Can Google Digg Harder Than Microsoft?

Recs

0

What has more Gs -- Digg's moniker or its asking price?

TechCrunch is reporting that a deal is apparently coming together for the social news website where users vote on which stories bubble up to the top. The tech blog's unnamed source claims that the two frontrunners are Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) and Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT).

Of course! Aren't those the two names at the top of every dot-com buyout rumor these days?

If the story is accurate, though, is there any doubt that Google will come out on top?

Let's go over Google's perfect timing if it really did want to snap up Digg.

  • Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) just launched Buzz, a Digg clone that may eat into the pioneer's traffic. The competitive threat may force Digg into selling at a low price.
  • Valuations in the dot-com space have fallen sharply recently. When names like Google, Bankrate (Nasdaq: RATE), and The Knot are fetching next-year income multiples in the teens, privately held darlings like Digg and Facebook aren't going to be able to go public at attractive price points.
  • As long as Microsoft believes that it has a chance to acquire Yahoo!, it will have to be thrifty with its depleting greenbacks.

The cherry on top is that Microsoft is the company currently serving ads on Digg. How perfect is that? Landing Digg would make Google even stronger at the expense of its ad-serving rival.

TechCrunch's source expects Google to bid in the $200 million to $225 million range, well below the $300 million that Digg was supposedly seeking originally. Google is obviously good for the money. As the world's leading online advertiser, it's also in the best position to milk the most out of monetizing Digg's pages.

With Web 2.0 social news sites popping up like gophers on a golf course -- and Google home to a popular news aggregator page -- one can argue that Google would be better off rolling out its own clone. I would disagree. Google's biggest purchase to date was its $1.65 billion purchase of YouTube, and it has paid off for the company even though it had a YouTube knockoff of its own.

Yahoo!'s buy of Flickr was a great deal, even as Yahoo! had an active photo-sharing site on its own (that it has since shuttered). Buying a niche leader provides credibility, one less rival to battle, and the sharp minds that made the upstart popular in the first place.

So I have no idea if Google is really digging Digg, but I dig it if it's so.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 594122, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 11:50:50 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
GOOG $569.96 Down -3.03 -0.53%
Google, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
MSFT $29.62 Down -0.16 -0.54%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
RATE $28.50 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Bankrate, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
YHOO $15.38 Down -0.23 -1.47%
Yahoo!, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Cost of goods sold: The cost of goods sold, or COGS, is the cost of the inventory or services that was sold.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!