Recs

5

3 Bargain Stocks for This Market

In "70 Times Better Than the Next Microsoft," my colleague Bill Barker revealed which category of stocks outperformed from 1927 to 2005. Given the insane market volatility we've experienced recently, I've updated Bill's numbers through the end of 2008 to see what critical lessons we can draw. Here, then, are the returns for four categories of stocks from 1927-2008:

Category

Value

Growth

Large Cap

10.9%

8.9%

Small Cap

13.6%

9.0%

Source: Kenneth French. Categories are based on market capitalizations and price-to-book multiples.

This data comes from highly respected scholars Fama and French, and it has powerful implications for investors.

It shows that over an 81-year period -- hardly a small sample size -- value stocks outperform growth stocks, and small stocks outperform large stocks. The best-performing category was small-cap value stocks, by a wide margin.

How wide?
They may look like small percentage differences, but with compounding, those small percentages add up to mind-boggling amounts of money. Here's how much $100 invested in 1927 in each of these categories, and rebalanced annually, would be worth today:

Category

Value

Growth

Large Cap

$437,860

$97,682

Small Cap

$3,086,003

$103,798

In other words, after 81 years, investing in small-cap value stocks would have yielded anywhere from seven to 31 times as much money as any of the other categories!

A big reason for small-cap value's dramatic outperformance is Wall Street's constant obsession with large, prominent firms -- like eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  ) and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) . When hunting for bargains, investors should keep in mind that more prominent stocks such as these are far less likely to be mispriced than small caps like MercadoLibre (Nasdaq: MELI  ) .

It's no accident, after all, that every one of the market's 10 best-performing stocks of the past decade was a small cap.

And when you combine a group of stocks that tends to be mispriced (small caps) with a group of stocks trading at low valuations (value), you're likely to find some great bargains.

Here's why
When a closely watched company appears cheap, there's often a good reason for it. That's why in a September column, "Don't Touch These 3 Huge Value Traps," I warned investors to stay away from Capital One (NYSE: COF  ) , Lehman Brothers, and Merrill Lynch.

Even though they were trading at or well below book value, these were closely followed institutions, dealing with continuing writedowns, managerial missteps, and deteriorating businesses. With so much interest in their condition from Wall Street hotshots -- each had more than 15 analysts following it -- it seemed likely that their share price declines were justified.

That may not be the case for small caps. In fact, research cited in The Wall Street Journal, along with my own findings, shows that small caps tend to outperform when the market rebounds. In fact, the top performers since the market's March lows were largely small caps.

Why? Because small value stocks are less closely followed by professionals, they are more likely to be mispriced. So when times are tough -- and times have been tough since late 2007 -- that mispricing means that small caps are punished beyond justification.

What to look for today
This isn't to say that small stocks are low-risk. Indeed, if this market has taught us anything, it's that every stock has risk. But the data does indicate that size itself isn't a great measure of safety.

From the start of this recession until the March market bottom, the small-cap tracking Russell 2000 index was basically in line with the S&P 500, and it has rebounded more rapidly.

And when we examine fallen giants such as Citigroup, Ambac Financial (NYSE: ABK  ) , Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) , and the assets formerly known as Lehman Brothers, we see that risk has less to do with whether a company is large or small, and a whole lot more to do with heavy debt levels, shoddy executive compensation structures, unwieldy and arcane business units, or unprofitability.

In light of these facts, investors should consider buying companies with:

  • Little or no debt
  • Heavy insider ownership
  • High profitability

In fact, these are all qualities that Warren Buffett says he seeks. So, taking the lessons from the Fama and French data, and with a debt of gratitude to Buffett, I've selected three small-cap value stocks (each has below-market-average price-to-book value multiples -- Fama and French's value metric) that share those qualities:

Company

Market Capitalization

Price-to-Book Ratio

Debt / Equity

Insider Ownership

Return on Equity

Enstar Group (Nasdaq: ESGR  )

$867 million

1.26

46%

42%

27%

Genesee & Wyoming

$1,224 million

1.86

70%

8%

12%

EZCORP

$860 million

2.00

7%

7%

20%

Data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Of course, these three bargain stocks aren't necessarily official recommendations, but they share many qualities that make for great investments, and they're excellent starting points for further research. Moreover, they hail from the small-cap value quadrant, the category that has outperformed them all.

Some more ideas
More than eight decades of historical data confirms that small-cap value stocks tend to outperform over the long haul. Research also shows that if you're going to be looking for great small-cap stocks, now is a particularly great time to begin bargain-hunting.

Our Motley Fool Hidden Gems team looks exclusively at small caps with limited analyst coverage, little or no debt, and dedicated leadership. With stocks so cheap, they're seeing some incredible bargains today. If you're looking for more ideas, click here to read all about our favorite small-cap stocks, free for the next 30 days.

Already a member of Hidden Gems? Log in here.

This article was first published May 5, 2009. It has been updated.

Ilan Moscovitz owns shares of Google, which, along with MercadoLibre is a Rule Breakers selection. Enstar Group is a Global Gains pick. Genesee is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendation. eBay is a Stock Advisor pick. Motley Fool Options recommended a bull call spread on eBay. The Fool's disclosure policy is crazy for Pounce!


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 27, 2010, at 6:27 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    I notice that when you cite Las Vegas Sands as a "fallen giant" along with Ambac and Citigroup, you fail to draw a distinction between which of those companies were bailed out, and which one (Sands) succeeded financially, all on it's own.

    You people at Motley Fool keep grouping Sands with companies that are bad comparisons... like when you consistently group it with American casino companies when 3/4 of it's revenues come from China.

    So when you go on to talk about these virtues:

    1. Little or no debt

    2. Heavy insider ownership

    3. High profitability

    .... I would point out that Las Vegas Sands has a higher EBITDA in Macau than all other Macau gaming licensees combined. I would point out that one insider, CEO Sheldon Adelson, owns a true majority of Sands shares.

    Finally, I'd point out that, although Sands is highly leveraged, it's recent IPO and debt covenant revisions have the "direction" of it's indebtedness moving in a positive direction... which is important in a global economy that has bottomed and started to improve.

    I can see why Motley Fool mis-characterizes Sands... because it is M.F. policy to bash Sands. The problem is, it damages your credibility, and it compels me to read other columnists ahead of yours.

    Spokanimal

  • Report this Comment On January 27, 2010, at 6:42 PM, TMFDiogenes wrote:

    Hey spokanimal,

    Good points. Their debt was the major problem, but LVS does have heavy insider ownership and was very profitable.

    There's no TMF policy to bash LVS or any other companies.

    Thanks for posting,

    Ilan

  • Report this Comment On January 27, 2010, at 9:12 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    llan,

    I appreciate your reply. I'll keep an eye out for a more balanced perspective on LVS.

    One idea for you, and for your readers...

    Regarding a company's leverage, I have found over the decades that during times of uncertainty and deteriorating economies, that high debt loads are dangerous.

    The flip side is that during times of economic improvement (there is currently a global, economic recovery), debt can be a good source of wealth building, but it's good to diversify one's holdings pursuant to that.

    If you'd like to pursue the 2 faces of leverage relative to the economic cycle to a greater extent, check into the writings of Tom Soviero, manager of an extraordinary fund known as the "leveraged company stock fund". It will change your thinking about whether or not leverage is something that should always be screened away from.

    Spok

  • Report this Comment On January 27, 2010, at 9:24 PM, theyounggun303 wrote:

    While TMF can not admit that it has a policy to bash any company, it has an apparent policy to bash LVS. If you screen out the articles on LVS for the last year published on TMF, you will agree with me. It seems to me that the editors at TMF failed repeatedly to examine the DD's of LVS before publishing the bashing articles. It surely makes one wonder if TMF actually has an agenda to bash LVS for profit.

    theyounggun303

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1095267, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 7:36:11 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
GOOG $591.53 Down -12.13 -2.01%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
LVS $47.92 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Las Vegas Sands Co… CAPS Rating: ***
MELI $74.73 Down +0.00 +0.00%
MercadoLibre CAPS Rating: ****
COF $51.13 Down -0.59 -1.14%
Capital One Financ… CAPS Rating: **
EBAY $40.35 Up +0.68 +1.71%
eBay CAPS Rating: ****
ESGR $93.24 Down -0.22 -0.24%
Enstar Group CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement