription and who gets a sympathy card. Hey, did I mention the entire country's going commie?

Oh, I'm sorry. My mistake. You're a fan of Obamacare? Then rest assured, I understand your enthusiasm for the subject. Wringing costs out of the health-care system is vital. Clearly, the only way to do that is a government-run reform program. Government being known for its efficiency and lean operations, a pillar of the reform must be a public insurance option. This is the only way to shake the existing health-care establishment out of its complacency. If that means fewer ivory backscratchers for those Wall Street fat cats (who, by the way, have more money than you do -- I'm just sayin'), then so be it. Also, did I mention those fat cats are rich?

Step away from the talk radio
Sorry if that sounded flip, but frankly, I'm amazed at the vitriol that's been whipped up on both sides of this debate. And I'm tired of being amazed. I acknowledge that this is an important debate for our country, but I'm not spending any more energy getting worked up about it. The misinformation spouted by health-care reform's detractors (i.e., "death panels!") and proponents (i.e., "record profits at insurance companies!") is too pervasive to amaze me any longer.

Besides, I think there's a better way for us investor types to spend our limited energy on Obamacare: We should be figuring out how to make a buck in health-care stocks.

The unloved sector
Some of you are no doubt thinking, "Make money in health care? This guy had better hope Obama includes major psychological benefits in his plan." But if so, you might have said the same thing back in May, when we purchased shares of Atheros Communications for our real-money portfolio at Motley Fool Hidden Gems. At the time, any recovery was doubted, the mini-rally suspected, and most were convinced that consumers and businesses certainly wouldn't be buying computers, gadgets, and networking gear (where Atheros butters its corporate toast).

Atheros returned some 78% from that point, about 56 percentage points better than the broader market, because what everyone "knew" and feared doesn't appear to be playing out. Sure, we have a weak recovery, if we have one at all, but we've stopped accelerating downhill. As the dive in chip sales flattened, the stock reacted accordingly.

Same story, different sector
In August, I was asked to talk Google and tech stocks on CNBC's "Closing Bell," because tech stocks were the new cool thing again, I guess. As one member of the parade of bland men in suits, I was hoping to distinguish myself  at least somewhat  from the crowd by refusing to play the hot sector game.

In fact, as I explained to "Money Honey" Maria Bartiromo, the concept of the "hot sector" makes me uneasy. By the time a sector has attracted attention, many of the stocks in it have risen, some nonsensically, and bargains are harder to find. Enthusiasm for what's already popular might get you face time on CNBC, but it's likely to put your portfolio on long-term life support. I told Bartiromo we'd been buying tech back in May, before it got hot. (I don't know if my impertinence will get me a return engagement. But Foolishness is more important than popularity.)

As Buffett has put it, you pay a high price for a cheery consensus. Luckily, the converse is also true. You get a bargain price for fear and loathing. That's why, to the extent that a "trees-not-forest" investor like me is interested in sectors at all, I'm much more interested in groups of companies that are feared or openly reviled. And right now, I'm having a hard time thinking of any sector as maligned as health care.

Among the small-cap sector ETFs below, health-care returns have been near the bottom of the pile for sector returns over the past year, with only a lackluster comeback thereafter -- roughly equal to the wider small-cap index's return over the past six months.

Sector

1 Week

1 Month

6 Months

1 Year

Telecomm

(0.8%)

(6.8%)

(16%)

(45%)

Financials

1.4%

(4.6%)

11%

(13%)

Utilities

(1%)

(3.2%)

11%

(7%)

Health Care

0.6%

(2.4%)

23%

14%

Industrials

(0.3%)

(3%)

22%

15%

Russell 2000 ETF

0.2%

(4.9%)

23%

18%

Consumer Staples

(1%)

(3.7%)

17%

28%

Materials

(0.3%)

(5.2%)

37%

34%

Energy

1%

(0.3%)

45%

34%

Tech

0.4%

(6.7%)

29%

37%

Consumer Discretionary

(0.8%)

(7.9%)

26%

48%

However, that bottom-of-the-heap index-ETF return looks positively excellent compared to the results from some of the losers in this space. As you can see, health care can be a tough sector, even if you exclude the drops in uber-volatile drug and biotech stocks. The last six months have provided a sickening ride for the holders of these companies, even while the broader market has surged ahead:

Company

% Price Change

Aspyra (AMEX: APY)

(43.8)

PhotoMedex, (Nasdaq: PHMD)

(46.3)

TLC Vision (Nasdaq: TLCV)

(47.4)

On the other hand, there have been some major winners in the space, some of which were losers not too long ago:

Company Name

% Price Change (6 Months)

Speedus (Nasdaq: SPDE)

994.4

STAAR Surgical Company (Nasdaq: STAA)

259.2

PositiveID (Nasdaq: CHIP)

194.6

Foolish final thought
Figuring out what to buy, and when, is always the difficulty in investing. But I think you get a head start if you look where others aren't looking, or where they're so busy screaming that they're not thinking. I think one of the ways you can beat Mr. Market is by looking in hated sectors for great companies, and buying the babies, so to speak, while they're being tossed aside with the bathwater. Given the angst and rancor of the health-care debate, I think you ought to devote a portion of your stock research to this sector.

At Motley Fool Hidden Gems, where we focus on small-cap companies that we believe have the potential to become large winners, we're even putting our money where my mouth is. My team has doubled down on its work in the health-care sector. We recently bought cash-flow stalwart IMS Health (NYSE: RX), which received a buyout offer only weeks later, giving us a quick 40% gain in only two months. Things don't always work out that quickly, but we're convinced that when you concentrate on good companies in misunderstood or maligned sectors, you make your own good luck. If you'd like to see where we hope to profit from Obamacare, along with our special video valuations, our weekly video stock updates, and our in-depth portfolio and watchlist reports (updated twice monthly) a risk-free trial is just a click away.

Seth Jayson is co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems. Atheros and IMS Health are Hidden Gems recommendations. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. The Motley Fool owns shares of Atheros and IMS Health. The Fool has a healthy disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Radiance08 wrote:

    While I agree that healthcare costs do need to be lowered, the way to go is not with another government entitlement program which will raise taxes and raise the cost of healthcare for all of us.

    The government has not done anything efficiently:

    Medicare and Medicare are going broke and full of fraud

    Social Security is going broke and full of red tape.

    The government will not solve the problem and will make it much worse.

    However I do agree with looking at health care stocks.

  • Report this Comment On November 21, 2009, at 3:23 PM, AriasPalm wrote:

    The key vulnerability in Obama's healthcare plan is the financial burden it will impose on young people and their families. It threatens them with jail if they do not either get high cost health insurance (averaging $15,000 per family in premiums) or pay a fine of 2.5 percent of their income to the government. Social security is broke, medicare is broke and the baby boomers are retiring so what to do? Invent a new government health care program that will get the money from the young. But tell them it will be free or "deficit neutral."

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1042976, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2010 10:07:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is This Bull Over?

By The Motley Fool

Is This Bull Over?

Related Tickers

12/24/2009 1:00 PM
TLCV $0.08 Down +0.00 +0.00%
TLC Vision Corp (U… CAPS Rating: *****
RX $21.87 Down +0.00 +0.00%
IMS Health, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
PHMD $1.79 Down +0.00 +0.00%
PHOTOMEDEX, INC. CAPS Rating: No stars
APY $0.15 Down +0.00 +0.00%
ASPYRA, INC CAPS Rating: No stars
STAA $3.68 Down -0.12 -3.16%
STAAR Surgical Com… CAPS Rating: *****
CHIP $1.71 Down +0.00 +0.00%
VeriChip Corp CAPS Rating: No stars
SPDE $2.57 Down +0.00 +0.00%
SPEEDUS CORP. CAPS Rating: No stars