L-3's Anti-Pyrrhic Loss
By
Rich Smith
December 7, 2007
|
Pyrrhic victory: n. A victory that is offset by staggering losses.
OK, we all know that. But what do you call a staggering loss that is offset by a pretty nice victory? I'm going with "anti-pyrrhic loss" for now, but I'm open to suggestions.
Whatever you call it, L-3 Communications (NYSE: LLL) won/lost big-time on Friday, when the $4.65 billion military translation contract it's been feuding over was finally, definitively, given to someone else (presumably, DynCorp (NYSE: DCP)). For readers just becoming aware of the story, let's bring you up to speed:
- This all began in June 2005, when L-3 bought Titan, a defense contractor providing translation and interpreting services to the U.S. military in Iraq. As Titan's new owner, L-3 was the presumed heir to Titan's ongoing contract, and the presumed favorite in any contract re-ups.
- One year ago, however, the military blew that presumption out of the water when it awarded the re-up to DynCorp in December 2006.
- L-3 promptly appealed the award to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). As I mentioned at the time, analysts did not expect L-3 to succeed with its appeal, but L-3 could "still manage to delay the handover of the contract to DynCorp by a month or three (it was due to expire in March 2007). Then L-3 could continue billing for as much as an entire quarter longer than it would have had it elected not to protest the decision."
- The Army then proceeded to prove this expectation correct (only in part, as we'll see) by extending L-3's contract into June while it considered the appeal.
- And then the GAO rejected L-3's appeal, but the Army allowed L-3 to continue working on the contract through at least Dec. 9 (at which point, presumably, the contract was to be re-awarded to L-3 or DynCorp).
Which brings us to this morning, when L-3 definitively announced that the Army "has not selected [L-3] to continue providing translators and linguists to support the U.S. military operations in Iraq." Full stop.
The good news is that L-3 was expecting this. The failure to win a re-up or a contract extension will not affect previous earnings guidance, which L-3 reaffirmed today: $13.7 billion in 2007 revenue, rising to between $14 billion and $14.2 billion next year; earnings of about $5.88 per share this year and $6.48 next year; and free cash flow of $1.1 billion or better in both years.
And the better news: A good chunk of this year's revenue and earnings shouldn't ever have been, given that when L-3 lost the translation contract 12 months ago, we were looking for only "as much as an entire quarter" of last-gasp business from the contract.
Foolish takeaway
L-3 may have lost its battle today, but it really won big-time.
“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.