Fashion Risk at Wal-Mart?

Recs

0

It's hard to build a good business, even harder to keep it growing, and harder still to occupy the top spot and not lose track of the values and virtues that built your empire. Such might be the challenge for Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) today. The biggest threat isn't some ethics-driven customer backlash (you'll notice that Wal-Mart's parking lots remain full), but rather losing touch with what first brought those customers to the stores in droves.

The megaretailer's fourth quarter was hardly disappointing. Sales were up almost 9% companywide, and comp-store sales increased 3.1%. Margins improved yet again, and operating income rose just under 11% for the quarter.

Sam's Club was the laggard in both sales and segment income growth, but it still grew. The domestic Wal-Mart business seems to be getting a solid boost from the superstore concept (and good comp numbers for food sales), and the international business is growing at a double-digit clip.

What might worry me a bit if I were a long-term holder, though, is the company's recent decision to go upmarket with some of its fashions. I mean, who among us has ever really thought of Wal-Mart as fashionable? Isn't that really supposed to be Target's (NYSE: TGT) niche? Its cheap-but-still-stylish clothing and housewares have earned it the French-sounding "Tar-jhay" nickname.

In my opinion, the risk here isn't that Wal-Mart will alienate its customers, but that it'll snarl what is presently a top-notch distribution system. If their new fashions don't sell, they'll gum up the works with excess inventory, chewing into inventory turns, working capital, and so on.

Wal-Mart's stock looks value-priced, but I still have some qualms about the company. It's so large that's it's basically a play on overall consumer spending, and the company still has a ways to go before it matches Carrefour internationally. I'm not too worried about the ever-present headline risk here, but I do wonder what kind of market-beating returns can be made from a company that is already so large.

For more related Foolishness:

Fool contributor Stephen Simpson has no financial interest in any stocks mentioned (that means he's neither long nor short the shares).

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 511766, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 12:50:38 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 12:12 PM
TGT $47.33 Up +0.55 +1.18%
Target Corp CAPS Rating: ***
WMT $54.56 Down -0.19 -0.35%
Wal-Mart Stores, I… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Earnings Power Value: Earnings Power Value (EPV) is a valuation tool that was popularized by Bruce Greenwald, et al, in the book Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!