Larry Ellison Doesn't Dig the Net

Recs

5

During last week's fiscal first-quarter earnings call, Oracle's  (Nasdaq: ORCL) candid CEO Larry Ellison talked smack about rivals. IBM (NYSE: IBM), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), and BEA Systems (Nasdaq: BEAS) all drew Ellison's ire. But he seemed to take the most pleasure in skewering SAP's (NYSE: SAP) new web-based platform, Business ByDesign. While none of this should surprise Fools, Ellison went even further, opining that the industrywide shift to web-based business software has been a bust.

Ellison claims that SAP's strategy to go after smaller customers is interesting, "but so far no one has figured out how to make any money at it." He points to Salesforce.com (NYSE: CRM), which he calls the best software company in the space, as an example of a money loser.

Ellison may need to check his math. In fiscal Q2, Salesforce.com reported GAAP earnings of $0.03 per share.

In addition, on Oracle's conference call, executives also discussed the company's CRM On Demand, which is web-based. Charles Phillips, Oracle's president, said there were some "key wins" for the offering. So how come Ellison's down on the whole endeavor?

Dig deep enough, and you begin to see the method to Ellison's apparent madness. First, he doesn't like competition, and he believes that buying rivals can be a good way to deal with it. Second, he wants to focus on large customers that are willing to write big checks for reliable solutions. So why charge lower subscription fees and reduce overall revenues?

On-demand software may present opportunities in small and mid-sized markets. But such an effort would probably be a distraction for Oracle, requiring new infrastructure investments. What's more, the company's previous forays into those markets have been lackluster.

Based on the results so far, it's hard to argue with Ellison's disinterest in shifting Oracle toward on-demand offerings. In the latest quarter, the company increased its license revenue by a hefty 35%, to $1.1 billion. Oracle also enjoyed a nice improvement in operating margins.

So although Ellison seems contradictory, his strategic vision is fairly straightforward. It makes sense for a large company facing a mature industry, and dismissing it as mere bluster is probably a small-f foolish move.

Further Foolishness:

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 537428, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 9:59:28 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/10/2009 9:43 AM
CRM $63.94 Up +0.45 +0.71%
salesforce.com, in… CAPS Rating: *
IBM $126.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ***
SAP $46.96 Down -0.22 -0.47%
SAP AG (ADR) CAPS Rating: ***
MSFT $29.04 Up +0.05 +0.18%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
ORCL $21.83 Up +0.41 +1.91%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Intellectual property: Intellectual property is the broadly defined category of assets that typically includes brand names, trademarks, copyrights, patents, knowhow, trade secrets, etc. They are barriers to entry for competitors.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!