Recs

17

Why I'm Not Buying These Stocks

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

This article is part of our Rising Star Portfolios series.

It took me awhile to finally settle on the first small cap for my Rising Star multivitamin portfolio. But that's how it works in real life, right? You have things to do in addition to researching stocks including, occasionally, getting some sleep.

Here's the progression for those of you just tuning in:

Timing is nothing
If you'd bought the day my article came out, you'd be pretty happy because lululemon popped up 9% the next day when management raised guidance. Unfortunately for me, all portfolio purchases are carried out the day after the article is published, so I got in around $73 rather than $67. Oh well, that's also how it works in real life. And true to our Foolish teachings, I'm not going to get too upset by it. (Darn it.)

Not gonna buy 'em
I promised to explain why my other four candidates failed to make the cut. They were all interesting and had their strengths and may perform well in the future, but here's a quick look at why there weren't right for me at this time.

MercadoLibre (Nasdaq: MELI  ) -- In my opinion, this stock is priced for perfection even if all were actually well with the business. But while I know MercadoLibre has a stranglehold on online commerce in Latin America, I'm worried about eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  ) and other competitors squeezing its growth opportunities elsewhere. It's also very hard to come up with a true growth estimate for MercadoLibre. Foolish colleague Matthew Argersinger has done some extensive analysis for the Big Short service and points out that all the earnings growth from last quarter came from nonoperational sources like expense reductions and foreign currency gains. Add in a troubling rise in accounts receivable -- which could indicate some difficulty in collecting bills -- and I decided to pass.

Ebix (Nasdaq: EBIX  ) -- I like Ebix and may revisit it at a later time. But I shelved the idea this time around in order to dig deeper and figure a couple of things out. First, its valuation seems too good to be true. An earnings multiple of 18 with 50% growth rates, outstanding margins, and 33% return on equity? Why isn't the market rewarding the stock with a higher valuation? It might be because management acquires companies faster than Zsa Zsa Gabor does husbands. This makes it tough to understand the accounting. There's also the problem of one auditor citing "deficiencies" in Ebix's internal controls.

Puda Coal (Nasdaq: PUDA  ) -- Similar to Ebix, Puda's risks outweighed its low valuation. This $279 million small fry is located in China's Shanxi province, and its auditor was recently fined by the Securities and Exchange Commission for "improper professional conduct in connection with annual audits and quarterly reviews of the financial statements" of another Chinese company, China Energy Savings Technology. Realizing it will take me a long time to understand the risks here, I shelved Puda for now.

ZAGG (Nasdaq: ZAGG  ) -- ZAGG carried a market cap of about $160 million when it passed the Foolish 8 screen, by rule too small for me to add to my Rising Star portfolio (minimum: $200 million). I didn't really get a chance to dig into the business, and the stock is now up more than 30% in just the past three weeks. Oh, well.

Am I wrong to have passed on these companies? Let me know in the comments below, or join us on my Rising Star discussion board.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool analyst Rex Moore reminds you to keep your arms and legs inside the article at all times. Of the companies mentioned here, he owns shares of eBay. MercadoLibre is a Motley Fool Big Short short-sale recommendation. Ebix, lululemon athletica, and MercadoLibre are Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendations. Motley Fool Alpha has opened a short position on MercadoLibre. Motley Fool Options has recommended a bull call spread position on eBay, which is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool owns shares of Ebix and lululemon athletica. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 19, 2011, at 2:01 PM, lewellen180 wrote:

    Arguably, investing is an exercise in probability theory. As such, the process that you use to decide how and when to buy, hold and sell is what makes (or loses) you money in the long run.

    If your process is solid, you understand it, and you're comfortable using it, then you weren't wrong in passing on these companies ... regardless of the short-term outcome.

  • Report this Comment On January 19, 2011, at 7:35 PM, daheat43 wrote:

    ZAGG has a commodity product that they're working to brand. So far, the company is basically a one trick pony, and efforts to diversify have so far failed. Their new Zaggmate case may prove a success, but that too is in a crowded industry.

    Some folks thing ZAGG will rise with iPhone sales, but that seems overly simplistic. First, ZAGG makes accessories for a lot of phones, not just the iphone, so their profits won't rise perfectly with iphone sales. Second, their cash flow and cash position are not that great. Third, some folks have been slinging mud at the company's management for potential shenanigans... high inventory, etc.

    Short interest is above 20% now, and days to cover is higher than it's been in a year. Yet the stock has absolutely zealous defenders. I'd love to hear a Foolish opinion on this stock, since I'm pretty baffled by it.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2011, at 9:25 AM, willphule wrote:

    Rex, where do you find mention of the auditors' claim of "deficiencies" with Ebix's internal controls? I have looked through the most recent 10K and found no mention of this. Thanks in advance.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2011, at 11:02 AM, TMFOrangeblood wrote:

    Hi willphule,

    I got that from a write-up in our Big Short service:

    "Changes in auditors or key members of the management team, such as the chief financial officer, should always be viewed with a skeptical eye. In the case of Ebix, what's most concerning is the change from a major auditor in KPMG to lesser firms in the space — and the company has had several auditors in recent years. KPMG resigned as auditor (always a red flag) and the firm BDO Siedman expressed concerns about "deficiencies" in Ebix's internal controls. As a result, Ebix's financial performance should be viewed in a questionable light."

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2011, at 12:40 PM, willphule wrote:

    Rex, thanks for responding.

    KPMG resigned in June of 2004. BDO's comments were based on the FY ending 2004 and remained in the filings, regarding that period, for the balance of the 2005 filings as required. It appears that a lot of the concern was related to the foreign acquisitions as one might expect.

    There was no subsequent mention of any further, or other, deficiencies made by BDO during the remainder of their time as Ebix's auditors.

    Their current auditors Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P are a top 30 firm and as of the last audited filing dated March 16, 2010 have expressed "an unqualified opinion thereon" regarding the company's internal controls.

    Anyway, it is nice to have a little a more of their history under my belt.

    As an aside, why do authors not site references directly in articles anymore? This is so widespread in the financial 'reporting/blogging' industry. I would think the Fool would take the lead in this area as they have always encouraged investors to do their own research. Just my two cents.

    Thanks for the article and the timely response, both are appreciated!

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2011, at 2:30 PM, TMFOrangeblood wrote:

    Glad to help, willphule.

    It's an interesting question about sources. I think the problem with financial articles is the sheer amount of sources that would be have to be mentioned, and the fact that most things can be found on the Internet if someone wants more information. (I Googled ""deficiencies" in Ebix's internal controls" and the first non-Fool hit was an Ebix 10-q: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:6YAjH41....

    By the way, every story written for Fool.com is heavily sourced, and it's all checked by a financial editor for accuracy (who then removes the sourcing and annotation, obviously). The article then goes through a copyeditor as well. Not that that helps you find facts on your own, but it does show that most things you read here will be accurate, with only the occasional error.

  • Report this Comment On January 24, 2011, at 12:24 PM, ozzfan1317 wrote:

    Although some of questions with the auditors are concerning. Most of this is now several years removed you have a well run company that has carved out a nice profitable niche in a sector it is quickly taking share. I am loading up the truck as I have closely studied Mr Raina and am greatly impressed by him as well.

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2011, at 4:08 PM, j1c200 wrote:

    I didn't do all the or any of the research I should have, but I'm pretty happy with the 5k shares that I bought at two and a nickel... :-)

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2011, at 4:12 PM, j1c200 wrote:

    I just happen to like the product and it is protecting my kids, grandkids, and my Iphones, Logitech/Harmony tv remotes, e-reader, Ipads, and Ipods..... Liking a product has to count for something......

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2011, at 9:48 PM, valuehunter007 wrote:

    I added ZAGG in my watch list on 10/04. It went up all the way to 10.56 and currently at just over 9. Ah, I wish I added it in my portfolio. Wouldn't hurt to get 100% return in 3 months! :o

    While I myself don't like to buy a stock that has had a decent run already, it's not necessarily a bad pick just based on its current appreciation as long as it continues to grow fast. I added IDCC in my portfolio on 10/21 at around $30 where it already had 30% upside run within 1 month! I was worried if I am picking it too late. Well, IDCC currently trades at another 60% up at around $48 and going strong!

    My belief is, if you are buying stock for its growth, look for growth characteristics and other fundamentals such as cash flow, margin etc and do not look a lot into price appreciation.

    valuehunter007

  • Report this Comment On February 03, 2011, at 6:15 PM, StockMillionare wrote:

    Zagg's not done. It's just starting to catch on, only 8 percent institutional ownership, a lot of room to run yet.

  • Report this Comment On March 28, 2011, at 3:33 PM, mikeinmadrid wrote:

    EBIX p/e needs adjusting for a normalized tax rate. Growth rates need adjusting for share dilution. However, it still isn't that expensive. Analysts just don't expect high growth rates going forward (they didn't last year either)

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1425121, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 4:43:39 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
MELI $74.73 Down +0.00 +0.00%
MercadoLibre CAPS Rating: ****
ZAGG $12.00 Down -0.01 -0.08%
ZAGG Incorporated CAPS Rating: *
LULU $72.06 Down -0.61 -0.84%
Lululemon Athletic… CAPS Rating: **
EBAY $40.35 Up +0.68 +1.71%
eBay CAPS Rating: ****
EBIX $17.93 Down -0.04 -0.22%
Ebix CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement