5 Deathbed Stocks

Recs

2

We've all heard of the "death rattle," the last gasp from a lost soul's lungs. Sometimes, we seem to hear it from the companies in which we invest. Revenues dry up. Margins contract. Profits evaporate. All these signs suggest that their condition is worsening -- a financial death rattle, if you will.

Stocks in sick bay
Don't assume that all such companies are goners. While some will barely cling to life, others make a full recovery. Today, we're seeking companies that have all but given up the ghost.

For help, we'll turn to the clever coroners at our 105,000-strong Motley Fool CAPS community, where players give the thumbs-up or thumbs-down to more than 5,700 stocks. The first year of collecting data suggests that CAPS' highest-rated stocks performed best, while its lowest-rated companies fared worst. We've unearthed a handful of stocks that look like they might be headed 6 feet under, having recently dropped from two stars to the lowest one-star rating.

First, we'll check out some quick tests for liquidity -- the current ratio and quick ratio (also called the "acid-test" ratio) -- which gives us an idea of a company's ability to pay its bills. A current ratio above 1.5 and a quick ratio north of 1.0 means it's able to meet its short-term operating needs. But watch out! Too high a value might mean the company is hoarding assets that could be better used elsewhere.

We've also added the Altman Z-Score. In the 1960s, Edward Altman used statistical techniques on five financial ratios to predict the likelihood of bankruptcy, based on those ratios alone. The New York State Society of CPAs has said that the Z-Scores are the "tried-and-tested formula for bankruptcy prediction," but please note -- it's not designed to be used in every situation, and there are limitations to it.

A company scoring 3.00 and above is considered safe, scores between 2.70 and 2.99 are in the "yellow flag" zone, scores between 1.80 and 2.70 mean the chance of going bankrupt within two years is good, and scores below 1.80 mean "Watch out below!"

Here's today's list. The question is, are these companies only mostly dead, or have they already given up the ghost?

Stock

Current Ratio

Acid-Test Ratio

Altman  Z-Score

Eastman Kodak (NYSE: EK)

1.5

1.1

2.04

FiberTower (Nasdaq: FTWR)

8.2

6.9

(0.54)

Ford (NYSE: F)

1.9

1.7

0.99

NxStage Medical (Nasdaq: NXTM)

1.8

0.7

(0.31)

Semiconductor Manufacturing Int'l (NYSE: SMI)

1.2

0.9

0.59

Motley Fool CAPS; Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

You might be tempted to think that some of these need the ICU rather than a cemetery plot. Kodak, for example, seems to pass the short-term liquidity tests, although its Z-Score indicates careful consideration is due.

Moreover, not every type of company can be diagnosed by these quick tests: Financial institutions typically don't get measured by such ratios. Even so, stocks that CAPS investors have marked down to one star are possibly destined to seriously underperform the market in the future.

Dance or dirge?
Like its American rival General Motors (NYSE: GM), which appeared here last week, Ford is once again teetering on the edge of solvency as CEO Alan Mulally's effort to have the carmaker turn a profit got a flat tire recently. Investors didn't wait around to see what happened next, as they cashed in their shares in billionaire investor Kirk Kerkorian's tender offer bid of $8.50. It could be a long wait for the market to appreciate those shares that much.

Investors like CAPS player mbarno think that Ford remains out of touch with the car-buying public and that admitting you're a loser isn't exactly the way to gain adherents:

Ford is really reaching lately to find their niche with Microsoft technology but at the same time struggles to survive. With the economy on the rocks, the attempts of Ford should be to improve cost of production with translation to lower cost of products. They have cut costs of American jobs with lost faith in their largest market, but have not made the vehicles more affordable. Further, I can not recommend any company that admits recent defeat (i.e., advertisements that state their vehicle can now compare to Toyota). Did they really say that?

Rattling the cage
Are these companies doomed to drag their investors into an underworld of underperformance? Or will they recover to shine again? On Motley Fool CAPS, you have the power to tell your fellow investors just how you feel. Sign up today, absolutely free, and let us know whether you think the Grim Reaper's at the door.

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Fool contributor Rich Duprey owns shares of Ford, but does not have a financial interest in any of the other stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. Microsoft is an Inside Value selection. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 17, 2008, at 10:22 AM, DANSEATTLE54 wrote:

    Disclosure, I am an investor in NXTM.

    While mature, operating companies like EK and F may be analyzed this way, newer companies like NXTM need some deeper digging (I don't know anything about FTWR or SMI)

    NXTM is in a terrible cash and liquidity position. However, it is in the commercialization stages of a new Dialysis modality and is having strong market acceptance. They have proven time and again that they can raise cash based upon the market acceptance of their products. (Have you included the most recent stock deal and the ~$44mm of cash it brings?)

    This is not to say you are wrong, the risks are very high, but to lump NXTM and F in the same basket without comment is to paint with a very crude brush.

    PS. for a company dealing in ESRD products, "Deathbed" is a somewhat crude reference.

  • Report this Comment On November 15, 2009, at 4:28 PM, sskatt1and2 wrote:

    I am looking to invest in NXTM. I am a home dialysis user and this company looks to me like a major growth opportunity. The are about to launch the dialysis unit in the Asian and European markets. There have been patients cries from those areas for this modality. NXTM will not be able to get their product into those markets fast enough to satisfy the dialysis patients there. Seems to me that this kind of international growth is very promising.

    I think more recent stock evaluation is in order. This is more than 16 months old. Not what I would call up to date.

    sskatt

    =^.^=

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 662545, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 8:58:35 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 4:00 PM
FTWR $0.50 Down -0.03 -5.46%
FiberTower Corp. CAPS Rating: **
F $9.01 Up +0.13 +1.46%
Ford Motor Company CAPS Rating: **
GM $0.75 Down +0.00 +0.00%
General Motors Cor… CAPS Rating: *
EK $4.19 Up +0.04 +0.96%
Eastman Kodak Comp… CAPS Rating: **
SMI $3.17 Up +0.01 +0.32%
Semiconductor Manu… CAPS Rating: *
NXTM $7.34 Up +0.55 +8.10%
NxStage Medical, I… CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Nano cap: A nano cap is a company with relatively tiny market capitalization, generally below $50 million.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!